Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 12:26:05 +0000, Ian Malcolm wrote:
Morgan Ohlson wrote: On 24 Oct 2004 14:06:56 GMT, William R. Watt wrote: Stephen Baker ) writes: Morgan says: Center or transom sheeting is what I'm just conserning my brain with. If you have a loose-footed main, then I would seriously recommend end-boom (transom) sheeting, or the bending moments in the boom will be extremely high. you can run the sheet from the boom end to a block in the middle of the boom. that keeps it up out of the way and drops it pretty well into a block mounted, say, on the rear of the centreboard trunk. with a 70 sq ft main sail you'll need the leverage (mechanical advantage) of a multi part mainsheet fed through blocks. if you are going to be cruising small lakes and rivers with shifty winds you won't be able to cleat the mainsheet. you'll have to hold it in your hand all the time. you probably won't cleat the mainsheet on an 18 ft dingy anyway. too light and responsive. a rachet block is quite common and would take some strain off the arm holding the mainsheet. something to consider later if you find the strain on the arm too uncomfortable. the centreboard has to be top braced against lateral (sideway) stresses, sometimes done with a seat, sometimes with a simple thwart, on which a traveller and compass can be mounted. I seem to recall the back end of dingy centreboard trunks being braced by a metal mainsheet traveller alone. the traveller mostly just helps keep the sail flat when close hauled but also helps as a preventer. it's not essential for dingy cruising. you can see these things on photos and diagrams of sailing dingys like the Wayfarer. I don't know if there are any formulae covering these things, except of course for the mechanical advantage of the main sheet blocks. It's mostly trial and error and tales told by old dingy racers. It's quite common with slightly bent travelers (low at ends)... more seldom straight. (correct?). What is the main benefit? To get a transom sheeting an extended boom may be necessary. Does that have any complications in other ways? I have seen no end of trouble with boom end sheeting on dinghies. The usual problems include the common pin and swivelling strap boom end fitting failing in heavy weather, the multi part mainsheet wrapping round itself when gybing so you cant let the sail out without hauling it right in to clear the jam, and the mainsheet catching on the rudder stock or the corner of the transom when gybing causing all sorts of grief :-(. For a crusing dinghy, it will also make it unsafe to keep an outboard on the transom. I strongly reccomend reconsidering the boom end sheeting. If you go to centre sheeting, you will also need the foot of the sail attached to the boom which is no problem with a bolt rope on it. Have eyelets fitted in the foot of the sail just above the boom 2" aft of vertically in line with the reefing clew eyes on the leech so the sail doesnt get worn through by being trapped against the boom by the reefing lines. Each reefing line should be tied off using a bowline round the boom through the eyelet, leaving just enough slack to not affect the set of the sail when you arent reefed and led up through the appropriate reef eye in the leech and down to the end of the boom and then to whatever system you use for cleating the reefing lines. Although the eyelets just above the boom wouldnt be needed if your reefing lines were secured to the side or bottom of the boom like on a yacht, that would put a massive twisting load on the gooseneck, which dinghy goosenecks are NOT designed to withstand. Dont bother with single line reefing, a spring gate hook at the gooseneck on the same pin as is used for the Tack eye is much better than the extra friction and complexity of having shuttle blocks inside the boom. I have thin bungee threaded from the luff to the leech and back again through all the cringles for each reef with small plastic hooks on one side of the sail so I dont have to bother with tying reefing points, they just hook together under the boom round the hanging 'bag' of sail. The bungee should be just slack with the sail streched tight along that line of cringles before you hook it round the boom. Also if you forget one when shaking out a reef, there is enough stretch in the bungee to save the sail from being ripped. The only difficulty I have with the system is that the luff has a boltrope that slides into the mast groove so I have a lot of loose sail + the boom to control when lowering it. For a cruising dinghy 15' I'd strongly reccomend having slides up the luff retained by a pin or a gate at the bottom of the groove and a topping lift or better yet lazyjacks so the sail can be dropped quickly under full control without bashing the helm on the head with the boom or loosing the crew under the heap of sail. An unstayed rig with a jib is going to be a lot more trouble than having shrouds as the mast will need to be a heavier section and there will be a lot of stress on the partners and step. You will also have a LOT more trouble getting satisfactory jib luff tension. Avoid highfield levers for the jib halyard tensioner, IMHO they are the invention of the devil. I have a tensioner setup that uses a 2:1 tackle that sweats the halyard sideways before the cleat. Looking at the angles I reckon its worth a 4:1 or 5:1 advantage pulling on the halyard. You may not be able to use this setup, but if I had to use a different setup I'd rather have a muscle box that can be released in a controlled fashion (even though they are very inefficient) thatn a highfield lever which will do its bset to take your fingers off if you are tired or careless when you let it off. Figure on carrying a minimum of two jibs if you are not having roller reefing as you will want to keep the rig balanced with one reef in to avoid excessive weather helm. N.B. most small jib roller gears are only designed for furling ie. 100% out or 0% out and will break if used for reefing eg. 50% out in strong winds. The roller reefing gears are quite a bit more expensive, so I decided NOT to get one. On the subject of travellers and sheeting etc. The total sail area of my Albacore is ~125 sq feet (11.65 sq m) and she's 15' LOA and LWL which would be pretty close to the LWL of an 18 footer that doesn't have a vertical stem so the loads are closely comparable to your proposed design. The beam is 5'6" which would be less than you'd want for an 18' cruising dinghy and my traveller horse is unsupported 1.5" aluminium alloy tube running right across the full beam. Three parts of the four part center mainsheet lead to the traveller car, the fourth part runs to a swivel block with a cleat (which does get used quite a bit, mostly to rest my hand) on the back of the centerboard capping about 6" behind the traveller. The mainsheet leads through two single blocks on the boom, one over the traveller, the other over the swivel block. This spreads the load on the boom. When gybing I grab two parts of the mainsheet and control the boom as it comes over (keep your elbow bent :-) ). The traveller control line is a 3:1 continuous loop with turning blocks and cleats on the centreboard cap so I get a streight pull on it when I want to use it when sitting out. The original system was 2:1 cleating under the gunwales which was pretty useless in a blow. The traveler horse bends up about 3" in the middle if close hauled in a force 5 with two people hiking. Its been doing that for the past 40 years without any problems. I reckon you'd be fine with a modern X section track bolted to an alloy tube to stiffen it for a span of about 6 feet. No bulkhead required. Remember a 6' long track at mid boom is equivalent to one 12' long :-) at the transom. With centre boom sheeting and a traveller you dont need quite as powerfull a kicking strap (boom vang). If you stick to boom end sheeting you will need about 16:1 to get the leech flat enough off the wind in a blow. This will mean you will need either a massive boom section or to internally sleave it for the forward third of its length to stop it buckling. You will also have problems with the amount of mast bend it induces pulling all the shape out of the luff of the sail. I find 4:1 works well for me with centre sheeting and a full width traveller. Finally I hope you are fitting a pivoting centreboard not a daggerboard as the ability to fine tune the CLR to match the CE when reefed and reduce the weather helm if using main only is worth all the added complexity alone and if you touch bottom with it at speed you will be glad it can kick up rather than snapping off or ripping the trunk out of the hull with you miles from where you launched. Lot's of language trouble here. You say that the main sheeting get twisted around it self??? ...is rear sheeting different towards center sheeting in that aspect? Have eyelets fitted in the foot of the sail just above the boom 2" aft of vertically in line with the reefing clew eyes on the leech so the sail doesnt get worn through by being trapped against the boom by the reefing lines. Do you intend that the sail should be reefed towards itself instead of the boom? Towards a kind of ´support reef lineˇ ??? Does anyone have a link on this? So you would recommend stays (2 or 3?), perhaps with harken quick fasteners? Are there other good ones? How much lighter do you think a stayed mast will be? (for a 14m2 main+jib) You say bolt rope for the sail, but travelers up the mast (not bolt rope?)? There will be 2 thin pivoting lead ballasted steel centerboards in around 20deg angle from the lateral plane. (draft only ~0,8m for lakes). ...foil advice???? (and fat foil for rudder) Words Q Roller? spring gate hook? Cringles? partners and step? Great answers. Thank you for your advice. ...I will dwell on this a while. ![]() Thanks! Morgan O. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Perfect Dinghy wanted | Cruising | |||
Dinghy Thief Apprehended in Mazatlan (long) | ASA | |||
Skull Creek Marina complaint | Cruising | |||
What's the best dinghy for cruising and why? | Cruising |