"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
...

OzOne wrote in message
...
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 19:30:12 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
scribbled thusly:


OzOne wrote in message
...
Your memory is obviously faulty.

Read up you asshole anti-American terrorists facilitators, Bobsprit
and
Ozone...

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0021007-8.html

My memory is very sound it would appear.

Here is just a small part of the speech.

"Some citizens wonder, after 11 years of living with this problem,
why
do we need to confront it now? And there's a reason. We've
experienced
the horror of September the 11th. We have seen that those who hate
America are willing to crash airplanes into buildings full of
innocent
people. Our enemies would be no less willing, in fact, they would be
eager, to use biological or chemical, or a nuclear weapon.
"Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat
gathering
against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the
final
proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom
cloud. As President Kennedy said in October of 1962, "Neither the
United
States of America, nor the world community of nations can tolerate
deliberate deception and offensive threats on the part of any nation,
large or small. We no longer live in a world," he said, "where only
the
actual firing of weapons represents a sufficient challenge to a
nations
security to constitute maximum peril."

"Understanding the threats of our time, knowing the designs and
deceptions of the Iraqi regime, we have every reason to assume the
worst, and we have an urgent duty to prevent the worst from
occurring."

I rest my case.

Wilbur Hubbard

You destroy your case.
Significant mention of the threat of biological and nuclear weapons
and their threat to the US.....
There were none...It was a vendetta agains Saddam...

You've again proven that you cannot actually comprehend what you
read.


On the contrary, it is not I but you liberals who ignore the parts you
read that don't support your idiotic conclusions. What matters is
AFTER THE FACT FINDINGS that there were none. What matters is
everybody agreed PRIOR TO THE FACT that there was a significant threat
FROM THEM. You can't stick your head in the sand and ignore a
significant threat. (Unless you're a liberal and a terrorist
facilitator like you and that scum Robert Brody.)

Wilbur Hubbard.

Revised: I inadvertently left out an important 'not'

On the contrary, it is not I but you liberals who ignore the parts you
read that don't support your idiotic conclusions. What matters is NOT
AFTER THE FACT FINDINGS that there were none. What matters is
everybody agreed PRIOR TO THE FACT that there was a significant threat
FROM THEM. You can't stick your head in the sand and ignore a
significant threat. (Unless you're a liberal and a terrorist
facilitator like you and that scum Robert Brody.)