wrote in message
...


Encouraging concentration of the businesses,
banking or other, in fewer and fewer large firms is a recipe for further
problems. No business should be too big to fail.

I don't want to alarm you, Dave, but I agree with a lot of this.


Also a great tonic for political parties!

Encouraging the concentration of political power into one party is a recipe
for further problems.

Electing Obama would put government in the hands of one political party.

Voting for Obama is a recipe for disaster.

On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:39:10 -0600, "redbard"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .


Encouraging concentration of the businesses,
banking or other, in fewer and fewer large firms is a recipe for further
problems. No business should be too big to fail.

I don't want to alarm you, Dave, but I agree with a lot of this.


Also a great tonic for political parties!

Encouraging the concentration of political power into one party is a recipe
for further problems.

Electing Obama would put government in the hands of one political party.

Voting for Obama is a recipe for disaster.



You'd have to be pretty stupid to believe we have more than one
political party now as it is. Some people think we need a third party.
I'd be happy if we could at least manage two distinct ones.

wrote in message
...

troll sh*t removed


You'd have to be pretty stupid to believe we have more than one
political party now as it is. Some people think we need a third party.
I'd be happy if we could at least manage two distinct ones.

Perhaps instead of another party, we need them to get serious. You can put
lipstick on a pig... no, forget I said that.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

wrote in message
...


You'd have to be pretty stupid to believe we have more than one
political party now as it is. Some people think we need a third party.
I'd be happy if we could at least manage two distinct ones.


Or one could simply vote for someone who is different. Those type of people
do run, it's just that not enough people vote for them.