There seems to be an abundance of concern about the name in the From: line
in these groups.

There are too many anal retentive people whose main concern seems to be
trying to ascertain who is a sock puppet of whom and a consequent gnashing
of teeth as to why people just do not use their real identities like good
little mind controlled robots. Oh, the horrors of anonymity! Then follows
the holier than thou mud slinging as to the character or lack thereof of
subscribers who don't happen to fit the world model of the whiners and
complainers who would have everybody toe a line they have drawn in the sand
to define their little warped corner of reality.

It's not about the name! It's about the content of the post. Those of you
who are so overly concerned about real people using their real names are
living an unreal existence. Instead of examining the content of a post you
preoccupy yourselves with dwelling upon who, in real life, it could have
been writing the post as if that information has any bearing on the content
of the post, the message the posts wishes to convey, the lesson it attempts
to teach, the information it wishes to impart or the false information it
wishes to dispel. Your brain is dead. You are unable to accept an
intellectual challenge and respond in kind so you resort to attacking the
messenger.

Those of you who go around yelling "troll," "sockpuppet," "bully," etc. are
wasting everybody's time with your childish rants on discussion groups where
adults interact. Those who gloat over how many people they kill file are
simply demonstrating their anal retentive qualities and their refusal to
think. There is no wish to discuss. Nay, the only wish is to re-affirm a
closed mindedness by eliminating everything that doesn't happen to agree
with their beliefs.

So, I ask you a simple question, why bother with discussion groups when you
manipulate them to only consist of that which you agree wholeheartedly?
What's to discuss? Your mind is already made up. Why waste time reading
things that only affirm your thinking? Are you so very frightened of
diversity that your prime motive is to have everybody agree with you even if
it involves killing off everybody who does not?

The answer to that question lies in the word "insecurity." Closed minded
people are insecure. They have gained security at the expense of reality.
Reality frightens them. Creating their own reality comforts them. I ask you
another question, do you really think your refusing to consider differences
of opinions and continually bragging about your weakness and the fecundity
of your kill file is more constructive than the honest opinions of those you
decry - the sock puppets, the trolls, the bullies? You label according to
the depths of your own ignorance and then you attempt to foist those labels
off upon those whose minds are open? It you had half a brain you would
realize why you are viewed with pity and not respect.

Those of us who still value a mind that lives life fully loathe those of you
who deny and kill your mind. Without us you have nothing. You feed off our
minds because yours are dormant. You create an unreal world with your
filters and your closed windows and doors. Yet, there you are scratching at
the doors of thinking people seeking some sort of recognition. You aren't
even able to live by those principles your profess. Yet you claim some sort
of moral superiority. Hypocrites! Liars!


Wilbur Hubbard

On May 21, 10:58*am, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote:

Those of us who still value a mind that lives life fully loathe those of you
who deny and kill your mind.


For me I would simply say I do not respect them.


Without us you have nothing. ...Yet, there you are scratching at
the doors of thinking people seeking some sort of recognition. You aren't
even able to live by those principles your profess. Yet you claim some sort
of moral superiority. Hypocrites! Liars!
Wilbur Hubbard


Yes, Mr. Hubbard. They attempt to be a model of purity...they strive
to be the beacon of light on the hill for all to follow... Like the
early Puritans on the east coast they were more holly than tho and the
but in any purity culture the members eventually turn on themselves
persecuting the one of less purity. A purity culture will never be
able to survive because the very nature of their insecurity demands
they find a scap goat and then eventually turn inward with self
loathing.

Patience my friend rbc and asa nazi will soon be forced to eat their
young.
bob

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 May 2008 14:58:59 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote:
troll bs removed


That was ... beautiful, man.

Salty, It would be except for the source. Neal is a liar, a coward, a
racist, and a thief (and in a bunch of other equally odiferous categories)
by his own statements and actions. Anything he says is tainted by this. He's
not truly interested in a discussion involving differing opinions, as any
cursory review of his historical posts will reveal. He is, in a word,
pathetic and should have our sympathy but not our acknowledgement, since
that only fuels his psychosis.

Dollars to donuts my post will provoke him further, for which I apologize.
I've ****-canned him long ago and he can't stand being ignored.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
news:-pudnSOpgOlc5qnVnZ2dnUVZ_r6rnZ2d@bayareasolutions.. .
Salty, It would be except for the source. Neal is a liar, a coward, a
racist, and a thief (and in a bunch of other equally odiferous categories)
by his own statements and actions.

To wit . . .

"Then follows the holier than thou mud slinging as to the character or lack
thereof of subscribers who don't happen to fit the world model of the
whiners and complainers who would have everybody toe a line they have drawn
in the sand to define their little warped corner of reality."

Did I or did I not describe the exact method and actions of the whining and
complaining kill file users? Has not Jon Boy just validated the above
statement?


Anything he says is tainted by this. He's not truly interested in a
discussion involving differing opinions, as any cursory review of his
historical posts will reveal. He is, in a word, pathetic and should have
our sympathy but not our acknowledgement, since that only fuels his
psychosis.

More of what I described in the original post and above, is it not?

Dollars to donuts my post will provoke him further, for which I apologize.
I've ****-canned him long ago and he can't stand being ignored.

Wrong again! Why would I be provoked by somebody who posts confirming what
motivates such folks and how their actions are so predictable? On the
contrary, I am very happy you posted in such a timely manner and lent
credence to my summary of what motivates those who brag about their kill
files yet still come scratching at the doors of those of us who proudly
maintain an open mind and allow our ears to hear all and our eyes to see
all.

Thank you for buttressing my statements and providing such an excellent
example of how out of touch they are who filter their world and live in
their own little warped corner of reality. Of course, in your case, you
might have an excuse of sorts for your paranoia when it comes to dealing
with reality. I understand the burden you labor under. I have heard that
abusing illegal recreational drugs can and often does result in paranoia. I
sincerely hope your psychotherapy sessions yield fruit and that you are on
your way to a full recovery. A mind is such a terrible thing to waste.

Wilbur Hubbard

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 May 2008 12:45:09 -0700, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 21 May 2008 14:58:59 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote:
troll bs removed


That was ... beautiful, man.

Salty, It would be except for the source. Neal is a liar, a coward, a
racist, and a thief (and in a bunch of other equally odiferous categories)
by his own statements and actions. Anything he says is tainted by this.
He's
not truly interested in a discussion involving differing opinions, as any
cursory review of his historical posts will reveal. He is, in a word,
pathetic and should have our sympathy but not our acknowledgement, since
that only fuels his psychosis.

Dollars to donuts my post will provoke him further, for which I apologize.
I've ****-canned him long ago and he can't stand being ignored.

I was being facetious, Jon.




Sorry... I had a density attack due to a full day of air travel.


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 May 2008 14:58:59 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
snipped beauty

That was ... beautiful, man.



I know it. Thanks.

Wilbur Hubbard

No, actually that was plagiarism!!
Regards,
JR
wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 May 2008 14:58:59 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote:

There seems to be an abundance of concern about the name in the From: line
in these groups.

There are too many anal retentive people whose main concern seems to be
trying to ascertain who is a sock puppet of whom and a consequent gnashing
of teeth as to why people just do not use their real identities like good
little mind controlled robots. Oh, the horrors of anonymity! Then follows
the holier than thou mud slinging as to the character or lack thereof of
subscribers who don't happen to fit the world model of the whiners and
complainers who would have everybody toe a line they have drawn in the
sand
to define their little warped corner of reality.

It's not about the name! It's about the content of the post. Those of you
who are so overly concerned about real people using their real names are
living an unreal existence. Instead of examining the content of a post you
preoccupy yourselves with dwelling upon who, in real life, it could have
been writing the post as if that information has any bearing on the
content
of the post, the message the posts wishes to convey, the lesson it
attempts
to teach, the information it wishes to impart or the false information it
wishes to dispel. Your brain is dead. You are unable to accept an
intellectual challenge and respond in kind so you resort to attacking the
messenger.

Those of you who go around yelling "troll," "sockpuppet," "bully," etc.
are
wasting everybody's time with your childish rants on discussion groups
where
adults interact. Those who gloat over how many people they kill file are
simply demonstrating their anal retentive qualities and their refusal to
think. There is no wish to discuss. Nay, the only wish is to re-affirm a
closed mindedness by eliminating everything that doesn't happen to agree
with their beliefs.

So, I ask you a simple question, why bother with discussion groups when
you
manipulate them to only consist of that which you agree wholeheartedly?
What's to discuss? Your mind is already made up. Why waste time reading
things that only affirm your thinking? Are you so very frightened of
diversity that your prime motive is to have everybody agree with you even
if
it involves killing off everybody who does not?

The answer to that question lies in the word "insecurity." Closed minded
people are insecure. They have gained security at the expense of reality.
Reality frightens them. Creating their own reality comforts them. I ask
you
another question, do you really think your refusing to consider
differences
of opinions and continually bragging about your weakness and the fecundity
of your kill file is more constructive than the honest opinions of those
you
decry - the sock puppets, the trolls, the bullies? You label according to
the depths of your own ignorance and then you attempt to foist those
labels
off upon those whose minds are open? It you had half a brain you would
realize why you are viewed with pity and not respect.

Those of us who still value a mind that lives life fully loathe those of
you
who deny and kill your mind. Without us you have nothing. You feed off our
minds because yours are dormant. You create an unreal world with your
filters and your closed windows and doors. Yet, there you are scratching
at
the doors of thinking people seeking some sort of recognition. You aren't
even able to live by those principles your profess. Yet you claim some
sort
of moral superiority. Hypocrites! Liars!


Wilbur Hubbard


That was ... beautiful, man.

wrote in message
...
On 21 May 2008 15:44:02 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Wed, 21 May 2008 15:06:38 -0400, said:

That was ... beautiful, man.

On the contrary. It was utter horse ****. I should think that you at least
would recognize the difference between anonymity and sock puppetry.

If you had a working sense of humor, you would have realized I was being
facetious. Lighten up before you hurt yourself.


Don't ever accuse any liberal of having a sense of humor. They hate
themselves and they hate the world.

Wilbur Hubbard

wrote in message
...
On 22 May 2008 10:08:01 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Wed, 21 May 2008 19:41:11 -0400, said:

If you had a working sense of humor, you would have realized I was being
facetious.

That's a bit hard to credit in view of your history with various socks.

Bull****. I have been no more anonymous on usenet than you, Dave. You
have however, repeatedly fallen for posts by others using nyms sililar
to ones I haven;t used in a very long time. I occasionally change my
usenet name, but I don't post under multiple names at the same time.
When I change to a new name, I ditch the old one. So, I don't really
fit into the standard understanding of "sock puppet" which is what you
call someopne who posts under multiple names to try and give the
impression that they are several different people.

Maybe the next time I change it, I'll use the name of the founder of
some fast food joint.

Got it?



So......You're a "morpher" instead of a sock? You just hate it when
somebody (jon Blowy) killfiles you, so you morph out of his killfile? LOL
You change your name more often than Gaynze changes his sox. LOL

"David C. Thomas" wrote in message
...
[Default] On Thu, 22 May 2008 18:25:15 -0400, "Puff"
wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On 22 May 2008 10:08:01 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Wed, 21 May 2008 19:41:11 -0400, said:

If you had a working sense of humor, you would have realized I was
being
facetious.

That's a bit hard to credit in view of your history with various socks.

Bull****. I have been no more anonymous on usenet than you, Dave. You
have however, repeatedly fallen for posts by others using nyms sililar
to ones I haven;t used in a very long time. I occasionally change my
usenet name, but I don't post under multiple names at the same time.
When I change to a new name, I ditch the old one. So, I don't really
fit into the standard understanding of "sock puppet" which is what you
call someopne who posts under multiple names to try and give the
impression that they are several different people.

Maybe the next time I change it, I'll use the name of the founder of
some fast food joint.

Got it?



So......You're a "morpher" instead of a sock? You just hate it when
somebody (jon Blowy) killfiles you, so you morph out of his killfile?
LOL
You change your name more often than Gaynze changes his sox. LOL



Bite me!

No, but "Capt" JG might.