"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
...

"Maxprop" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Scout" wrote in message
. ..
"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
...

OzOne wrote in message
...
On Mon, 28 May 2007 13:26:05 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
scribbled thusly:

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...ow_article= 1

Happy holidays, Oz! Have a gay old time. Bwahahahhahahahahahahahahah!

Wilbur Hubbard

Shame is that I won't be able to sit and have a beer with some of my
gay friends in that pub.

I'm sure the pub will allow gays to invite their guests for a brewski.
And, if your physical appearance is anything like your whining,
leftwing, immature-world-view, effeminate Usenet persona, everybody
will be sure you're gay and belong there... But, unless you swing both
ways, you might have to come up with some original rejoinders for those
men who hit on you such as, "Some other time, Dearie, my herpes is
acting up right now," or "Not a good idea, Honey, I got my HIV test
back and it's positive, or "See that big handsome stud in the leather
chaps over there, that's my boyfriend and he's very possessive." You
get the idea....

Cheerio,
Wilbur Hubbard

My wife and I accompanied a gay friend to two gay bars in New Hope about
10 years ago. One crowd was older men and they were decent enough
fellows. The other was a young man's bar and it was clearly the most
angry group I've ever encountered in a club. Very hostile group.
Scout

You'd be angry, too, if your love life centered solely around other men.

So, let me see if I understand this correctly, gay = angry? Sort of a
misnomer, isn't it?

I recently read a novel penned in the 50s. The author periodically referred
to people as "gay," meaning, of course, happy and ebullient. It was a good
word. Too bad it got adopted to mean something darker and more ominous. I
wonder what those authors of yore would say about 'the angry gays.'

Max