Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message anews.com... heavily snipped-Wilbur seems to think that older people are all decrepit and unfit On the subject of the Fortress aluminum anchor let me say this. Every real sailor knows that a light aluminum anchor is a joke in anything but ideal conditions. Wilbur got that right anyway. And Fortress anchors are not even solid. some parts are held on with little screws! |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Edgar" wrote in message
... "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message anews.com... heavily snipped-Wilbur seems to think that older people are all decrepit and unfit On the subject of the Fortress aluminum anchor let me say this. Every real sailor knows that a light aluminum anchor is a joke in anything but ideal conditions. Wilbur got that right anyway. And Fortress anchors are not even solid. some parts are held on with little screws! So what Neal is saying is... use an anchor appropriate to the bottom. Duhhh... not exactly rocket science to figure that out. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Edgar" wrote in message ... "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message anews.com... heavily snipped-Wilbur seems to think that older people are all decrepit and unfit Because they all ARE! It's a biological fact that the elderly are much diminished from their mental and physical capacites they embodied in their prime. It's nothing to be ashamed of but it IS something that should be taken into consideration. To deny aging equates to diminished capacity is to deny reality. On the subject of the Fortress aluminum anchor let me say this. Every real sailor knows that a light aluminum anchor is a joke in anything but ideal conditions. Wilbur got that right anyway. And Fortress anchors are not even solid. some parts are held on with little screws! At least there still remains to you some common sense. When I stated that Fortress anchors are a joke I meant every word of it. An aluminum anchor is tantamount to a lead balloon! There exists a market for such garbage only because of stupid, ignorant or crazy people. Wilbur Hubbard |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-04-14 13:27:55 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
said: Because they all ARE! It's a biological fact that the elderly are much diminished from their mental and physical capacites they embodied in their prime. It's nothing to be ashamed of but it IS something that should be taken into consideration. To deny aging equates to diminished capacity is to deny reality. But to assert that they are incapable is to deny reality as well. It's not an either-or, but a "both" solution. My wife can't manhandle systems on our boat the way I do. She needs winch handles, for instance, and couldn't easily haul our current anchor and chain by hand. She's a little girl and never had that sort of strength. But she can handle a properly set-up 46' cat as easily as our pocket cruiser once she learns the systems. All it takes is adapting your systems and techniques to the available skills. Sometimes the system needed *is* a smaller boat. We have a few people on our docks who aren't old or particularly incapable, but don't go out single-handed. They should have smaller boats. (Some got sailing dinks for knocking around.) -- Jere Lull Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:42:37 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote this crap: Therefore, though sail size is a limiting factor, it is not as big a limiting factor as anchor weight. And, I would suggest that more vessels get in trouble due to folks futzing around with anchors that are too heavy for them to handle than with sails that are on the largish end of the spectrum. A "lunch hook" is a trouble hook. Always use an anchor sized for the vessel Wilbur Hubbard I have a thirty-five foot yacht, and NO electric windlass. I have no problem pulling up the anchor. IMO you don't need one until you get 40 foot or larger. I'm Horvath and I approve of this post. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bloody Horvath" wrote in message ... On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:42:37 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote this crap: Therefore, though sail size is a limiting factor, it is not as big a limiting factor as anchor weight. And, I would suggest that more vessels get in trouble due to folks futzing around with anchors that are too heavy for them to handle than with sails that are on the largish end of the spectrum. A "lunch hook" is a trouble hook. Always use an anchor sized for the vessel Wilbur Hubbard I have a thirty-five foot yacht, and NO electric windlass. I have no problem pulling up the anchor. IMO you don't need one until you get 40 foot or larger. I'm Horvath and I approve of this post. For your perusal: Your thirty-five foot yacht, subject to where your are cruising, requires at least a primary anchor of about 35 pounds and a secondary one of about the same size. You may be able to get away with an aluminum anchor like the Fortress or equivalent of about 18 pounds. Not mention the weight of the chain you have a fair load to hoist. Compound this with a fresh wind when you lift your anchor and you will not have to go to Body Plus (Gym) that evening). The other way is to use an undersize anchor and lifting become much easier as well as dragging when the wind starts to freshen up. I never had a windlass for decades with my previous boat using a 13 pounds Danford. Now, with my new boat I carry three anchors, two of 35 pounds each and one of 18 pounds. Having pulled my old Danford for decades I appreciate the electric windlass. My windlass will not work unless the boat engine is on. Should the windlass becomes not operational I can always return to my basic training to pull the anchor or use one of the winches. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:51:23 -0300, wrote
this crap: I have a thirty-five foot yacht, and NO electric windlass. I have no problem pulling up the anchor. IMO you don't need one until you get 40 foot or larger. For your perusal: Your thirty-five foot yacht, subject to where your are cruising, requires at least a primary anchor of about 35 pounds and a secondary one of about the Yeah. So what? same size. You may be able to get away with an aluminum anchor like the Fortress or equivalent of about 18 pounds. Not mention the weight of the chain you have a fair load to hoist. Compound this with a fresh wind when you lift your anchor and you will not have to go to Body Plus (Gym) that evening). 35 lbs. is hardly more than a sixteen pound bowling ball in each hand. If you can't handle that... shape up or ship out. My sixteen year old nephew can pull up the anchor. I'm Horvath and I approve of this post. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:51:23 -0300, wrote:
"Bloody Horvath" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:42:37 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote this crap: Therefore, though sail size is a limiting factor, it is not as big a limiting factor as anchor weight. And, I would suggest that more vessels get in trouble due to folks futzing around with anchors that are too heavy for them to handle than with sails that are on the largish end of the spectrum. A "lunch hook" is a trouble hook. Always use an anchor sized for the vessel Wilbur Hubbard I have a thirty-five foot yacht, and NO electric windlass. I have no problem pulling up the anchor. IMO you don't need one until you get 40 foot or larger. I'm Horvath and I approve of this post. For your perusal: Your thirty-five foot yacht, subject to where your are cruising, requires at least a primary anchor of about 35 pounds and a secondary one of about the same size. You may be able to get away with an aluminum anchor like the Fortress or equivalent of about 18 pounds. Not mention the weight of the chain you have a fair load to hoist. Compound this with a fresh wind when you lift your anchor and you will not have to go to Body Plus (Gym) that evening). The other way is to use an undersize anchor and lifting become much easier as well as dragging when the wind starts to freshen up. I never had a windlass for decades with my previous boat using a 13 pounds Danford. Now, with my new boat I carry three anchors, two of 35 pounds each and one of 18 pounds. Having pulled my old Danford for decades I appreciate the electric windlass. My windlass will not work unless the boat engine is on. Should the windlass becomes not operational I can always return to my basic training to pull the anchor or use one of the winches. I'll add a bit to that. You have, say a 40 pound of anchor, anchored in say 30 feet of somewhat exposed water so you have a 5:1 scope out. The wind is blowing onshore at say 7 MPH. You are single handed. I guarantee that you will appreciate having a powered windlass! Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct email address for reply) |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wilbur Hubbard wrote:
Sail size is also important. But, it is often stated by competent sailors who write about such things that a man in good physical condition can hand and/or reef individual sails up to 500 square feet each even in strong winds. This size sail can be found on boats up to about forty feet LOA which vessels require anchors in the 50-60 pound range to be held securely in a storm. Therefore, though sail size is a limiting factor, it is not as big a limiting factor as anchor weight. My personal experience does not agree. My 42' boat has a displacement of roughly 33,000 lbs. It has a mainsail area of roughly 450 feet. I have no problems weighing anchor of 65 lbs with a reasonable lead of chain / rope rode, but I do have a serious issue handling the mainsail in heavy weather. Even with jiffy reefing, taking in a reef or furling the mainsail for running bare is a major issue while anchoring has always been rather simple. I have never tried anchoring in, say, 15 fathoms with an all chain rode, but then the mass of the anchor isn't really the issue as much as the rode. So a 10 lb anchor with that rode would be as difficult as the 65 (pretty much) meaning a Mac 26 would be as much a problem as my Tayana 42. Thus, as I said, the limiting factor isn't boat size or anchor weight but really, sail area. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:38:01 -0600, Paul Cassel
wrote: Thus, as I said, the limiting factor isn't boat size or anchor weight but really, sail area. You need a better sail handling system. Do you have lazy jacks, dutch men, and/or a stack pack system? I have seen one person easily handle the mainsail on a 70 footer using all the above (and an electric halyard winch). It is also important to have your halyard and jiffy reefing lines run back to the cockpit with stoppers and winches, halyard on one side, jiffy reefing on the other. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The answer ISN"T an electric or a bigger windlass | Cruising | |||
The bigger the boat, the bigger the mess | General | |||
Electric Windlass: How Important? | Cruising | |||
For Peggie: conversion of a Jabsco 37010 Series electric toilets to "Quiet - Flush" | Cruising |