Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa,alt.free.newsservers
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 6, 3:43 pm, "Gregory Hall" wrote:
"marcia" wrote in message ... On Feb 6, 3:14 pm, "Gregory Hall" wrote: "marcia" wrote in message ... Or, people who don't rely on welfare or medicaid, but whom Jack doesn't approve of receiving SSDI because his crystal ball says they're too healthy to get it. Also in Jack's world: Once on disability, always on disability. Once on disability = always a leach. Even if you can't work because of a disability it's your family's responsibility or the responsibility of church and charities if you have no family members. Why has it become your RIGHT to force me as a taxpayer to take care of you because you are disabled, in many cases self-inflected either by stupidity or sloth. (I use 'you' figuratively speaking this isn't necessarily meant as a personal attack.) How about you liberals reach into your OWN pockets for money and take your filthy hands out of mine? -- Gregory Hall Why is it conservatives' arguments always seem to assume liberals don't practice what they preach? *Everyone* who works pays into Social Security, not just Republicans. I pay into it; disabled people (in most cases) paid into it before they became disabled. You don't like welfare and disability; I'm not particularly happy about how much money we spend on the military, particularly on the war in Iraq, where we never should have gone to begin with. I'm not happy about underwriting corporate welfare, or the fact that my tax dollars were partially used to subsidize year-end bonuses for the financial "geniuses" who were largely responsible for the current state of our economy. We individual taxpayers don't get to pick and choose how our dollars are spent. We're all stuck paying for some programs and policies we don't personally support. Why is that, Marcia? Well, the answer is simple. It is liberals and socialists who forced these welfare programs on everybody. Conservatives want nothing to do with them but are forced to contribute anyway. So when I say take your filthy hands out of my pocket and reach into your own instead you liberals say, "**** you - we're gonna make everybody pay whether they want to or not." In other words charity doesn't start at home for a liberal. Charity starts by reaching into somebody else's pocket. It's all too easy being generous with somebody else's money, isn't it. But when it comes to donating your own you liberals are such a stingy lot.http://digg.com/politics/Conservativ...e_30_more_than... That's the difference. -- Gregory Hall Okay, Greg. Take my money out of Iraq. Get it out of the pockets of the right-wing bankers who tanked the economy. Give me back my portion of the money that went to the oil companies who continue making record profits every quarter, without reinvesting in refineries, etc., and instead invest in green energy. See where I'm going with this? The Republicans initiated a few programs/policies/wars I don't approve of, but still have to finance. You are aware of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996 (PRWOR, aka "welfare reform") that took place under Clinton, limiting the amount of time an individual can be eligible for welfare, and enforcing work and/or education requirements on most recipients, right? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Praise for Australian PM | ASA | |||
In Praise of AIS | Cruising | |||
High praise indeed | General | |||
Suggestions On "Warmest" Type Of Socks To Buy For Person With Circ. Prob. ? | General |