Great idea! And while he's there he can point out the servicemen to
young
Thomas and say, "You don't want to grow up to be like them, they're
uneducated losers!".


Are they lowers? Nope.
Are they poor and uneducated? Generally yes. Sorry, but it's a fact.


RB
35s5
NY

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
ups.com...


Are they poor and uneducated? Generally yes. Sorry, but it's a fact.


But they are the ones we can trust with guns, bombs, tanks and nuclear
weapons.

What does that say about the wealthy and educated?

"Bob Crantz" wrote in message
...

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
ups.com...


Are they poor and uneducated? Generally yes. Sorry, but it's a fact.


But they are the ones we can trust with guns, bombs, tanks and nuclear
weapons.

What does that say about the wealthy and educated?

There should be a draft, as proposed by Congressman Rangle. No exemptions
(18-50). Everyone should serve in some capacity for at least 1 year.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
ups.com...

Are they lowers? Nope.
Are they poor and uneducated? Generally yes. Sorry, but it's a fact.


Oh no Mr Bill!

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Nat...y/cda06-09.cfm


Mr Hands delivers another Smackdown!

ooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhh!!!!!!

On May 24, 10:46 am, "Bob Crantz" wrote:
"Capt. Rob" wrote in message

ups.com...



Are they lowers? Nope.
Are they poor and uneducated? Generally yes. Sorry, but it's a fact.

Oh no Mr Bill!

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Nat...y/cda06-09.cfm

Mr Hands delivers another Smackdown!

ooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhh!!!!!!

You will just confuse the idiot with the facts Bob.

He'd rather quote M. Moore and think less of the people who serve and
protect this country. It's the only excuse he has to explain to his
boy why he failed to serve his country. He likes to think of himself
as superior to the poor under educated unlucky sad sacks that have to
join, to keep from starving or going to jail.

Joe

On May 24, 1:00 pm, Dave wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 12:37:43 -0400, Charlie Morgan said:

As opposed to "The Heritage Foundation"?

Ah, the old "if you can't deal with the argument attack the source"
technique.

Yeah, I guess BB the dunce missed this part:

[7] U.S. Department of Defense, Population Representation in the
Military Services, Fiscal Year 2004,p. 3-11.

[8] Ibid., p. 2-22.

[9] For example, see Bowman, "Lowered Standards Help Army Meet Recruit
Goals."

[10] Ibid., p. 1-3, and U.S. Department of Defense, Population
Representation in the Military Services, Fiscal Year 2005, Table B-8.

[11] Race cannot be examined on an individual five-digit ZCTA level
because the Census Bureau supplies data only for com*bined regions
with the same first three ZCTA digits.

[12] "Population" refers to U.S. Census population estimates for each
year for the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. It excludes
Puerto Rico. U.S. Census Bureau, Population Change: July 1, 2002, to
July 1, 2003, at http://www.census.gov/popest/states/...POPCHG2004.csv
(October 13, 2006).

[13] Kane, "Who Bears the Burden?"

[14] For more information on ZCTAs, see U.S. Census Bureau, "Zip Code
Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs)," April 16, 2001, at www.census.gov/geo/ZCTA/zcta.html
(July 6, 2006).

[15] U.S. Census Bureau, United States Census 2000, Summary File 1, at
http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/.../sumfile1.html (July 6, 2006),
and Summary File 3, at http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/.../sumfile3.html
(July 6, 2006).


[16] U.S. Census Bureau, 2004 American Community Survey, Table S1501,
at http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/.../sumfile1.html (July 6, 2006);
Table B02001, at http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet...o_id=01000US&-
ds_name=ACS_2004_EST_G00_&-mt_name=ACS_2004_EST_G2000_B02001 (July 6,
2006); and Table B03001, at http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet...le?_bm=y&-geo_
id=01000US&-ds_name=ACS_2004_EST_G00_&-_lang=en&-redoLog=false&
-mt_name=ACS_2004_EST_G2000_B03001&-currentselections=ACS_2004_
EST_G2000_B03001&-CONTEXT=dt (August 9, 2006).

[17] U.S. Census Bureau, 2005 Population Estimates, Table GCT-T1-R, at
http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet..._id=01000US&-_
box_head_nbr=GCT-T1-R&-ds_name=PEP_2005_EST&-format=US-9S(July 6,
2006).

Joe

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...

You goonybirds are smacking yourselves down.

CWM

And you just got smacked from the left:

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1103-21.htm


Moo-hoo-hoo-haa-haaa!!!!!!

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On 24 May 2007 14:29:04 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Thu, 24 May 2007 15:14:34 -0400, Charlie Morgan said:

Now, now Joe. I'm sure Charlie has facts readily at hand to dispute the
conclusions reached by the HF. I eagerly await his presentation of those
facts.


Well, Dave, I tried to look at it from Joe's point of view, and also
from yours. I was physically unable to get my head that far up my ass.

So I take it you don't have those facts?

So, I take you have absolutely no idea whether I have the facts or
not? You also have not confirmed from reliable independent sources
that Joe or the Heritage Foundation have presented any facts.

Joe has certainly provided more source info than you have, reliable or
otherwise.

Max

"Bob Crantz" wrote in message
...

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...

You goonybirds are smacking yourselves down.

CWM

And you just got smacked from the left:

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1103-21.htm


Moo-hoo-hoo-haa-haaa!!!!!!


Getting smacked from the left must be the ultimate put-down for a liberal.

Max

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 24 May 2007 13:34:05 -0600, "Bob Crantz"
said:

And you just got smacked from the left:

Interesting. The Marine reservist just down the hall from me, who recently
came back from a tour in Iraq, has an Ivy degree.

As we've witnessed from BB, that doesn't seem to hold much credence any
longer.

Max