Fun for Thomas
 

Great idea! And while he's there he can point out the servicemen to
young
Thomas and say, "You don't want to grow up to be like them, they're
uneducated losers!".


Are they lowers? Nope.
Are they poor and uneducated? Generally yes. Sorry, but it's a fact.


RB
35s5
NY

Fun for Thomas
 

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
ups.com...


Are they poor and uneducated? Generally yes. Sorry, but it's a fact.


But they are the ones we can trust with guns, bombs, tanks and nuclear
weapons.

What does that say about the wealthy and educated?

Fun for Thomas
 

"Bob Crantz" wrote in message
...

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
ups.com...


Are they poor and uneducated? Generally yes. Sorry, but it's a fact.


But they are the ones we can trust with guns, bombs, tanks and nuclear
weapons.

What does that say about the wealthy and educated?

There should be a draft, as proposed by Congressman Rangle. No exemptions
(18-50). Everyone should serve in some capacity for at least 1 year.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Fun for Thomas
 

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
ups.com...

Are they lowers? Nope.
Are they poor and uneducated? Generally yes. Sorry, but it's a fact.


Oh no Mr Bill!

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Nat...y/cda06-09.cfm


Mr Hands delivers another Smackdown!

ooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhh!!!!!!

Fun for Thomas
 

On May 24, 10:46 am, "Bob Crantz" wrote:
"Capt. Rob" wrote in message

ups.com...



Are they lowers? Nope.
Are they poor and uneducated? Generally yes. Sorry, but it's a fact.

Oh no Mr Bill!

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Nat...y/cda06-09.cfm

Mr Hands delivers another Smackdown!

ooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhh!!!!!!

You will just confuse the idiot with the facts Bob.

He'd rather quote M. Moore and think less of the people who serve and
protect this country. It's the only excuse he has to explain to his
boy why he failed to serve his country. He likes to think of himself
as superior to the poor under educated unlucky sad sacks that have to
join, to keep from starving or going to jail.

Joe

Fun for Thomas
 

On May 24, 1:00 pm, Dave wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 12:37:43 -0400, Charlie Morgan said:

As opposed to "The Heritage Foundation"?

Ah, the old "if you can't deal with the argument attack the source"
technique.

Yeah, I guess BB the dunce missed this part:

[7] U.S. Department of Defense, Population Representation in the
Military Services, Fiscal Year 2004,p. 3-11.

[8] Ibid., p. 2-22.

[9] For example, see Bowman, "Lowered Standards Help Army Meet Recruit
Goals."

[10] Ibid., p. 1-3, and U.S. Department of Defense, Population
Representation in the Military Services, Fiscal Year 2005, Table B-8.

[11] Race cannot be examined on an individual five-digit ZCTA level
because the Census Bureau supplies data only for com*bined regions
with the same first three ZCTA digits.

[12] "Population" refers to U.S. Census population estimates for each
year for the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. It excludes
Puerto Rico. U.S. Census Bureau, Population Change: July 1, 2002, to
July 1, 2003, at http://www.census.gov/popest/states/...POPCHG2004.csv
(October 13, 2006).

[13] Kane, "Who Bears the Burden?"

[14] For more information on ZCTAs, see U.S. Census Bureau, "Zip Code
Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs)," April 16, 2001, at www.census.gov/geo/ZCTA/zcta.html
(July 6, 2006).

[15] U.S. Census Bureau, United States Census 2000, Summary File 1, at
http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/.../sumfile1.html (July 6, 2006),
and Summary File 3, at http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/.../sumfile3.html
(July 6, 2006).


[16] U.S. Census Bureau, 2004 American Community Survey, Table S1501,
at http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/.../sumfile1.html (July 6, 2006);
Table B02001, at http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet...o_id=01000US&-
ds_name=ACS_2004_EST_G00_&-mt_name=ACS_2004_EST_G2000_B02001 (July 6,
2006); and Table B03001, at http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet...le?_bm=y&-geo_
id=01000US&-ds_name=ACS_2004_EST_G00_&-_lang=en&-redoLog=false&
-mt_name=ACS_2004_EST_G2000_B03001&-currentselections=ACS_2004_
EST_G2000_B03001&-CONTEXT=dt (August 9, 2006).

[17] U.S. Census Bureau, 2005 Population Estimates, Table GCT-T1-R, at
http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet..._id=01000US&-_
box_head_nbr=GCT-T1-R&-ds_name=PEP_2005_EST&-format=US-9S(July 6,
2006).

Joe

Fun for Thomas
 

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...

You goonybirds are smacking yourselves down.

CWM

And you just got smacked from the left:

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1103-21.htm


Moo-hoo-hoo-haa-haaa!!!!!!

Fun for Thomas
 

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On 24 May 2007 14:29:04 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Thu, 24 May 2007 15:14:34 -0400, Charlie Morgan said:

Now, now Joe. I'm sure Charlie has facts readily at hand to dispute the
conclusions reached by the HF. I eagerly await his presentation of those
facts.


Well, Dave, I tried to look at it from Joe's point of view, and also
from yours. I was physically unable to get my head that far up my ass.

So I take it you don't have those facts?

So, I take you have absolutely no idea whether I have the facts or
not? You also have not confirmed from reliable independent sources
that Joe or the Heritage Foundation have presented any facts.

Joe has certainly provided more source info than you have, reliable or
otherwise.

Max

Fun for Thomas
 

"Bob Crantz" wrote in message
...

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...

You goonybirds are smacking yourselves down.

CWM

And you just got smacked from the left:

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1103-21.htm


Moo-hoo-hoo-haa-haaa!!!!!!


Getting smacked from the left must be the ultimate put-down for a liberal.

Max

Fun for Thomas
 

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 24 May 2007 13:34:05 -0600, "Bob Crantz"
said:

And you just got smacked from the left:

Interesting. The Marine reservist just down the hall from me, who recently
came back from a tour in Iraq, has an Ivy degree.

As we've witnessed from BB, that doesn't seem to hold much credence any
longer.

Max

Fun for Thomas
 

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
Ask Dave where he got his law degree, dumbass.

CWM

Cracker Jack box?

Wilbur Hubbard

Fun for Thomas
 

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:17:49 GMT, "Maxprop" wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
. ..
On 24 May 2007 14:29:04 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Thu, 24 May 2007 15:14:34 -0400, Charlie Morgan
said:

Now, now Joe. I'm sure Charlie has facts readily at hand to dispute
the
conclusions reached by the HF. I eagerly await his presentation of
those
facts.


Well, Dave, I tried to look at it from Joe's point of view, and also
from yours. I was physically unable to get my head that far up my ass.

So I take it you don't have those facts?

So, I take you have absolutely no idea whether I have the facts or
not? You also have not confirmed from reliable independent sources
that Joe or the Heritage Foundation have presented any facts.

Joe has certainly provided more source info than you have, reliable or
otherwise.

Max


So, unproven sources that are unreliable are okay with you? No wonder you
are so
screwed up.

Nope. I never said, or even inferred it. Of course I realize you are
challenged w/r/t English language, so I'll explain it in 7th grade terms
that you might be able to comprehend: I only noted that Joe and others have
provided references, valid or invalid, while you've done nothing more than
launch ad hominem attacks against Joe, Dave, and the sources themselves.
You've provided nothing but your opinion and vitriol = nada.

A 1000 sq foot retail establishment that doesn't gross over a million
dollars a
year is a hobby. You have two locations split how many ways? Maybe you
should
switch to selling custom Tee-shirts so you could make some money.

Ours are professional offices, not retail establishments. I'm not surprised
that you are too obtuse to make that distinction. You've also chosen to
ignore the fact that I said we grossed well into seven figures. Since you
can't seem to fathom the range that implies, it encompasses everything from
a million to one dollar short of ten million. The exact amount is none of
your business, but let it suffice that nothing you will ever do can even
begin to approach what we do, either professionally or monetarily.

Jealousy and envy are particularly ugly character traits, BB, but when
they're all you have I suppose they will have to suffice.

Max

Fun for Thomas
 

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:20:36 GMT, "Maxprop" wrote:


"Dave" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 24 May 2007 13:34:05 -0600, "Bob Crantz"

said:

And you just got smacked from the left:

Interesting. The Marine reservist just down the hall from me, who
recently
came back from a tour in Iraq, has an Ivy degree.

As we've witnessed from BB, that doesn't seem to hold much credence any
longer.

Max


Ask Dave where he got his law degree, dumbass.

Most unfortunate for him that you've claimed to have attended an Ivy League
school. Tell us--did you graduate from that Ivy League school, or did you
finish up at the local community college? Or did you obtain a degree at
all? Certainly nothing you've ever said would imply you have beyond a 7th
grade education.

Max

Fun for Thomas
 

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On 24 May 2007 14:06:02 -0500, Dave wrote:

Now, now Joe. I'm sure Charlie has facts readily at hand to dispute the
conclusions reached by the HF. I eagerly await his presentation of those
facts.


Well, Dave, I tried to look at it from Joe's point of view, and also
from yours. I was physically unable to get my head that far up my ass.

CWM

No wonder, with Joe's AND Dave's heads already up you butt. I'm amazed you
got it in at all.

Fun for Thomas
 

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 25 May 2007 03:16:45 GMT, "Maxprop" wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:17:49 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
m...
On 24 May 2007 14:29:04 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Thu, 24 May 2007 15:14:34 -0400, Charlie Morgan
said:

Now, now Joe. I'm sure Charlie has facts readily at hand to dispute
the
conclusions reached by the HF. I eagerly await his presentation of
those
facts.


Well, Dave, I tried to look at it from Joe's point of view, and also
from yours. I was physically unable to get my head that far up my
ass.

So I take it you don't have those facts?

So, I take you have absolutely no idea whether I have the facts or
not? You also have not confirmed from reliable independent sources
that Joe or the Heritage Foundation have presented any facts.

Joe has certainly provided more source info than you have, reliable or
otherwise.

Max


So, unproven sources that are unreliable are okay with you? No wonder
you
are so
screwed up.

Nope. I never said, or even inferred it. Of course I realize you are
challenged w/r/t English language, so I'll explain it in 7th grade terms
that you might be able to comprehend: I only noted that Joe and others
have
provided references, valid or invalid, while you've done nothing more than
launch ad hominem attacks against Joe, Dave, and the sources themselves.
You've provided nothing but your opinion and vitriol = nada.


Of what value are invalid references, Max? Do they carry more weight than
no
references in your estimation? You've said it at least twice now.

Invalid by whose decree? Yours? Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Any reference, invalid or otherwise, is superior to your personal attacks.
Of course you are far too slow to comprehend the concept.

Max

Fun for Thomas
 

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 May 2007 04:24:15 GMT, "Maxprop" wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 25 May 2007 03:16:45 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:17:49 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
news:lspb53dj5q2u4ker7d5528170qne603rb3@4ax. com...
On 24 May 2007 14:29:04 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Thu, 24 May 2007 15:14:34 -0400, Charlie Morgan
said:

Now, now Joe. I'm sure Charlie has facts readily at hand to
dispute
the
conclusions reached by the HF. I eagerly await his presentation of
those
facts.


Well, Dave, I tried to look at it from Joe's point of view, and
also
from yours. I was physically unable to get my head that far up my
ass.

So I take it you don't have those facts?

So, I take you have absolutely no idea whether I have the facts or
not? You also have not confirmed from reliable independent sources
that Joe or the Heritage Foundation have presented any facts.

Joe has certainly provided more source info than you have, reliable or
otherwise.

Max


So, unproven sources that are unreliable are okay with you? No wonder
you
are so
screwed up.

Nope. I never said, or even inferred it. Of course I realize you are
challenged w/r/t English language, so I'll explain it in 7th grade terms
that you might be able to comprehend: I only noted that Joe and others
have
provided references, valid or invalid, while you've done nothing more
than
launch ad hominem attacks against Joe, Dave, and the sources themselves.
You've provided nothing but your opinion and vitriol = nada.


Of what value are invalid references, Max? Do they carry more weight
than
no
references in your estimation? You've said it at least twice now.

Invalid by whose decree? Yours? Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Any reference, invalid or otherwise, is superior to your personal attacks.
Of course you are far too slow to comprehend the concept.

Max


No wonder you ended up in trade school.

C'mon, BB, get past the envy. There's no disgrace in working in a factory.
It's honest labor and a necessity for our economic system. Your failure to
graduate from college shouldn't leave you bitter and jealous of others with
more success. Buck up fella.

Max

Fun for Thomas
 

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 May 2007 23:35:48 GMT, "Maxprop" wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 29 May 2007 04:24:15 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
m...
On Fri, 25 May 2007 03:16:45 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
news:uk7c531345naik17jbfh8jhnqo56j0a0tc@4ax. com...
On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:17:49 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
news:lspb53dj5q2u4ker7d5528170qne603rb3@4a x.com...
On 24 May 2007 14:29:04 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Thu, 24 May 2007 15:14:34 -0400, Charlie Morgan

said:

Now, now Joe. I'm sure Charlie has facts readily at hand to
dispute
the
conclusions reached by the HF. I eagerly await his presentation
of
those
facts.


Well, Dave, I tried to look at it from Joe's point of view, and
also
from yours. I was physically unable to get my head that far up my
ass.

So I take it you don't have those facts?

So, I take you have absolutely no idea whether I have the facts or
not? You also have not confirmed from reliable independent sources
that Joe or the Heritage Foundation have presented any facts.

Joe has certainly provided more source info than you have, reliable
or
otherwise.

Max


So, unproven sources that are unreliable are okay with you? No
wonder
you
are so
screwed up.

Nope. I never said, or even inferred it. Of course I realize you are
challenged w/r/t English language, so I'll explain it in 7th grade
terms
that you might be able to comprehend: I only noted that Joe and
others
have
provided references, valid or invalid, while you've done nothing more
than
launch ad hominem attacks against Joe, Dave, and the sources
themselves.
You've provided nothing but your opinion and vitriol = nada.


Of what value are invalid references, Max? Do they carry more weight
than
no
references in your estimation? You've said it at least twice now.

Invalid by whose decree? Yours? Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Any reference, invalid or otherwise, is superior to your personal
attacks.
Of course you are far too slow to comprehend the concept.

Max


No wonder you ended up in trade school.

C'mon, BB, get past the envy. There's no disgrace in working in a
factory.
It's honest labor and a necessity for our economic system. Your failure
to
graduate from college shouldn't leave you bitter and jealous of others
with
more success. Buck up fella.

Max


Bwhahahahahahaha!

That's more like it. Shake off those feelings of inferiority, despite the
truth of the matter.

Max

Fun for Thomas
 

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:35:00 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 29 May 2007 23:35:48 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
m...
On Tue, 29 May 2007 04:24:15 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
news:faed53laevbm81v3b6c9aa0cr05fs3fh1n@4ax. com...
On Fri, 25 May 2007 03:16:45 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
news:uk7c531345naik17jbfh8jhnqo56j0a0tc@4a x.com...
On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:17:49 GMT, "Maxprop"

wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
news:lspb53dj5q2u4ker7d5528170qne603rb3@ 4ax.com...
On 24 May 2007 14:29:04 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Thu, 24 May 2007 15:14:34 -0400, Charlie Morgan

said:

Now, now Joe. I'm sure Charlie has facts readily at hand to
dispute
the
conclusions reached by the HF. I eagerly await his
presentation
of
those
facts.


Well, Dave, I tried to look at it from Joe's point of view, and
also
from yours. I was physically unable to get my head that far up
my
ass.

So I take it you don't have those facts?

So, I take you have absolutely no idea whether I have the facts
or
not? You also have not confirmed from reliable independent
sources
that Joe or the Heritage Foundation have presented any facts.

Joe has certainly provided more source info than you have,
reliable
or
otherwise.

Max


So, unproven sources that are unreliable are okay with you? No
wonder
you
are so
screwed up.

Nope. I never said, or even inferred it. Of course I realize you
are
challenged w/r/t English language, so I'll explain it in 7th grade
terms
that you might be able to comprehend: I only noted that Joe and
others
have
provided references, valid or invalid, while you've done nothing
more
than
launch ad hominem attacks against Joe, Dave, and the sources
themselves.
You've provided nothing but your opinion and vitriol = nada.


Of what value are invalid references, Max? Do they carry more weight
than
no
references in your estimation? You've said it at least twice now.

Invalid by whose decree? Yours? Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Any reference, invalid or otherwise, is superior to your personal
attacks.
Of course you are far too slow to comprehend the concept.

Max


No wonder you ended up in trade school.

C'mon, BB, get past the envy. There's no disgrace in working in a
factory.
It's honest labor and a necessity for our economic system. Your failure
to
graduate from college shouldn't leave you bitter and jealous of others
with
more success. Buck up fella.

Max


Bwhahahahahahaha!

That's more like it. Shake off those feelings of inferiority, despite the
truth of the matter.

Max


Look at the defeated Max bow before me. He needs my approval now more
than ever.

Tsk, tsk. And you were doing so well, BB.

Max