BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   ASA (https://www.boatbanter.com/asa/)
-   -   In the Navy! (https://www.boatbanter.com/asa/99539-navy.html)

[email protected] October 30th 08 03:50 AM

In the Navy!
 
On Oct 29, 11:31*pm, "Charles Momsen" wrote:
The VDS was very effective. It could be dropped beneath the thermocline and
operated in a much quieter environment than any hull mounted unit.


Oh, I didn't say the VDS (which stands for Variable Depth Sonar, a big
fancy underwater microphone that could be lowered into the ocean on a
special cable) wasn't effective. I just don't think it's more than a
very tiny itsy-bitsy part of why the Soviet Union collapsed.


Great story though... still being talked about when I was in... thanks
for the link!


I left the ship 2 weeks before it happened. There was another incident about
a month before that involving 2 Osa missile boats but no one got hurt.



An incident on the ship I was on.... which was prbably not talked
about much outside that one ship.... the sonar gang had lowered the
Toad Array to about 600' while tracking a sub. Unbeknownst to the
conning officer, who drove the ship into water of about 450' depth...
and the taxpayers said "OUCH!"

DSK


Charles Momsen October 30th 08 03:58 AM

In the Navy!
 

wrote in message
...
On Oct 29, 11:31 pm, "Charles Momsen" wrote:
The VDS was very effective. It could be dropped beneath the thermocline
and
operated in a much quieter environment than any hull mounted unit.


Oh, I didn't say the VDS (which stands for Variable Depth Sonar, a big
fancy underwater microphone that could be lowered into the ocean on a
special cable) wasn't effective. I just don't think it's more than a
very tiny itsy-bitsy part of why the Soviet Union collapsed.


~~~~~I meant bringing commie submariners to their knees.


Great story though... still being talked about when I was in... thanks
for the link!


I left the ship 2 weeks before it happened. There was another incident
about
a month before that involving 2 Osa missile boats but no one got hurt.



An incident on the ship I was on.... which was prbably not talked
about much outside that one ship.... the sonar gang had lowered the
Toad Array to about 600' while tracking a sub. Unbeknownst to the
conning officer, who drove the ship into water of about 450' depth...
and the taxpayers said "OUCH!"

~~~~~~I hope the sonarman wasn't wearing headphones at the time.

DSK



Marty[_2_] October 30th 08 04:32 AM

In the Navy!
 
Charles Momsen wrote:
wrote in message
...
"Charles Momsen" wrote:
....... The Knox class was the first
class designed to withstand the blast of nuclear depth charges.

I dunno if I'd take that statement too seriously. As a strategic
countermeasure to the Soviet Navy's overwhelming number of subs at the
time, they were designed to deliver nuclear depth charges with a
possibility of surviving. The InSurv board had quite a lot to say on
the matter.


During sea trials they were shock tested with 4,000 lbs (4 kT) of explosive:

http://www.ussknox.org/knox_statistics.htm

The ASROC had a 10,000 lb (10 kT) yield:


'scuse me,,, 10,000 lb is 5 T, 10 kT is 20,000,000 lbs, small difference.


Cheers
Martin

Charles Momsen October 30th 08 03:00 PM

In the Navy!
 

"Marty" wrote in message
...
Charles Momsen wrote:
wrote in message
...
"Charles Momsen" wrote:
....... The Knox class was the first
class designed to withstand the blast of nuclear depth charges.
I dunno if I'd take that statement too seriously. As a strategic
countermeasure to the Soviet Navy's overwhelming number of subs at the
time, they were designed to deliver nuclear depth charges with a
possibility of surviving. The InSurv board had quite a lot to say on
the matter.


During sea trials they were shock tested with 4,000 lbs (4 kT) of
explosive:

http://www.ussknox.org/knox_statistics.htm

The ASROC had a 10,000 lb (10 kT) yield:


'scuse me,,, 10,000 lb is 5 T, 10 kT is 20,000,000 lbs, small difference.


That certainly was a good blunder, eh? Missed it by that much...



MMC October 30th 08 11:29 PM

In the Navy!
 

"Charles Momsen" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Oct 29, 11:31 pm, "Charles Momsen" wrote:
The VDS was very effective. It could be dropped beneath the thermocline
and
operated in a much quieter environment than any hull mounted unit.


Oh, I didn't say the VDS (which stands for Variable Depth Sonar, a big
fancy underwater microphone that could be lowered into the ocean on a
special cable) wasn't effective. I just don't think it's more than a
very tiny itsy-bitsy part of why the Soviet Union collapsed.


~~~~~I meant bringing commie submariners to their knees.


Great story though... still being talked about when I was in... thanks
for the link!


I left the ship 2 weeks before it happened. There was another incident
about
a month before that involving 2 Osa missile boats but no one got hurt.



An incident on the ship I was on.... which was prbably not talked
about much outside that one ship.... the sonar gang had lowered the
Toad Array to about 600' while tracking a sub. Unbeknownst to the
conning officer, who drove the ship into water of about 450' depth...
and the taxpayers said "OUCH!"

~~~~~~I hope the sonarman wasn't wearing headphones at the time.

That wouldn't have been much fun.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com