"Bob" wrote in message
...
Willlllburrrr !

And, you don't understand the absurdity of your methods? You don't see
how
what you do is a *******ization of cruising and voyaging? You need to
examine what your goals are and write them down in order of priorities.
If
your main goals involve 'keeping in touch' then you're in the wrong place
doing the wrong thing.

A hearty agreement !

Good man!



Weather the prime concern? lol Says, Skippy as he and his overloaded
boat
are cruising the Bahamas during hurricane season. Duh! If weather were
your
prime concern you'd be off cruising someplace and some time where there
were
no tropical cyclones in the offing.

Hummm I wonder what his insurance company says about that...........
oh, ya he aint got none cause even those blood suckers wont risk
betting on him.


Until he starts to get his priorities straight I wouldn't take the bet
either.



And, I am entirely correct to rant about 'certain' women voyaging under
sail. In the history of mankind there have been perhaps fewer than a 100
women who voyaged under sail and who were not a detriment to the
enterprise.


Be carful here Wilbur. Last week I was walking the commercial fish
docks and met a hot 28 yo.5'10 and built like a sleek well muscled
mongose. SHe owned a squared away 42' wood troller and was fishin
tuna. She had a crew of two other 20s women. She said she bought the
boat from her dad who fished it in alsaka and had been fisihg tuna/
salmon/crab for the last 8 years. I asked here where she fished. Her
reply: Alaska to northern cali and out to 150 miles.

She was one very cool skipper and rather pleasant conversationalist.

And, undoubtedly a lesbian. Face it, no real woman would do what she's
doing.


There are extreamly qualified and emotionally capable women....... its
just that most the marina dogs around here just cant hunt.


As a general rule, any woman who lives the sailing life, lives aboard her
own sailing vessel and sails the oceans of the world has something wrong
with her. Women simply aren't cut out for, nor are they capable of
establishing and maintaining a sea going life for extended periods of time.
They are genetically programmed to build a nice secure nest ashore where
they can bring forth children even if they have to be ******* children
because no man will commit to marriage with a woman who aspires to be a man.

To keep folks from calling me a mysoginist, let me say something similar
about a man. As a general rule, any man who lives the life of a nursemaid
has something wrong with him. Such a man would be genetically programmed to
be a woman - not a man.


Consider this, the only
reason I bother with you at all is I think you two are one of the few
couples these days who might actually enjoy cruising like it was meant to
be
if only you could honestly examine your priorities and commit to those
which
are really the most important in your lives.
Wilbur Hubbard

That will never happen WIlbur for neither are honest and both are
atempting to controll the other. As a result they compliment each
other's defeciencies in a mutualy dependent relationship with both
alternatly taking on the Parent/Child role (see 1970s Transactional
Analysis P-A-C)

Please remember that a truly capable woman wont chose a mate that is
anything less than a truly capable man.


You make an excellent point. A true woman mates with a man who maximizes her
chances of child-bearing and the successful nurturing of said progeny in
relative safety and security. But, this doesn't apply to Lydia and Skippy as
she's well beyond the reproductive age. I think she even has grown-up
grandchildren. But, even so, there is a defect in any woman who doesn't nest
up whether or not she can still lay eggs.



Wilbur Hubbard