Catamarans have something extra....
"Scotty" wrote in message . .. "KLC Lewis" wrote in How about passing international law that all shipping containers must be loaded, now *that's* the dumbest thing I've read all week. SBV I'm entirely capable of coming up with dumber stuff. Well, that would be hard to top, though I'm confident you'll try your hardest. Scotty Hey, if he wants dumber, he can always read and study the posts of some of the more......proficient? posters of this group. One who has more, is worth more, and is better at everything comes immediately to mind. Also, one from a bay-area in Kalifornicatia. |
Catamarans have something extra....
"Scotty" wrote in message . .. "KLC Lewis" wrote in How about passing international law that all shipping containers must be loaded, now *that's* the dumbest thing I've read all week. SBV I'm entirely capable of coming up with dumber stuff. Well, that would be hard to top, though I'm confident you'll try your hardest. Scotty Okay, so I take it you are going on record as being in favor of shipping containers floating free and sinking boats that cannot see them? It strikes me (no pun intended) that that's a pretty dumb position. But at least I'm not the one who came up with it. |
Catamarans have something extra....
"KLC Lewis" wrote in How about passing international law that all shipping containers must be loaded, now *that's* the dumbest thing I've read all week. SBV I'm entirely capable of coming up with dumber stuff. Well, that would be hard to top, though I'm confident you'll try your hardest. Scotty Okay, so I take it you are going on record as being in favor of shipping containers floating free and sinking boats that cannot see them? Well then, you take it wrong. I wrote no such thing! It strikes me (no pun intended) that that's a pretty dumb position. Well, *you* came up with it, so I'm not surprised. But at least I'm not the one who came up with it. really? show me the post where I wrote that first. SBV |
Catamarans have something extra....
"Scotty" wrote in message ... Well then, you take it wrong. I wrote no such thing! It strikes me (no pun intended) that that's a pretty dumb position. Well, *you* came up with it, so I'm not surprised. But at least I'm not the one who came up with it. really? show me the post where I wrote that first. SBV Look, bubbie, this isn't rocket science. I posted, somewhat tongue-in-cheek though not entirely so, a possible solution to containers floating around in a way that they could sink boats. You replied that it was "the dumbest thing (you) had ever read." It doesn't require a mighty leap of logic for one to then assume that you are opposed to the idea of requiring containers to sink. Ipso facto, you are in favor of them remaining afloat, where they can do harm. If you have a better solution to the problem, post it. |
Catamarans have something extra....
"Scotty" wrote in message . .. Last chance before you become Crap'n Kneel's kissing cousin: Post a better solution. |
Catamarans have something extra....
"KLC Lewis" wrote in message et... "Scotty" wrote in message ... Well then, you take it wrong. I wrote no such thing! It strikes me (no pun intended) that that's a pretty dumb position. Well, *you* came up with it, so I'm not surprised. But at least I'm not the one who came up with it. really? show me the post where I wrote that first. SBV Look, bubbie, this isn't rocket science. I posted, somewhat tongue-in-cheek though not entirely so, a possible solution to containers floating around in a way that they could sink boats. What you suggested was dumb...D U M B ! You replied that it was "the dumbest thing (you) had ever read." ''this week''. I haven't read your past posts. doesn't require a mighty leap of logic for one to then assume that you are opposed to the idea of requiring containers to sink. When you ASS U me stuff, you make an ASS out of U, not ME. Ipso facto, you are in favor of them remaining afloat, where they can do harm. You are WRONG again! Are you related to Boobspit? SBV |
Catamarans have something extra....
"KLC Lewis" wrote in message et... "Scotty" wrote in message . .. Last chance before you become Crap'n Kneel's kissing cousin: Post a better solution. I never said I had a better solution, although given 15 minutes I could come up with something better than your dumb idea. I merely pointed out that your dumb idea of always loaded containers was the dumbest thing I have read all week. It's not just dumb, it's unfeasible. SBV |
Catamarans have something extra....
"Scotty" wrote in message . .. "KLC Lewis" wrote in message et... "Scotty" wrote in message . .. Last chance before you become Crap'n Kneel's kissing cousin: Post a better solution. I never said I had a better solution, although given 15 minutes I could come up with something better than your dumb idea. I merely pointed out that your dumb idea of always loaded containers was the dumbest thing I have read all week. It's not just dumb, it's unfeasible. SBV Now that's the dumbest post I've read all year. My idea was not "always loaded containers." It was to always load or ballast them in a way that they would always sink if they went overboard. And since you have been thinking about this for a few days now without posting a better idea, capable only of casting derision upon those who actually HAVE ideas, I must now consider you to be incapable of having any ideas of your own. However, I accept the challenge you yourself proposed: You now have 15 minutes to come up with a better idea. |
Catamarans have something extra....
"Scotty" wrote in message ... "KLC Lewis" wrote in My idea was not "always loaded containers." It was to always load them Hooh Boy! Clock's ticking, bubbie. |
Catamarans have something extra....
"KLC Lewis" wrote in My idea was not "always loaded containers." It was to always load them Hooh Boy! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com