Hi

I must agrea that I do not belive that glasfiber and resin is the only
solution.
I love to use Epoxies and know that a glasfiber boat offer the top of
what boatbuilding achived but I do belive more in other methods and I
think that sheet materials is a better alternative even as ready made
sheet materials cut after Digital projecting, --- . Still I do belive
that a combine of methods, like how you already se bigger glasfiber
paneled boats build with wooden frames , but why not take it a step
further so the boat only cost a third and is four times as strong, and
the builders start using actural digital tools not rewritten old
methods. Personaly I find epoxies and polyester to valuable a source
and the need for digital manufactoring more important , even in space
industrie the best would be metal not epoxy, but anyway if this is
about efficiency what\s wrong with pre hardened glasfiber sheets pre.
cut to form the framework assembly ready cut panels , and then build up
inside that, ---- premade glasfiber sheets already offer one smooth
side, why spend the time making an expensive plug to make a form if a
new technology offer a much more promising aproach. Why not focus on
sheet materials as that cover plastic aswell as metal and steel or
plywood.
Digital options as we se them today, is rather about making an
expensive plug with an expensive 3D router just to support a maby worn
out technike ,rather than using and expanding the real digital options.

With 3D-Honeycomb my attitude is, that now you have the full freedom
forming and a garentie for the strength , but it also is a compleat
other world, than just doing what else could be made by hand anyway,
realy you don\t use a 3D router for that and it seem that a simple 2D
N.C. cutter prove much more efficient forming the pieces for an
assembly.
Today\s design and architect programs are not about shaping the form
and generating the assembly but make a neat account, an account just as
70 years ago , now if we aks new solutions and new jobs it is my belive
that this ask a change in perception . We still translate the old
methods into computer code and ask a 3D router to router out the plug
to make the form so we stay with boatbuilding as how that is today,
maby a change in the way to build a boat or a house is what will bring
the jobs and the nice boats and houses at a third the cost four times
as strong as that ask digital tools.

P.C.

As I understood what you were saying is,

When the CNC machine cut templates by CAD drawings mesh together, a
rigid shape boat becomes available already!... and there is no need to
have a separate mould,much of drudgery is taken out of forming the hull
shape, both the inside and outside shapes are formed and are ready to
be filled in and spruced up. It is a logical but advanced continuation
of plywood laminating method. Right?

This 3D honeycomb technique appears highly productive and cost
effective, irrespective of how many boats have so far been made or not
made.

Regards

wrote:
Hi

I must agree that I do not believe that glasfiber and resin is the
only
solution.
I love to use Epoxies and know that a glasfiber boat offer the top of
what boatbuilding achived but I do belive more in other methods and I
think that sheet materials is a better alternative even as ready made
sheet materials cut after Digital projecting, --- . Still I do belive
that a combine of methods, like how you already se bigger glasfiber
paneled boats build with wooden frames , but why not take it a step
further so the boat only cost a third and is four times as strong,
and
the builders start using actural digital tools not rewritten old
methods. Personaly I find epoxies and polyester to valuable a source
and the need for digital manufactoring more important , even in space
industrie the best would be metal not epoxy, but anyway if this is
about efficiency what\s wrong with pre hardened glasfiber sheets pre.
cut to form the framework assembly ready cut panels , and then build
up
inside that, ---- premade glasfiber sheets already offer one smooth
side, why spend the time making an expensive plug to make a form if a
new technology offer a much more promising aproach. Why not focus on
sheet materials as that cover plastic aswell as metal and steel or
plywood.
Digital options as we se them today, is rather about making an
expensive plug with an expensive 3D router just to support a maby
worn
out technike ,rather than using and expanding the real digital
options.

With 3D-Honeycomb my attitude is, that now you have the full freedom
forming and a garentie for the strength , but it also is a compleat
other world, than just doing what else could be made by hand anyway,
realy you don\t use a 3D router for that and it seem that a simple 2D
N.C. cutter prove much more efficient forming the pieces for an
assembly.
Today\s design and architect programs are not about shaping the form
and generating the assembly but make a neat account, an account just
as
70 years ago , now if we aks new solutions and new jobs it is my
belive
that this ask a change in perception . We still translate the old
methods into computer code and ask a 3D router to router out the plug
to make the form so we stay with boatbuilding as how that is today,
maby a change in the way to build a boat or a house is what will
bring
the jobs and the nice boats and houses at a third the cost four times
as strong as that ask digital tools.

P.C.

Hi

The CNC is the sideeffect the gain but youdo not need a CNC mashin to
cut the framework , it can be cut with quite tradisional tools or
mashins.
The plans can be plottet on paper in full size and in the simplest way
to make the boat, you simply spray glue the full scale plans ontop the
sheet material and cut from the lines on the drawings, ---- the pieces
will fit together perfect.
But the technology I point to is the simplest and cheapest way to
establish a real digital production, the N.C. cutter is the cheapest
N.C. controlled equipment on the marked, but there are much more to it
--- the concept is a compleat change of aproach it make 4 boats at the
same time as 1 with the old methods.

Ontop there are the thing about materials this method ask only one type
of material sheet material. Where other methods ask 20 different
profiles knees , hangers, stringers nuts and bolts ----- again with the
3D-Honeycomb you do not bend any piece of the ribs or frames , when cut
flat they slide together to form a reliable and in terms of design and
projecting very rugid and simple structure ; again you do not bend one
single piece and pieces when cut fit perfect together, this is very
different from the time comsuming aproach you se in other methods where
fiddeling and bending acturly is a big and time comsuming part of it.
With this method you get the boat in the drawings. and pieces can be
made everywhere are easy to transport before assembling .

Now did I point to the fact that in easy terms and in a way everyone
can understand, computer design and cheap digital projecting make sense
and point to other progress such as how to build a house at a third the
cost so strong it will resist an earthquake , but if this issue
interest you please check the hundreds of structures to explain the
3D-Honeycomb concept, --- how also in architecture the 3D-H structure
offer a new aproach a new way to build and project a building by
offering the basic structure in a way that promise the new jobs and the
cheap strong new houses.

This concept do not deal with rebuilding with dirtbags, barbed wire and
mud --- it promise the new technology at a state everyone can
understand just by looking at it, it acturly make the computer work
where today's design and architect applications mainly is about making
a digital account , it is so different from the old methods and still
it only build ontop and offer just what you can emagine , but in a way
you can call digital.

P.C.