Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My experience is with brushable clear enamel products rather than
arcylic automotive finishes. I was thinking of a wood surface also, which may tend to move enough to crack urethane coatings. Also some two part finishes are very hazardous to the health and require special equipment that might exclude a one off or amatuer project. No doubt there are super finishes out there, but I have to say that even clear automotive finishes tend to break down sooner than pigmented ones. Bray Haven wrote: Some unscupulous vendors would use the clear coat gimmick as a way to increase "protection" and charge more for a job. Hmm wonder why automotive finishes topped with clear coat last so long & look good doing it?? I've used 2 part auto CC (Nason) on varnish, outboards, painted wood etc with no ill effects whatever. Greg Sefton |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
(OT) Clear Channel SQUELCHES OPPOSITION TO BUSH/WAR | General | |||
Gel Coat , Clear Coat or 2 Part Epoxy??? | General | |||
HVLP gun to spray System Three LPU | Boat Building | |||
Anyone know anything about Armorpoxy one part epoxy paint? | General | |||
engine paint in fuel system | General |