Sockpuppet Hell
 

http://www.informify.com/top-stories...-bullying-case

I wonder if this Wilbur sockpuppet who cyber bullied Jon with the Acid
trip BS and changing his web-site into a foul porn site will be
charged with cyber bullying?

Or will Jon have to kill himself first?

It's hard to squeeze water from a turnip, but Jon could sue and get
Wilburs 500 dollar crusty bottomed, bucket splashed, **** yellow
stained, broken boomed, derelict.

Fred

Sockpuppet Hell
 

wrote in message
...
http://www.informify.com/top-stories...-bullying-case

I wonder if this Wilbur sockpuppet who cyber bullied Jon with the Acid
trip BS and changing his web-site into a foul porn site will be
charged with cyber bullying?

Or will Jon have to kill himself first?


Are you suggesting that a drug sponge's impaired, marginal existence can be
called living?

--
Gregory Hall

Sockpuppet Hell
 

On May 19, 10:33*am, "Gregory Hall" wrote:
wrote in message

...

http://www.informify.com/top-stories...ogy/131-mother...

I wonder if this Wilbur sockpuppet who cyber bullied Jon with the Acid
trip BS and changing his web-site into a foul porn site will be
charged with cyber bullying?

Or will Jon have to kill himself first?

Are you suggesting that a drug sponge's impaired, marginal existence can be
called living?

--
Gregory Hall

That's hard to answer. Many definations of life may be possiable.

The question is, have you with your puppetry caused damage to Jon or
his company.
If I were on a jury I'd say yes. How many people googled up his
sailing info to find it mentioned by one of your foul puppets created
just to hassle and hide?

It will be nice to see the internet cleaned up of cowards like you.
Hopefully the woman who hassled the 13 YO into killing herself will do
20 years without internet access.

Fred

Sockpuppet Hell
 

wrote in message
...


That's hard to answer. Many definations of life may be possiable.

The question is, have you with your puppetry caused damage to Jon or
his company.
If I were on a jury I'd say yes. How many people googled up his
sailing info to find it mentioned by one of your foul puppets created
just to hassle and hide?

It will be nice to see the internet cleaned up of cowards like you.
Hopefully the woman who hassled the 13 YO into killing herself will do
20 years without internet access.



You are making a passel of assumptions. Are you able to prove any of them in
a court of law? More importantly do you even have standing to do so? If
you do then you are guilty of that which you accuse others - the heinous
crime of sock puppetry.

Does the bully legislation you refer to apply to other than minors?

Can an adult "bully" another adult by repeating or linking to that person's
public Usenet writings? Can a child bully an adult? Enquiring minds wish
to know.

--
Gregory Hall

Sockpuppet Hell
 

On May 19, 11:11*am, "Gregory Hall" wrote:
wrote in message

...

That's hard to answer. Many definations of life may be possiable.

The question is, have you with your puppetry caused damage to Jon or
his company.
If I were on a jury I'd say yes. How many people googled up his
sailing info to find it mentioned by one of your foul puppets created
just to hassle and hide?

It will be nice to see the internet cleaned up of cowards like you.
Hopefully the woman who hassled the 13 YO into killing herself will do
20 years without internet access.

You are making a passel of assumptions. Are you able to prove any of them in
a court of law? More importantly do you even have standing to do so? * If
you do then you are guilty of that which you accuse others - the heinous
crime of sock puppetry.

Does the bully legislation you refer to apply to other than minors?

Can an adult "bully" another adult by repeating or linking to that person's
public Usenet writings? * Can a child bully an adult? Enquiring minds wish
to know.

--
Gregory Hall

Sure anybody can bully anyone. It's about cause & damage.

It's good vs evil. Right VS Wrong.

If I become a sockpuppet to stop harassment there is no damage to
anyone except the person who is the cowardly harraser. My cause is
good, the damage is Neal.

You could be a man and stand by your given name as rightly preach the
evil of drug use. , but to try to cause harm to a persons income,
proffesion ect, even if using his own words for revenge of some cyber
snitching is a bit much. Then to carry on a vandeta for what seems
like decades is clear evidence of harrassment. You see if you were a
man and posted as yourself hassleing people then you break no laws,
besides slander if you commit it. The ruling by the feds was that the
woman created a sockpuppet for the sole purpose of harassing the 13
YO. In doing so she broke federal laws.

Let's pray that the woman who caused the 13 yo girl to kill herself
ends up in federal prison to set an example for people who go
overboard with sockpuppet hate and hasseling. People are sick of
cowards and cads who think just because they throw up momma skirt no
one will find them and give them what they deserve.

The good news is Jurys of peers will decide. And the peers will not be
fooled by the dancing smart mouth puppets.

Fred

Sockpuppet Hell
 

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.d...0?dmode=source

Sockpuppet Hell
 

"Richard" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 May 2008 07:14:44 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

http://www.informify.com/top-stories...-bullying-case

I wonder if this Wilbur sockpuppet who cyber bullied Jon with the Acid
trip BS and changing his web-site into a foul porn site will be
charged with cyber bullying?

Or will Jon have to kill himself first?

It's hard to squeeze water from a turnip, but Jon could sue and get
Wilburs 500 dollar crusty bottomed, bucket splashed, **** yellow
stained, broken boomed, derelict.

Fred

There are just a few problems:

1. For years Ganz has provoked a number of individuals with libel and
fighting words.

Not to mention numerous and continued bogus abuse complaints to NSPs and
ISPs. Not to mention conspiracy with at least one and possibly more people
to harass and spam with multiple abuse complaints and threaten with legal
action ISPs and NSPs.

2. At least one of Ganz's USP accounts was suspended because the
provider determined he was stalking.

Oh, could this be why he no longer uses Supernews and has recently gotten a
Giganews account?

3. Ganz has threatened to reveal personal information about others.

A case of 'do as I say, not as I do?'

4. The LSD postings were on Google Groups for over 16 years. Only the
original poster can have them removed. The postings are still
available from other archive services.

Very damning evidence and there's no way to deny he's the author. Even has
his former workplace name address and phone numbers on some of them.

5. Ganz has complained dozens and dozens of time to USP's focusing on
numerous individuals. Seems to be a chronic problem with only one
thing in common.

He's even a chronic complainer in the community where he lives. His latest
exploits include harassing a local electric provider about a substation he
doesn't like and griping in the newspaper about noisy airplanes flying low
in order to land at the airport. Duh!

6. I don't think he would do so well getting questioned by a sharp
attorney in front of a jury. He has a hard time sticking to facts and
always turns things into personal attacks.

Paranoid schizophrenic with a drug induced dementia???

7. With over 20,000 posts to Usenet there is a plethora of evidence
showing him provoking and attacking others for numerous and varied
reasons.

It's indesputable!

8. In the past Ganz has threatened several people with legal action
(his mother is a lawyer) that has resulted in some individuals
building a rather large collection of evidence not in favor of Ganz
should legal action ever result.

Archived safe, secured and redundant.

9. The claims against Wilbur pale in comparison to what others
(flonkers et al) have done. He would appear selective in his choice of
victim.

Wilbur is just a harmless, luvable, little fuzzball compared to some of the
enemies Jon Boy has made.

10. He has done more damage to himself by his behavior and posting his
identity than anyone else could do to him.

Without a doubt. Anybody who feels sorry for him also lives in La La land.

11. He can't shut up. It's an obsession. He has made little, if any,
effort to ignore the alledged perpetrator and he has never claimed
that he was not the author of said LSD posts, even when directly
asked.

How can he deny reality? As for shutting up that's laughable. He claims he's
got Wilbur killfiled yet he manages to continue to plonk him time after time
and Wilbur doesn't change his headers so Jon must have very ineffective kill
files. Or curiosity gets the better of him??

12. His use of smiley faces at the end of caustic posts would lead the
reader to believe his writings were never to be taken at face value
and that he enjoyed the "game" played at ASA for all those years.

He did until he got the tables turned on him and his methods . . .

13. He has maintained on a regular basis that "nothing on Usenet is
real" in reference to his posts and posts about him.

So is he trying to say those LSD posts of his aren't real either?

14. If he could take any legal action he would have by now many times
over. Would he swear on a Bible in a courtroom that he was not the
author of those LSD posts? Especially when the defence attorney has
Google's records? It may not go well.

And his former employer from whence the posts originated could surely verify
the source.

15. Wilbur has treated everyone equally. No one is singled out from
the truth.

Wilbur is definitely an equal opportunity truth-telling realist. He tells it
like he sees it. He's the anti-PC. He's no looter. He's a producer. He knows
who John Galt is. Wilbur is one of them "men of the mind." A credit to his
gender.

--
Gregory Hall

Sockpuppet Hell
 

wrote in message
...


Sure anybody can bully anyone. It's about cause & damage.

But is it illegal. Is it a crime. Is there a law on the books that can be
broken if children are not involved?
If so, please give a link to this imagined law of yours. If there were such
a law, Rush Limbaugh would be in jail. Don Imus, Randi Rhodes, The Rev.
Wright, Al Franken, Al Sharpton, Neil O'Reilly, and that Weiner moron would
all be in jail.

It's good vs evil. Right VS Wrong.

Oh, please!

If I become a sockpuppet to stop harassment there is no damage to
anyone except the person who is the cowardly harraser. My cause is
good, the damage is Neal.

Makes no sense. You're babbling . . .

You could be a man and stand by your given name as rightly preach the
evil of drug use. ,

And have my ISP and NSP continually harassed by multiple bogus abuse
complaints. No thank you, been there, done that. I chose to spare them the
trouble of dealing with anal retentive morons.

but to try to cause harm to a persons income,
proffesion ect, even if using his own words for revenge of some cyber
snitching is a bit much.

Some would say turnabout is fair play . . .


Then to carry on a vandeta for what seems
like decades is clear evidence of harrassment. You see if you were a
man and posted as yourself hassleing people then you break no laws,
besides slander if you commit it. The ruling by the feds was that the
woman created a sockpuppet for the sole purpose of harassing the 13
YO. In doing so she broke federal laws.

What is a sock puppet? What you call a sock puppet just might turn out to
be a legitimate user ID at a particular NSP. You need to examine your
definition. Show me the law that states an individual may only use one NSP
at a time, please.

Let's pray that the woman who caused the 13 yo girl to kill herself
ends up in federal prison to set an example for people who go
overboard with sockpuppet hate and hasseling. People are sick of
cowards and cads who think just because they throw up momma skirt no
one will find them and give them what they deserve.

Let's pray sanity reigns and the person held responsible for the suicide is
the girl who killed herself. It's about time little weenie jerks like
yourself started minding their own business and started taking
responsibility for themselves and quit pointing the finger of blame and
glorifying victimhood. It's about time parents stop raising children who are
so soft and weak - so self-centered. If any person, no matter their age, is
so weak and defective that they kill themselves because of what they read on
a computer screen then so be it. It's good that they can't pass along those
defective genes. The strong will survive and that's what counts.


--
Gregory Hall

Sockpuppet Hell
 

"Ray Burr" wrote in message ...



http://groups.google.com/group/alt.d...0?dmode=source



Ha ha. I guess that's one that didn't get removed because it's a reply and
Jon Boy didn't post it.
Very good! I see I'm not the only one to embrace reality and who doesn't
attempt to re-write history.
I will leave that to the liberals. They are very accomplished at re-writing
history or attempting to do so.

--
Gregory Hall

Sockpuppet Hell
 

On May 19, 12:45*pm, Dave wrote:

I sympathize with Jon, but we have far too many silly lawsuits today. Time
to get over the notion that every time your feelings are hurt you should run
to see a lawyer.

There is a big difference between feelings hurt, and trying to crush
one's source of income with an anonymous puppet.

That is why Mr Neal shifted to a puppet to torment poor Jon. He
created an on-line sockpuppet to do his dirty work, work he felt was
to risky to do as himself.

Fred

Sockpuppet Hell
 

wrote in message
...

There is a big difference between feelings hurt, and trying to crush
one's source of income with an anonymous puppet.

That is why Mr Neal shifted to a puppet to torment poor Jon. He
created an on-line sockpuppet to do his dirty work, work he felt was
to risky to do as himself.

Good theory, can you prove it? And you still didn't answer my question, "Do
you have standing?"

--
Gregory Hall

Fred

Sockpuppet Hell
 

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 May 2008 11:00:52 -0700 (PDT), said:

That is why Mr Neal shifted to a puppet to torment poor Jon. He
created an on-line sockpuppet to do his dirty work, work he felt was
to risky to do as himself.

Nah. As I've pointed out, there really are no such risks if he limits
himself to the truth. He's just a natural asshole, and he thinks socks get
him a larger audience for his nonsense. But they're really pretty easy to
spot and killfile.

Consider him the group's court fool.

No, consider him doing that which was forced upon him. Due to continued
harassment of various past NSPs and ISPs having to deal with continued and
numerous bogus abuse complaints from various netKKKops like Jon and his ilk
who take offense at just about every written word, there comes a time when
taking steps to nullify said harassment is called for. Among these might be
NSP's who don't show an IP address and who reply to and ****can all
complaints after the first proven bogus attempt from any individual. (One,
after ascertaining very first bogus complaint, will forward said complaint
to user.) The standard reply goes something like this. "We don't release
any personal information about our customers regardless of your threats. If
you're serious send us a subpoena." In other words, put up or shut up!

Another reason might be using two or three different NSPs in case one
provider decides they're sick and tired of dealing with multiple abuse
complaints whether valid or not and closes the account. (This abuse
complaint flooding is a trick employed in the past by Katysails and Jon Boy
and a couple others.)

Another might be to have several NSP accounts to enable one to exercise
one's brain debating subjects of all sorts in groups abuse complaint
stalkers such as Jon Boy have no way to learn the whereabouts of. One must
adapt to stay one step ahead of any and all petty minds who make censorship
their life's work.

As Wilbur would say, "I hope this helps."

--
Gregory Hall

Sockpuppet Hell
 

Bozo the Clown wrote in message
...
On 19 May 2008 12:45:07 -0500, Dave wrote:


1. "He did it first" is not a defense to libel.

2. Truth is a complete defense to libel or slander. So the principal
issue is whether Neal's claims are true.



" He did it first and continues to do it" certainly would throw cold
water upon any claims of bullying, victimhood or stalking.

Anyone can search the internet and find evidence of the drug posts.
Anyone can check the dates, names, phone numbers and employers. It
seems the evidence favors the accused.

I don't see many other business owners going on Usenet and repeatedly
making a spectacle of themselves. Maybe they have sense enough to know
it's bad for business. What kind of judgement was used to post to
alt.drugs from the workplace using the workplace signature lines and
headers about illegal and irresponsible behavior? The substance abuse
was one thing, but to boast about it 20 years later in a work setting
is not professional. Some may see a severe self destructive streak in
there.

Bozo


Oh, Bozo, you've got to understand these poor liberal *******s a little
better.

You've probably done gone and hurt their itty bitty feelings. After all, it
seems logical that those who so wholeheartedly support illegal drug use and
don't see any harm in somebody doing drugs and bragging about doing them on
Usenet and even encouraging and instructing others how to use them have
probably done and/or dealt illegal drugs themselves and are attempting to
justify their own illegal behavior by downplaying similar activities of
others. Failing to take a strong stand against all illegal drug use makes
these people part of the problem. I intend to be part of the solution. I
will never condone the use of illegal drugs. I will never support
lawbreakers who use or have used illegal drugs. I will never like those who
abide illegal drug use.

The sad thing is these giant liberal hypocrites who balk at speaking out
against illegal drugs will probably be among the first to cry foul when they
happen to stumble across their children using drugs. Oh, they will turn over
every stone trying to uncover the dastardly monster who sold their kids
drugs. And they will certainly be among the first to queue up to file suit
should some drug-impaired driver (or boat captain) cause to be injured or
killed one of their loved ones. They are colossal hypocrites. They
facilitate illegal drugs on the one hand by their not speaking out against
braggadocios drug users while on the other hand they moan and grown and cry
and whine should they or their loved ones become a victim of drug abuse.

But, that is today's liberal in action. Don't take any responsibility for
anything. Berate those who are taking responsibility and action. Yet blame
everybody but themselves when they are bitten in the ass by what they ignore
or even sanction.

I doubt this helps because you liberals will just deny the logic and reality
of what I've written. A good part of your liberal philosophy involves
denial.

Wilbur Hubbard
(just had to get in on THIS great discussion)

Sockpuppet Hell
 

On Mon, 19 May 2008 13:39:17 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
wrote:

What is a sock puppet? What you call a sock puppet just might turn out to
be a legitimate user ID at a particular NSP. You need to examine your
definition. Show me the law that states an individual may only use one NSP
at a time, please.

I am bemused. My tens of thousands USENET post have all been under my
own name, and if there is a downside, I haven't seen it.

Let's pray sanity reigns and the person held responsible for the suicide is
the girl who killed herself.

Well, yes.

Casady

Sockpuppet Hell
 

On Mon, 19 May 2008 13:17:51 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
wrote:

He claims he's
got Wilbur killfiled yet he manages to continue to plonk him time after time
and Wilbur doesn't change his headers so Jon must have very ineffective kill
files. Or curiosity gets the better of him??

It is true that some software has the option of the thirty day kill.
Wilburs stuff isn't always the gospel, but so what?

Casady

Sockpuppet Hell
 

"Gregory Hall" wrote:
.... It's about time parents stop raising children who are
so soft and weak - so self-centered.

So, you blame your parents for raising you to be a cowardly
sockpuppet?



.....The strong will survive and that's what counts.


It's surprising to me that anybody could define "strength" as using
multiple identities and forged cyber-ID (and usually poorly done, at
that) in order to say things they don't have the courage to say in
person.

DSK

Sockpuppet Hell
 

wrote in message
...
"Gregory Hall" wrote:
.... It's about time parents stop raising children who are
so soft and weak - so self-centered.

So, you blame your parents for raising you to be a cowardly
sockpuppet?



.....The strong will survive and that's what counts.


It's surprising to me that anybody could define "strength" as using
multiple identities and forged cyber-ID (and usually poorly done, at
that) in order to say things they don't have the courage to say in
person.

DSK


How can one claim the sockpuppet is a coward for hiding their identity, yet
claim that it is universally known who the sockpuppet is?

What is a forged cyber-id? If someone is forging they can get into a lot of
trouble and it is easy to report them.

A reasonable person would use a killfile and ignore any such nuisances. It
is only the unreasonable that find sockpuppets as attractive nuisances. So
the question is: what is the attraction?

Sockpuppet Hell
 

On May 20, 9:37*am, wrote:
*"Gregory Hall" wrote:

.... It's about time parents stop raising children who are
so soft and weak - so self-centered.

So, you blame your parents for raising you to be a cowardly
sockpuppet?

.....The strong will survive and that's what counts.

It's surprising to me that anybody could define "strength" as using
multiple identities and forged cyber-ID (and usually poorly done, at
that) in order to say things they don't have the courage to say in
person.

DSK

I do not think anyone defines the sockpuppet Wilbur, nor any of his
top right hand dresser drawer cast of baffoons as strong on anything.
Me thinks he's a barco lounger, page flipping, want-A-be at best. I
found this group because of a friends boat he was saying belonged to
him. Having crewed Chippawa I often google the name. I was astounded,
the owner would never let such an assole step aboard. The mans a waste
of space and would never be considered as crew. I bet he's a hermit.

Fred

Sockpuppet Hell
 

.. How many times have you crewed Chippewa? (note the spelling)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8Pk1UYkB3I

Fred

Sockpuppet Hell
 

wrote in message
...
I do not think anyone defines the sockpuppet Wilbur, nor any of his
top right hand dresser drawer cast of baffoons as strong on anything.
Me thinks he's a barco lounger, page flipping, want-A-be at best. I
found this group because of a friends boat he was saying belonged to
him. Having crewed Chippawa I often google the name. I was astounded,
the owner would never let such an assole step aboard. The mans a waste
of space and would never be considered as crew. I bet he's a hermit.


It is rather pathetic that you cannot even spell "Chippewa.". Sad that you
often Google a misspelled name and have not noticed your mistake? Sad that
you are an obvious fraud and a liar. Sad that you claim to know me when you
don't. Here's a photo that should prove you're a liar.

http://www.newportshipyard.com/image...rizegiving.jpg

You say you know me, Clayton, so you should recognize me in the photo. Tell
me which man is your friend, Clayton.


Wilbur "Clayton" Hubbard

Sockpuppet Hell
 

On May 20, 1:16*pm, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote:
wrote in message

...

*I do not think anyone defines the sockpuppet Wilbur, nor any of his
top right hand dresser drawer cast of baffoons as strong on anything.
Me thinks he's a barco lounger, page flipping, want-A-be at best. I
found this group because of a friends boat he was saying belonged to
him. Having crewed Chippawa I often google the name. I was astounded,
the owner would never let such an assole step aboard. The mans a waste
of space and would never be considered as crew. I bet he's a hermit.



*Here's a photo that should prove you're a liar.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxpNWr2B4sE

You say you know me, Clayton, so you should recognize me in the photo. Tell
me which man is your friend, Clayton.

Wilbur "Clayton" Hubbard

You are the one on the table.

Fred

Sockpuppet Hell
 

On May 19, 1:22*pm, Dave wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008 11:00:52 -0700 (PDT), said:

That is why Mr Neal shifted to a puppet to torment poor Jon. He
created an on-line sockpuppet to do his dirty work, work he felt was
to risky to do as himself.

Nah. As I've pointed out, there really are no such risks if he limits
himself to the truth. He's just a natural asshole, and he thinks socks get
him a larger audience for his nonsense. But they're really pretty easy to
spot and killfile.

Consider him the group's court fool.

Is it the truth when he convert Jon's sailing site into a porno site?
Looks, walks and sounds like constant harrasment to me.
Jon should sue Wilbur for lost wages.

Fred

Sockpuppet Hell
 

wrote in message
...


Is it the truth when he convert Jon's sailing site into a porno site?

Can you prove that statement? If you'd do a little Googling you might just
find that particular pornolizer spoof has been on the web for years.

Anybody's site can be spoofed with it. Example:
http://www.pornolize.com/pornolize4?lang=en&url=http%3A%2F%2Fanncoulter.com &submit=TranslateLooks, walks and sounds like constant harrasment to me.And your opinion actually matters? Bwaaaahahahahahhahahahhahaha.Jon should sue Wilbur for lost wages.What, that allowance his mommy gives him? Pocket change!--Gregory Hall

Sockpuppet Hell
 

"Richard" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 May 2008 07:14:44 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

http://www.informify.com/top-stories...-bullying-case

I wonder if this Wilbur sockpuppet who cyber bullied Jon with the Acid
trip BS and changing his web-site into a foul porn site will be
charged with cyber bullying?

Or will Jon have to kill himself first?

It's hard to squeeze water from a turnip, but Jon could sue and get
Wilburs 500 dollar crusty bottomed, bucket splashed, **** yellow
stained, broken boomed, derelict.

Fred

There are just a few problems:


bs deleted from another coward and liar

You are the problem.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Sockpuppet Hell
 

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 May 2008 15:20:51 -0100, Richard said:

There are just a few problems:

1. For years Ganz has provoked a number of individuals with libel and
fighting words.

Two problems with your post.

1. "He did it first" is not a defense to libel.

2. Truth is a complete defense to libel or slander. So the principal
issue is whether Neal's claims are true.

I sympathize with Jon, but we have far too many silly lawsuits today. Time
to get over the notion that every time your feelings are hurt you should
run
to see a lawyer.


Not sure what you're referring to with "but we have far too many silly
lawsuits...." He's not worth the trouble.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Sockpuppet Hell
 

wrote in message
...
On May 19, 12:45 pm, Dave wrote:

I sympathize with Jon, but we have far too many silly lawsuits today.
Time
to get over the notion that every time your feelings are hurt you should
run
to see a lawyer.

There is a big difference between feelings hurt, and trying to crush
one's source of income with an anonymous puppet.

That is why Mr Neal shifted to a puppet to torment poor Jon. He
created an on-line sockpuppet to do his dirty work, work he felt was
to risky to do as himself.

Fred


Really.. whatever, so my question is why do you care so much? You're the one
who started this thread... are you just another one of his many
"personalities?"

All you're doing is fueling his psychosis.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Sockpuppet Hell
 

On May 21, 1:03*am, "Capt. JG" wrote:


All you're doing is fueling his psychosis.



Yes, I'm hoping his head will pop like a big zit full of puss.

Fred
--
"j" ganz

Sockpuppet Hell
 

wrote in message
...
On May 21, 1:03 am, "Capt. JG" wrote:


All you're doing is fueling his psychosis.



Yes, I'm hoping his head will pop like a big zit full of puss.

Fred
--
"j" ganz


Thanks for nothing. Sounds like you have your own problems. It would be
nice, but unexpected if you would leave me out of it.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com