BoatBanter.com - Mac26X fit for all waters

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)

- ASA (https://www.boatbanter.com/asa/)

- - Mac26X fit for all waters (https://www.boatbanter.com/asa/81467-mac26x-fit-all-waters.html)

Mac26X fit for all waters

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:18:06 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

Though I won't go ocean sailing, I can't exclude the possibility of
getting caught in 6-8' waves in the Gulf. I'm not sure the Marshall
22 would be safer in that than the Mac 26.

A windy day sailing in the Gulf is comparable to being on the ocean.
The only real difference is that the swells are smaller but it is not
the swells that bother you.

There are *no* boats in the 20 ft range suitable for 6 to 8 ft wind
waves in my opinion. The boat will probably survive if it doesn't
capsize but the people will be in rough shape after a short time.
Even 40 footers get tiresome upwind in 6 to 8 ft waves unless they
are very heavily built.

Mac26X fit for all waters

* Vic Smith wrote, On 6/13/2007 9:18 AM:
Let's just say that if I had a quarter million boat budget a Mac 26
"would not be considered" - for any purpose.

When I was younger I used to think, "If I had the money, I'd do ..."
whatever seemed neat at the time. As the money became less of an
issue, I realized it was harder to know what I really wanted. As I've
said, the concept of driving around the country with a Mac doesn't
sound that bad. (But I'd probably do it with an RV and a kayak.)

I would simply buy one sailboat that sailed well for sailing and a
boat like the Parker for gunkholing, and have plenty of cash to spare.
Or maybe a low draft cat, which could actually suit both goals.
My impression is that a knee-deep (=24") draft cat with suitable 3
week livability for 2 either doesn't exist or cost too much for my
budget, but I may be wrong about that, as I haven't looked hard.

There are no cats that I would consider that can be had for under
$50K. Around $80K is entry level for a used Gemini or vintage Prout.
Of course, these are more than short vacation boats. The problem is
that the concept of cruising cats doesn't scale down very well, and
the 30 footers are the equivalent of a 40 foot monohull.

The one possibility might be a used Corsair F24 tri - rather spartan
on the accommodations, but shoal draft, wicked fast, and used they can
be under 30K.

I do think cats make the best cruisers and generally sail very well,
so I'm in no way a traditional sailing purist.
BTW, using that Mac which turtled as an argument against the Mac is
akin to claiming F/P Tobago 35 cruising cats flip easily because of
that recent Gulf incident. Apparently that cat also flipped in '01.
http://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/...rs-3534-3.html
These rare owner-induced incidents put me off a boat no more than
knowing that a 42' mast shouldn't be sailed under high voltage lines
hanging 40' above the water.

Owner-induced would is a good term for it. BTW, I'm not the one who
brought up the case of the Mac July 4 tragedy - I didn't even raise
safety as an issue until Ed tried to claim that the Mac was not to blame.

The difference is that everyone knows that a cat has the potential to
flip if the conditions get bad enough and you don't reduce sail.
Generally they are designed to handle 40 knots with full sail, but the
Tobago is aggressive with the sail area (about 30% more than mine with
less weight) so extra care would be needed. I don't know the full
story of this episode, but I gather they carried full sail in a squall
a ways offshore.

The Mac episode was rather different. Someone had borrowed the boat
on July 4th and took out some friends (with a few kids) to watch the
fireworks. Yes, there were a few people above the recommended limit,
and yes there was alcohol, but this was probably the case for half the
boats that left the dock that night across the country. The weather
was perfect: no wind, no waves. They pulled the anchor and apparently
the driver goosed the throttle by mistake. The boat tipped, someone
probably grabbed a stay, and it rolled over. I might expect this
behavior from a racing dinghy, or even a centerboard daysailer, but
not a 26 foot "cruising" boat. It is the totally unexpected nature of
this accident that sets it apart.

....
Is there some reason why you need a new boat?

No, but I don't buy fixer-uppers. I like turnkey shipshape.
I can handle buying old cars because I concentrate on certain models I
know well. I *never* encounter unanticipated expenses.

Don't fool yourself that new boats are "trouble free." I thought that
buying new from a quality builder would give me a "grace period" but
that was not the case. The engine gave me a lot of trouble for the
first year, including a 3 weeks unscheduled delay, fortunately in
Charleston SC, and paid for by Yanmar. The fuel lines almost had us
stranded 30 miles from shore on our first voyage. Much of the
plumbing was done by an apprentice and had to be gone over,inch by
inch. In fact, while most of the standard features worked fine, the
custom items, like the Lavac head and the big fridge were a mess and
have taken years to sort out. As a whole, the boat got "better" for a
few years, and then age started catching up. So my experience is that
"turnkey" is really achieved on a 2-3 year old boat, whereas a new
boat may have as many problems as a 5 year old. Of course, with a
trailer boat you have the possibility of sending it back to the dealer
for re-grooving.

(BTW, PDQ understands these new-boat issues. They have a couple of
crews that drive around to the new boat owners during the Spring
delivery season fixing as many of the new boat problems as possible.)

I know diddly about boat construction and hidden problems, except that
many owners find out about them too late. If I buy used, I'll go in
with my eyes open.

Survey! Don't buy without a survey! And never ever use a surveyor
recommended by the broker. (The best thing you can hear from your
broker when you're selling is "they're using a surveyor we recommended.")

Mac26X fit for all waters

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:32:55 -0400, Jeff wrote:

The one possibility might be a used Corsair F24 tri - rather spartan
on the accommodations, but shoal draft, wicked fast, and used they can
be under 30K.

Thanks. I had discounted tri's because of cabin size, but after
looking a little deeper now, the F24 is a possibility for the trips I
have in mind. This thing can sail as fast as a Mac can power, and
actually drafts less.

The Mac episode was rather different. Someone had borrowed the boat
on July 4th and took out some friends (with a few kids) to watch the
fireworks. Yes, there were a few people above the recommended limit,
and yes there was alcohol, but this was probably the case for half the
boats that left the dock that night across the country. The weather
was perfect: no wind, no waves. They pulled the anchor and apparently
the driver goosed the throttle by mistake. The boat tipped, someone
probably grabbed a stay, and it rolled over. I might expect this
behavior from a racing dinghy, or even a centerboard daysailer, but
not a 26 foot "cruising" boat. It is the totally unexpected nature of
this accident that sets it apart.

Well, my take is plain operator stupidity, and AFAIK it's a unique
incident. There were *11* people and a dog on the boat.
Three little girls, two of whom tragically drowned - that really
****es me off - and the dog were in the cabin.
The operator was in the cockpit. The other *7* adults, weighing who
knows how much, were on the bow. Duh.
*Nothing* is idiot-proof.
I was driving a big rented pontoon boat on a family fishing trip one
time and the damn thing almost tipped over when 4 heavyweights all
went to a forward corner. Totally unexpected.
The current was strong, and of course nobody was wearing a PFD.
It was scary, and if somebody drowned it would have been my fault for
not knowing the boat's limitations, and not instructing the passengers
on the rules.

--Vic

Mac26X fit for all waters

"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:32:55 -0400, Jeff wrote:

The one possibility might be a used Corsair F24 tri - rather spartan
on the accommodations, but shoal draft, wicked fast, and used they can
be under 30K.

Thanks. I had discounted tri's because of cabin size, but after
looking a little deeper now, the F24 is a possibility for the trips I
have in mind. This thing can sail as fast as a Mac can power, and
actually drafts less.

It can also turn turtle in a cat's meow. (pun intended). But, tris are a
little less likely to turn turtle than catamarans. Any sane person who
wants to sail a multi will go tri.

Wilbur Hubbard

Mac26X fit for all waters

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:03:24 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:18:06 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

Though I won't go ocean sailing, I can't exclude the possibility of
getting caught in 6-8' waves in the Gulf. I'm not sure the Marshall
22 would be safer in that than the Mac 26.

A windy day sailing in the Gulf is comparable to being on the ocean.
The only real difference is that the swells are smaller but it is not
the swells that bother you.

There are *no* boats in the 20 ft range suitable for 6 to 8 ft wind
waves in my opinion. The boat will probably survive if it doesn't
capsize but the people will be in rough shape after a short time.
Even 40 footers get tiresome upwind in 6 to 8 ft waves unless they
are very heavily built.

Good observations, and I'll keep them in mind. I said "caught"
because I want no part of seas that rough. But I don't count on
weather reports to be 100% accurate, so it could happen.

--Vic

Mac26X fit for all waters

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:59:57 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

the F24 is a possibility for the trips I
have in mind. This thing can sail as fast as a Mac can power, and
actually drafts less.

More correctly stated, it can sail circles around a Mac.

I had a ring side seat for the Corsair 28Rs at Key West Race Week this
year and they were extremely impressive. Here's a link to an
interesting GPS based video of the last race which does a good job of
illustrating their off wind speed:

http://tinyurl.com/34xanw

Mac26X fit for all waters

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:44:40 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:59:57 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

the F24 is a possibility for the trips I
have in mind. This thing can sail as fast as a Mac can power, and
actually drafts less.

More correctly stated, it can sail circles around a Mac.

I had a ring side seat for the Corsair 28Rs at Key West Race Week this
year and they were extremely impressive. Here's a link to an
interesting GPS based video of the last race which does a good job of
illustrating their off wind speed:

http://tinyurl.com/34xanw

Very nice. I can watch this one a few times at a time.
Do you what the x/y axes represent? Yards?
How about wind speeds?

--Vic

Mac26X fit for all waters

* Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 6/14/2007 3:09 PM:
Thanks. I had discounted tri's because of cabin size, but after
looking a little deeper now, the F24 is a possibility for the trips I
have in mind. This thing can sail as fast as a Mac can power, and
actually drafts less.

It can also turn turtle in a cat's meow. (pun intended). But, tris are a
little less likely to turn turtle than catamarans. Any sane person who
wants to sail a multi will go tri.

Wilbur Hubbard

You know even less about boats than Neal did.

Its pretty well known that tris are more prone to flipping than cats.
There are are number of reasons, but one major difference is that a
tri will fly a hull, which allows the wind to push up underneath. The
opposite hull (or ama) then is getting pushed under. Even though the
tri is wider than a cat, since only the center hull and one ama
actually provides buoyancy at one time, the the effective beam is
less. This situation can go critical when going over a wave, and the
windward ama lifts up, while the leeward one dips.

This is why the extreme racing tris sometimes have half the fleet
capsize in a race. The Corsairs have had their share of incidents,
but the vast majority have been during racing, there have been very
few incidents with boats setup for cruising.

Mac26X fit for all waters

Wilbur Hubbard wrote:

"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:32:55 -0400, Jeff wrote:

The one possibility might be a used Corsair F24 tri - rather spartan
on the accommodations, but shoal draft, wicked fast, and used they can
be under 30K.

Thanks. I had discounted tri's because of cabin size, but after
looking a little deeper now, the F24 is a possibility for the trips I
have in mind. This thing can sail as fast as a Mac can power, and
actually drafts less.

It can also turn turtle in a cat's meow. (pun intended). But, tris are a
little less likely to turn turtle than catamarans. Any sane person who
wants to sail a multi will go tri.

Wilbur Hubbard

Np, any sane person who wants to sail a multi will go with a Wharrum Cat.

Mac26X fit for all waters

"cavelamb himself" wrote in message
k.net...
Wilbur Hubbard wrote:

"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:32:55 -0400, Jeff wrote:

The one possibility might be a used Corsair F24 tri - rather
spartan
on the accommodations, but shoal draft, wicked fast, and used they
can
be under 30K.

Thanks. I had discounted tri's because of cabin size, but after
looking a little deeper now, the F24 is a possibility for the trips
I
have in mind. This thing can sail as fast as a Mac can power, and
actually drafts less.

It can also turn turtle in a cat's meow. (pun intended). But, tris
are a little less likely to turn turtle than catamarans. Any sane
person who wants to sail a multi will go tri.

Wilbur Hubbard

Np, any sane person who wants to sail a multi will go with a Wharrum
Cat.

Yah, right! Would that be James Wharrum? Bwahahahahahhahahahahahah!

I think a "Wharram" cat would be better. And there's some clowns here
who claim I don't know anything about boats?

Wilbur Hubbard

Mac26X fit for all waters

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:59:57 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

the F24 is a possibility for the trips I
have in mind. This thing can sail as fast as a Mac can power, and
actually drafts less.

More correctly stated, it can sail circles around a Mac.

I had a ring side seat for the Corsair 28Rs at Key West Race Week this
year and they were extremely impressive. Here's a link to an
interesting GPS based video of the last race which does a good job of
illustrating their off wind speed:

http://tinyurl.com/34xanw

Very informative. The crew of Dealer's choice is clearly superior with
their upwind work. Must be Capt. Neal at the helm. He lives in Key West,
doesn't he?

Wilbur Hubbard

Mac26X fit for all waters

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:50:36 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:59:57 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

the F24 is a possibility for the trips I
have in mind. This thing can sail as fast as a Mac can power, and
actually drafts less.

More correctly stated, it can sail circles around a Mac.

I had a ring side seat for the Corsair 28Rs at Key West Race Week
this
year and they were extremely impressive. Here's a link to an
interesting GPS based video of the last race which does a good job
of
illustrating their off wind speed:

http://tinyurl.com/34xanw

Very informative. The crew of Dealer's choice is clearly superior with
their upwind work. Must be Capt. Neal at the helm. He lives in Key
West,
doesn't he?

Wilbur Hubbard

Neal... If you are living in Key West, you must be sleeping with the
chickens.

CWM

Didn't you hear? Key West hired a Mexican chicken catcher. No lie! Hey,
do you know why Negroes rarely marry Mexicans? They're afraid their
kids would be too lazy to steal.

Wilbur Hubbard

Mac26X fit for all waters

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:33:30 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

Good observations, and I'll keep them in mind. I said "caught"
because I want no part of seas that rough. But I don't count on
weather reports to be 100% accurate, so it could happen.

6 to 8 ft waves are routine conditions offshore on open water.

Mac26X fit for all waters

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:07:57 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

Very nice. I can watch this one a few times at a time.
Do you what the x/y axes represent? Yards?
How about wind speeds?

The course was Windward/Leeward with legs of about 2 miles, so the
scale could be either yards or meters. Wind was about 10 kts out of
the north east. Dealers Choice was consistently the number one boat
all week long and it's easy to see why when you watch their tactics.

Mac26X fit for all waters

On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:53:42 +0200, Ed Gordon wrote:

Jeff wrote in
:
So please explain to us which boats it sails faster than. You've said
many times that its a "fast sailer" but when I look at the ratings, I
have trouble finding a boat remotely comparable to a Mac that isn't
10% faster, or more. In fact, its real hard to find a boat that's
slower than a Mac. So please, give us an example of a boat that sails
slower than a Mac.

Any boat that has less length waterline will be slower than a Mac under
sail.

Yeah... I'm sure the Martin 242 (or Hotfoot 20) sailors are shaking in
their boots when they see a Mac26 next to them...

But since the Mac is a plaining hull it can go faster than heavy
ballast keel boats in winds strong enough to plain it off. You want an
example, just look up boats that have less than a 23 feet. Here's one
much slower Alerion Express 20.

I watched a Mac26 and a Catalina 27 sail upwind in about 10-15knots (from
ahead of course, I was in my Catalina 36...). They looked about equal,
although the Mac was heeling unbeleivably at times. Then they tacked...
and it turned out the Mac had so much leeway it was 1/2 mile behind!

Thanks, but I think even a trailerable Cat 22 would beat a Mac26 (and
doesn't capsize for no reason, and will take more than 5 passengers...)

druid - has had 12 on his Cal 25 without it capsizing
http://www.bcboatnet.org

Mac26X fit for all waters

On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:05:31 -0500, KLC Lewis wrote:

SPECIAL SAFETY INFORMATION 26M
SPECIAL SAFETY WARNINGS:
Boats, like any other form of transportation, have inherent risks.
Attentions to these warnings and instructions should help keep these risks
to a minimum.

THE WATER BALLAST TANK SHOULD BE FULL WHEN EITHER POWERING OR SAILING.

IF THE BALLAST TANK IS NOT COMPLETELY FULL, THE BOAT IS NOT SELF
RIGHTING. (IF YOU CHOOSE TO OPERATE THE BOAT WITH AN EMPTY TANK, SEE THE
SECTION ON OPERATING THE BOAT WITHOUT WATER BALLAST.)

WHEN THE BALLAST TANK IS FULL:
- NO MORE THAN 6 PERSONS, 960 POUNDS.

WHEN THE BALLAST TANK IS EMPTY:
- NO MORE THAN 4 PERSON, OR 640 POUNDS.
- CREW WEIGHT CENTERED FROM SIDE TO SIDE.
- ALL SAILS REMOVED, ENGINE POWER ONLY.
- NO ONE ON THE CABIN TOP OR FORDECK.
- WAVES LESS THAN 1 FOOT.
-OPERATE WHERE WATER IS WARM AND
RESCUE IS LIKELY.
- NEVER OPERATE THE BOAT WITH A PARTIALLY
FILLED TANK.

WHEN POWERING OVER 6 MILES PER HOUR:
- RUDDERS AND DAGGERBOARD FULL UP.
- SAILS REMOVED.
- NO ONE ON THE CABIN TOP OR FOREDECK.

OK, so the Mac is supposed to also be a (planing, presumably) powerboat.
But I have yet to see ANY trailerable powerboat over 20 ft with these kind
of safety restrictions. Hell, even a BAYLINER you can ride on the
foredeck, have more than 6 people on board, or operate in waves greater
than 1 foot...

druid
http://www.bcboatnet.org

Mac26X fit for all waters

On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:58:58 +0200, Ed Gordon wrote:

"KLC Lewis" wrote in
et:

So when the wind pipes up to force 6 or 7 and the mast starts pumping
and flexing that cabintop and you're 2000 miles from anywhere... "Oh
God, thy sea is so big and my boat is so small, and why didn't you
bless me with two broken legs on the day before I was to set off on
this voyage?"

On a Mac you can take the mast down for less windage. It makes the
stability better, too. You can motor along and keep up with the waves so
they don't break over you.

You've never been IN force 6 or 7, have you?

In conditions like that, you're gonna go forward and TAKE THE MAST DOWN?
'Course, you could just put up the main and wait for the wind to do the
job for you...

druid
http://www.bcboatnet.org

last week while sailing in 10-15kt on a beam reach, doing
5-6.5 kts, I see a sail boat with no sails , motoring
through the waves. ''it'' passed me, a Mac26x. God what an
UGLY boat!

Scotty

"Scotty" wrote in message
. ..
last week while sailing in 10-15kt on a beam reach, doing
5-6.5 kts, I see a sail boat with no sails , motoring
through the waves. ''it'' passed me, a Mac26x. God what an
UGLY boat!

Scotty

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Greg

"Gregory Hall" wrote in message
...

"Scotty" wrote in message
. ..
last week while sailing in 10-15kt on a beam reach, doing
5-6.5 kts, I see a sail boat with no sails , motoring
through the waves. ''it'' passed me, a Mac26x. God what an
UGLY boat!

Scotty

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Greg

Beauty is skin deep. Ugly goes all the way to the bone.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Mac26X fit for all waters

"Duncan McC (NZ)" wrote in message
. nz...

IIRC, it was the container shippping cost only - San Fran
to
Christchurch, NZ I think.

ie a pack the boat in yourself job, and unpack - and hope
you don't get
customs requesting a fumigation etc etc. Actually, they
probably would
want the container fumigated.

Oz and NZ are real fussy about the wood that comes onto
their island. It must be heat treated, and stamped so, or
they will insist on fumigation. Even stamped wood still gets
bored for testing frequently.

Of course, there is no wood on a Mac, just one big Clorox
bottle .

SBV

On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:58:01 -0700, "Capt. JG"
wrote this crap:

"Gregory Hall" wrote in message
...

"Scotty" wrote in message
. ..
last week while sailing in 10-15kt on a beam reach, doing
5-6.5 kts, I see a sail boat with no sails , motoring
through the waves. ''it'' passed me, a Mac26x. God what an
UGLY boat!

Scotty

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Greg

Beauty is skin deep. Ugly goes all the way to the boner.

You have to gay-up everything, don't you?

This post is 100% free of steroids