Palin is out of her league compared to Biden.

She will get crushed in the debate.

She should drop out now before futrther crippling McCain's bid for the
presidency.

Watch the debate and see.

"Charles Momsen" wrote in message
...
Palin is out of her league compared to Biden.

She will get crushed in the debate.

She should drop out now before futrther crippling McCain's bid for the
presidency.

Watch the debate and see.


All Gov. Sarah Palin has to do is wear a sexy little librarian costume that
shows some thigh and cleavage. She's a good friend of mine and she modeled
what she's planning to wear for the debate.

Here she is:
http://librarianavengers.org/wp-cont...libcostume.jpg

Nobody will even hear what she says if she should happen to make a big
mistake. She'll have every red-blooded man in America voting for her and
most of the women.

Wilbur Hubbard

Dave wrote:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:49:17 -0600, "Charles Momsen"
said:

Watch the debate and see.

Do you suppose they'll tell viewers that the moderator has a direct economic
interest in Obama's winning?


You been hangin' out with Larry Dave? Is the moderator a Freemason?

Actually I think we all have a direct economic interest in Obama winning.

Cheers
Marty

"Marty" wrote in message
...
Dave wrote:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:49:17 -0600, "Charles Momsen"

said:

Watch the debate and see.

Do you suppose they'll tell viewers that the moderator has a direct
economic
interest in Obama's winning?


You been hangin' out with Larry Dave? Is the moderator a Freemason?

Actually I think we all have a direct economic interest in Obama winning.

Cheers
Marty


Marty, you have to remember that Dave believes it's impossible to ask
intelligent questions if one has a financial stake in the game. He also
believes that it's much more important to attack the moderator before the
debate before actually hearing the questions and the answers than it is to
suspend judgement, skeptical though it may be. He forgets, apparently, that
both candidates agreed to the conditions of the debate. Of course, Palin can
always decline to attend. Or, perhaps McCain should suspend his campaign to
devote all his energy to fix the problem.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:09:24 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

Marty, you have to remember that Dave believes it's impossible to ask
intelligent questions if one has a financial stake in the game.

Nothing to do with "intelligent" questions. But of course the choice of
questions, the manner of posing them, the demeanor of the questioner, etc.
have no effect, right, Jon?

He also
believes that it's much more important to attack the moderator before the
debate before actually hearing the questions and the answers than it is to
suspend judgement, skeptical though it may be.

I believe it's helpful to be aware of the moderator's self-interested bias
in evaluating the process, and yes, that it's better to know of the bias
before, rather than after, the debate.

He forgets, apparently, that
both candidates agreed to the conditions of the debate.

Perhaps I missed it, but where was that condition about its being ok if
the
moderator stands to make a pile of money if one side wins, and not make
that
money if the other side wins? And about the moderator's taking that job
without telling anyone about her conflicting financial interest? If you're
betting on a horse race, would you like to know before placing your bet
that
the jockey riding the favorite has bet a bundle on the next ranked horse
to
win?

Dick Cheney was never biased toward Halliburton and never stood to profit at
the expense of America. Plus he was elected twice to the VP so there's no
conflict there either. Mr Cheney is a man of integrity.

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:26:40 -0600, "Charles Momsen"

said:

Dick Cheney was never biased toward Halliburton

You and Jon drinking from the same jug of kool-aid?


Dave and McCain think Palin is qualified to be President! Is there anyone
else?

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:26:40 -0600, "Charles Momsen"

said:

Dick Cheney was never biased toward Halliburton

You and Jon drinking from the same jug of kool-aid?

Kool aid jug? I thought it was a pee bottle. I hope Jon doesn't partake.

Dave, Cheney is as big a crook as the next politcian.

"I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more
efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote
welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to
repeal them. It is not to inaugurate new programs, but to cancel old ones
that do violence to the Constitution, or that have failed in their purpose,
or that impose on the people an unwarranted financial burden. I will not
attempt to discover whether legislation is 'needed' before I have first
determined whether it is constitutionally permissible. And if I should later
be attacked for neglecting my constituents' interests, I shall reply that I
was informed their main interest is liberty and that in that cause I am
doing the very best I can."

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:09:24 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

Marty, you have to remember that Dave believes it's impossible to ask
intelligent questions if one has a financial stake in the game.

Nothing to do with "intelligent" questions. But of course the choice of
questions, the manner of posing them, the demeanor of the questioner, etc.
have no effect, right, Jon?

He also
believes that it's much more important to attack the moderator before the
debate before actually hearing the questions and the answers than it is to
suspend judgement, skeptical though it may be.

I believe it's helpful to be aware of the moderator's self-interested bias
in evaluating the process, and yes, that it's better to know of the bias
before, rather than after, the debate.

He forgets, apparently, that
both candidates agreed to the conditions of the debate.

Perhaps I missed it, but where was that condition about its being ok if
the
moderator stands to make a pile of money if one side wins, and not make
that
money if the other side wins? And about the moderator's taking that job
without telling anyone about her conflicting financial interest? If you're
betting on a horse race, would you like to know before placing your bet
that
the jockey riding the favorite has bet a bundle on the next ranked horse
to
win?


So, what you're saying is that the McCain campaign doesn't approve of the
choice of moderator? News to them!

The book's been in the works in public for quite some time. The title was
known for quite some time. Ifill has a long history of integrity, which is
why she was chosen and why all approved her. Personally, I like the Swift
Boat timing of the attack. It speaks volumes about the right-wing.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:45:30 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

a long history of integrity

Brutus was an honorable man.

So are they all, all honorable men.

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:45:30 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

a long history of integrity

Brutus was an honorable man.


?? You're comparing Ifill to Brutus? Talk about a stretch!

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com