Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
first comment: the angle of the sail to the apparent wind is naturally
assumed to be 22.5 deg (I think that's it) for max lift. the angle of the sail to the course of the planing boat is naturally assumed to be 90 deg on a beam reach for max power. the angle of heel when planing is naturally assumed to be zero as the boat will be planed flat. the sails are assumed to be new. that's how applied math works. the assumptions made are an idealized standard. they don't have to include variables for skill or equipment wear. all I'm looikng for is the power of the sail. the resistance of the boat is a separate calculation, or tank test. second comment: Oh yes, I've planed a dingy, in the middle of the night in a 24 hour race by observing the angle of some boats swinging free on their moorings in the moonlight and going wide on the downwind leg and screaming past the the gybe mark on a plane thereby gaining several boat lengths on the hot shots in the other boats. The sails were not new. Our pickup team did not come last against the hand picked hot shots. We came second last. I also recall observing the progress of a pleasure sailor and swinging accross the back of a fleet of racing dingys to overtake them from the rear and round the gybe mark on the inside screaming "ROOM, ROOM" with great gusto. What a mess. Sailing speed has more to do with reading winds and currents than boat speed. That why its so hard to beat the locals. However that should not prevent us while in the boat design stage from calculating the sail area needed for planing the boat when we do get 'round to reading the winds and currents. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ William R Watt National Capital FreeNet Ottawa's free community network homepage: www.ncf.ca/~ag384/top.htm warning: non-freenet email must have "notspam" in subject or it's returned |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rodney Myrvaagnes ) writes:
OK, that is enough that you should have observed that the delivered 'horsepower' fluctuated by at least an order of magnituded over a fairly short timespan. that's why I'm looking for a formula relating sail area and wind speed to sail horespower. its wind speed one uses to make any particular boat plane. Perhaps you would get closer to real questions if you started with loaded weights and sail areas of common planing boats. yes, that's the old way. but as you point out different boats have different resistance at different wind speeds. if I had a formula for sail horsepower at different wind speeds I woudl knwo what wind speed and sail area is needed to pane a hull with a known resistance (pounds) at a given wind speed. as we know from the lenght to speed formual resistance increases with boat speed. however TF Jones says it takes 1 hp for every 40-50 lns displacement to plan a "good" planing hull and I would use that instead of trying to determine the resistance of a particular hull under desing. I'll assume it is sufficietn for my purpose. its actually possible to predict if a boat will plane given sufficient sail power. my problem is finding the horsepower of the sail. that's what I'm lookign for. I have teh table GA notes is in Gerr's book. I forget where I saw it. I've taken notes from quite a few books. I do have the formula for pressure per square foot of sail at any wind speed (pressure = 0.004 times square of wind speed) over some reasonable range of wind speeds for sailing. I don't know how the 0.004 constant was derived. I think maybe I can work something out with that. For example, a Snipe, with very small sails and a quite heavy hull, can still plane under ideal conditions. So can a J 24. But neither does so often enough to be a common occurrence. 50-year old designs like 505 and FD can plane under ordinary conditions, and routinely do so. They are much lighter for their sail areas than the Snipe and J 24. More modern designs, like the Bethwaite 18-ft skiff and the 49er, plane almost all the time as far as I can tell watching them go. Unfortunately for your purpose, these make use of high-tech materials to make the dead weight small compared to the movable ballast (crew). They also carry sail area that could only be manageable with a very sophisticated rig. You could find out the relevant ratios (sail area/dsiplacement, displacement/area of planing surface, displacement/length) for all of these, and try to pack what you want into a weight that fits your desires. You will end up looking at carbon fiber composite and a very spartan interior. But at no time in this process will a horsepower formula help you. oh yes it will. wind power is what gets the boat to plane. ![]() -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ William R Watt National Capital FreeNet Ottawa's free community network homepage: www.ncf.ca/~ag384/top.htm warning: non-freenet email must have "notspam" in subject or it's returned |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sail THE TRANSAT from your computer | General | |||
Sail THE TRANSAT, the one of Chichester | General | |||
Horsepower Old vs New Outboards ? | General | |||
Exceeding rated horsepower? | General | |||
Weekender query | Boat Building |