Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oak don't like it to dry
am I reading the correct implication that oak will tend to split when dried out, but that softwood is likely to cope better and split less? Still why do you bother, partly because I want a challenge, partly because I want to work with high quality materials and avoid resins (my day job is making resins... I see enough of them and read enough MSDS' to put me off for life), but I think mostly because there is something about a "traditionally" constructed craft that gets me excited in a way that composite boats don't. S&G definitely has it's place, and epoxy/wood composite boats are excellent for light weight, ease of construction, ease of maintenance, but _for_me_ they are not as interesting or stimulating as clinker craft. And a very small perverted part of me wants to do it just because various authorities think it'll be far too hard for me ;-) Life is for living! Al |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
"Al" skrev i en meddelelse om... Oak don't like it to dry am I reading the correct implication that oak will tend to split when dried out, but that softwood is likely to cope better and split less? Still why do you bother, partly because I want a challenge, partly because I want to work with high quality materials and avoid resins (my day job is making resins... I see enough of them and read enough MSDS' to put me off for life), but I think mostly because there is something about a "traditionally" constructed craft that gets me excited in a way that composite boats don't. S&G definitely has it's place, and epoxy/wood composite boats are excellent for light weight, ease of construction, ease of maintenance, but _for_me_ they are not as interesting or stimulating as clinker craft. And a very small perverted part of me wants to do it just because various authorities think it'll be far too hard for me ;-) Life is for living! Al Sound you are not fanatic about it, and you shuldn't be. As with just a small quantity epoxies, you have the chance to make those small repairs, that the average person don't know is there. The Lapstrake method on the other hand, leave you the oppotunity to perform a structure that is much more advanced than most think, ------- but that the tailored planks will fit without thruout resistance is somthing important to remember, as sure you can force a plank edgevise , but you pay somhow if you are not keen about how things shuld be and could be. You are quite right about my warning about drying Oak, but as with all wood this also is about knowing the material and knowing the time needed to make sure the surface is not drying faster than the core, ----------- please let me give an example. Normaly wet wood just sawn, is still "secured" with a plank piece nailed to the end of the plank. When you ask why you get two ansvers ; first is that the nails will hold the plank from splitting , and that is silli , as when the plank dry it get more narrow while the plank piece with the nails keep the same length and by this fact, acturly help splitting the plank. Second ansver is that the plank nailed to the end of the wood, prevent the endwood piece to dry out to fast. But even this is true , then why not just do it as it shuld be done , replace the nails and plank piece with a layer of thick paint. Guess you have all chances to succes , if you find some realy old books about wooden boat building, but as you proberly know, it is better to trust your own judgement. A small quantity epoxy can save a perfect plank and I se nothing wrong, using a few grams epoxy to do so. -------- that's how I se Epoxy, not as somthing that is more than 50 pct. and where everything else shuld be depandant on that, but as a perfect glue. Not somthing to cover your missing skills but somthing that allow for perfect materials and skills. P.C. http://www.designcommunity.com/scrapbook/2806.html |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Go for it. I think one of the reasons that you see resins being glopped
around so much is because it is getting so darn hard, and expensive, to find good wood anymore. At least in any length ... Brian PS: I'm an epoxy glopper, but I will most definately go the traditional route at some point and take my time with a more artistic expression of boatology... which probably means clinker construction (MHO). -- My boat project: http://www.advantagecomposites.com/tongass "Al" wrote in message om... Oak don't like it to dry am I reading the correct implication that oak will tend to split when dried out, but that softwood is likely to cope better and split less? Still why do you bother, partly because I want a challenge, partly because I want to work with high quality materials and avoid resins (my day job is making resins... I see enough of them and read enough MSDS' to put me off for life), but I think mostly because there is something about a "traditionally" constructed craft that gets me excited in a way that composite boats don't. S&G definitely has it's place, and epoxy/wood composite boats are excellent for light weight, ease of construction, ease of maintenance, but _for_me_ they are not as interesting or stimulating as clinker craft. And a very small perverted part of me wants to do it just because various authorities think it'll be far too hard for me ;-) Life is for living! Al |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's like any hobby... if you look around, you can find boats cheap...
IMO, cheaper than you can build 'em, if you account for your time especially), and often cheaper than the materials. I'm building them for the experience, taxing my skills, the sense of accomplishment, etc. Ed Brian D wrote: Go for it. I think one of the reasons that you see resins being glopped around so much is because it is getting so darn hard, and expensive, to find good wood anymore. At least in any length ... Brian PS: I'm an epoxy glopper, but I will most definately go the traditional route at some point and take my time with a more artistic expression of boatology... which probably means clinker construction (MHO). |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Al) wrote in message I may
have to laminate knees however as I can't come up with any sources for grown crooks, and the stem will have to be, at least in part, a lamination. Al If you are looking for grown crooks, Try: http://www.newmansknees.com/ Disclamimer, they are a client. Scotty from SmallBoats.com |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sound you are not fanatic about it, and you shuldn't be.
Epoxy is a tool like any other in my book. If I hit a situation during the project in which epoxy is the sensible route to take (against my definition of sensible. Most people would say that building using the easiest, lightest weight method would be sensible... killjoys ;-p), I will make use of it. I may well use it at some point in the stem to avoid the hassles of stop waters. However, this is a boat that will shrink and swell, that will respond to the temperature, to it's environments. Copper has a little give in it whereas epoxy will tend to be pretty immobile, I suspect that there is potential over time for the epoxy to induce stress fractures in the timber. And at the end of the day, copper/timber is an old method that has stood up well to time. Epoxy hasn't had the same kind of long term (centuries) testing. Anyhow, plans are in the post. Thanks to Pat for pointing out crook supplier, I'll look into that when I've worked out my requirements. Thanks for all comments, right now I'm looking at western red cedar for planking, whatever I can get for knees etc. (probably oak from the literature). Centreline is still in question, although I'm tempted by Iroko or Utile as what I've read indicates good mechanical properties coupled with good looks. Ribs are hopefully suitable bending oak, failing that, probably ash. Foils are tricky, Leather suggesting "Mahogany" which leads me back in the Iroko/Utile direction. Any thoughts? Oars and spars are of course in Spruce. Thwarts are looking like Utile/Iroko, again for looks... I weigh a paltry 11stones so mechanical properties are not a big problem. Can anyone spot any major problems in the above list? Final question, I'm looking at getting hold of something like a 10 foot 3x6 as the backbone of my building jig. Presumably I can get away with Pine/Fir for this as long as I check it to avoid warp and plane it true? Thanks to everyone, there aren't many newsgroups I would consider as a source for valuable advice (used in conjunction with suitable literature), but I have learned over the past few years to have tremendous respect for more or less every poster here. Thanks. Al |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
( OT ) Bush's 9/11 coverup? | General | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General | |||
This war is On-Topic, really, Part One, very long | General |