On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 04:45:19 GMT, "Gordon Wedman"
wrote:

So, the point is, you can't reliably get the information
you need, to the required resolution, with an analog voltmeter.

Not quite there is such a thing as a vacuum tube volt meter, with at
least ten times the internal resistance, but still analog.

Richard Casady wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 04:45:19 GMT, "Gordon Wedman"
wrote:

So, the point is, you can't reliably get the information
you need, to the required resolution, with an analog voltmeter.

Not quite there is such a thing as a vacuum tube volt meter, with at
least ten times the internal resistance, but still analog.


Replying to a seven year old note?
Proposing a 40 year old technology?
I want some of that sauce too.
:-)
Brian W

"Brian Whatcott" wrote in message
...
Richard Casady wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 04:45:19 GMT, "Gordon Wedman"
wrote:

So, the point is, you can't reliably get the information
you need, to the required resolution, with an analog voltmeter.

Not quite there is such a thing as a vacuum tube volt meter, with at
least ten times the internal resistance, but still analog.


Replying to a seven year old note?
Proposing a 40 year old technology?
I want some of that sauce too.
:-)
Brian W

Oh, give him a break, Brian. Not everyone has broadband. :-D

--
KLC Lewis
www.cafepress.com/tmen
www.zazzle.com/klclewis
www.KLCLewisStudios.com