Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My keel is an 8,750 pound bulb/fin. It is sort of a compromise. One of
my criteria was good up wind and light air performance. When John Fox started work on my design he had been building flat out racing boats so the first proposal had a 9' draft wing. We compromised with a 7' draft beavertail bulb. Beavertails count mightily against you in most handicapping systems but that was not a concern for me. As I said, the advantage of the bulb besides reducing draft for the same RM is the end plate effect and the beavertail is supposed to split up the remaining vortex. I talked to Mars about casting it for me but their price was a little over $1.40/pound plus some extra charges for waste disposal and transportation if I provided the plugs and bolt frame. That was 5 years ago. Being me, I set about collecting wheel weights and cast the bulb myself a couple of years ago. I have finally built up the nerve again and will be casting the fin just after Christmas. I figure to have about 40 cents/pound in the finished keel. OTOH, the backyard may end up with a Superfund designation some day. :-) Mars does sell a bolt on winglet set for shortening keels but it takes some design work to figure out the weight and location so that your RM does not change much. There has to be a careful balance of added weight and higher center of gravity. Also if the keel has a large dihedral shortening the keel will shift the lateral center of force forward which might make the boat a bit squirrley and hard to trim out. I would call Mars and see what they say. They have already done the engineering and have patterns for many different hulls. No matter what they say, ask for references for boats similar to the one you are contemplating modifying and check with the owner for actual results. Keel design is a balancing act between stability, performance and comfort. Production boat designers spend a lot of time and money trying to arrive at a happy compromise that is best for the market the boat is intended to compete in. Ssmall changes below the waterline can make big changes in the way the boat sails. Some can be good but more can be bad. Personally I would not consider a complete re-keeling of any boat. It would be outrageously expensive and you run the risk of changing the sailing characteristics of the boat in unpredictable ways. Skip Gundlach wrote: Hi, Glenn, and thanks for your input (crossposted to RBB). I've left the original thread attached to bring the RBBs up to speed. Since you're building one, and have done extensive research on all aspects of your boat, I'm interested to know what you'll do about a keel for RUTU (apologies if it's been covered already some time in the past - I don't get over to 'building' very often). I'm also interested in your opinion, if you have one, of Mars Metals' approaches to afterfits, and, if you've had any exposure to the modifications I'm speaking of. Anecdotal experience suggests that it's a neutral effect, or, worse, frequently, a negative effect. Of course, perhaps the add-ons already identified were homegrown, and Mars Metals' approach is engineered, which, of course, would make a tremendous difference. Thanks. L8R Skip -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |