Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike,
I have read their site, but went further and looked into the moisture absorption of Polyisocyanurate. I think they overstate the problem - probably to try and sell their vacuum panels. According to the manufacturers, it absorbs very little moisture (way less than the building codes require) but when it does, it reduces the R value to 80% of new and then stabilises . But, the R value quoted in the literature already takes this into account. The reduction takes place mainly around the edges if they are not sealed (often the case in house construction). The aluminum foil (both sides) minimises moisture entry through the surface and if the joints are well taped, this insulation should be fine. It does have a better R value that the Blueboard and the aluminum foil acts so as to reduce radiant heat transfer into the box. It is widely used to sheath houses under the siding and once installed is there for good - Just like our iceboxes! Besides, I am only adding to existing insulation and I already have the foam ![]() But, you are right - Styrofoam would be fine, but it needs greater thickness and I don't have much space. GM Rethink your foam choice. Glacier Bay has a cool site at: http://www.glacierbay.com/Instresult.asp Here you'll ultimately conclude that anything but Extruded Polystyrene (Dow "blue" Styrofoam Square Edge) is crap, because it falls apart or absorbs moisture. Mike Worrall Los Angeles |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
simple trick to make your icebox last longer | General |