"Joe" wrote in message
ups.com...
On May 22, 9:45 am, katy wrote:
Joe wrote:
Was the wind created

Did the wind create itself out of nothing?

Is the wind eternal?

Joe

What? You didn't take Earth Science in high school?

Yes I did, one of my favorite subjects. I fully understand the
dynamics of wind.

Let me re-phrase the question for you Katy.

Did all of the dynamics that need to be in place to make winds just
appear one day on it's own with design or fore thought, or did it
require some creation?

An intelligent design?

And since we know the dynamics of wind are produced by the variations
of temp on the earth we have to assume the earth and the universe are
included in the basics formulations to answering the questions.

Albert Einstein acknowledges that the mind behind the universe is a
"superintelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the
systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly
insignificant reflection." and yet people like Rob do not accept a
higher intelligent or creator of all including the wind.

He thinks he is superior to all, he thinks he created life.

Joe

The "god" behind the universe is so complex that perfection is defined by
entropy.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 22 May 2007 14:35:58 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote:


"Joe" wrote in message
roups.com...
On May 22, 9:45 am, katy wrote:
Joe wrote:
Was the wind created

Did the wind create itself out of nothing?

Is the wind eternal?

Joe

What? You didn't take Earth Science in high school?

Yes I did, one of my favorite subjects. I fully understand the
dynamics of wind.

Let me re-phrase the question for you Katy.

Did all of the dynamics that need to be in place to make winds just
appear one day on it's own with design or fore thought, or did it
require some creation?

An intelligent design?

And since we know the dynamics of wind are produced by the variations
of temp on the earth we have to assume the earth and the universe are
included in the basics formulations to answering the questions.

Albert Einstein acknowledges that the mind behind the universe is a
"superintelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the
systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly
insignificant reflection." and yet people like Rob do not accept a
higher intelligent or creator of all including the wind.

He thinks he is superior to all, he thinks he created life.

Joe


I also believe in a Supreme Being who created all things. I also call
Him God or Father.

Any sane person cannot think the entire universe just came into
existence by accident or something. Even mundane things like people,
take Katy and Ganz, for example, prove there is a God. There's good and
there's evil. The aforementioned are an example of the latter. God has
also prepared a place for them but not in Heaven.

People like Bobsplat and Bitty Bill are examples of another
manifestation of evil which is called arrogance. Such as these are
forsaken by the Lord. They will receive eternal punishment for their
folly in the same place where Katy and Ganz will suffer for all
eternity. Just punishment for their rejecting the Lord.

Wilbur Hubbard

The notion of God is a load of ********.



Neal is case in point.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Dave wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2007 14:01:55 -0400, katy said:


In 9thgrade what did you know
about earthquakes or their origins or the epochs of the earth?


It's been a long time, Katy, but IIRC the school system I was in didn't put
off such things until the 9th grade. They covered it earlier in something
called "science."

You learned mineral classification, how to read seismic charts,
determine barometric pressure and dewpoint, and read topographical maps
in grade school? My, you must have been in the Yale Prep school....I
went to a very good parochial school during grade school and while those
topics may have been mentioned or glossed over, they were not actively
studied...and I think that, for the most, aprt, that is true all
over...too bad Tad pole isn;'t here to take you to task...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...

The "god" behind the universe is so complex that perfection is defined
by entropy.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com



Is that you or the LSD speaking?

On 22 May 2007 07:03:48 -0700, Joe wrote
this crap:

Was the wind created

Did the wind create itself out of nothing?

Political speeches.

Is the wind eternal?

Check the Congressional Record.




This post is 100% free of steroids

Earth science is not a basic science. It is based upon physics, chemistry
and biology. In my high skool days those of lesser talents took earth
science. One could not master earth science without mastering physics,
chemistry and biology.

Ever wonder why there is such great debate over global warming? But yet not
much argument over Stokes Theorem? Anyone and everyone can be an earth
scientist, just ask Al Gore.

Earth science in high school is a basic regurgitation of complex principles
that may not even be understood by experts in the field. When one throws in
the mathematical skills required to correctly model earth systems I doubt
there are even 1000 people worldwide extremely competent in the field.

Dave wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2007 16:34:34 -0400, katy said:


My, you must have been in the Yale Prep school.


Actually, I attended a public school in a state where the public school
students do better academically than private school students. The public
schools may have slipped a bit from my day, but I see they are still the #1
state in the nation in the proportion of students who get a score high
enough to earn college credit on an Advanced Placement (AP) Science exam.

This is from the New York State Department of Education...current...:
http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/osa/hssci.html

Bob Crantz wrote:
Earth science is not a basic science. It is based upon physics, chemistry
and biology. In my high skool days those of lesser talents took earth
science. One could not master earth science without mastering physics,
chemistry and biology.

Ever wonder why there is such great debate over global warming? But yet not
much argument over Stokes Theorem? Anyone and everyone can be an earth
scientist, just ask Al Gore.

Earth science in high school is a basic regurgitation of complex principles
that may not even be understood by experts in the field. When one throws in
the mathematical skills required to correctly model earth systems I doubt
there are even 1000 people worldwide extremely competent in the field.



You're full of carboniferous e coli infested waste material...

"katy" wrote in message
...
Bob Crantz wrote:
Earth science is not a basic science. It is based upon physics, chemistry
and biology. In my high skool days those of lesser talents took earth
science. One could not master earth science without mastering physics,
chemistry and biology.

Ever wonder why there is such great debate over global warming? But yet
not much argument over Stokes Theorem? Anyone and everyone can be an
earth scientist, just ask Al Gore.

Earth science in high school is a basic regurgitation of complex
principles that may not even be understood by experts in the field. When
one throws in the mathematical skills required to correctly model earth
systems I doubt there are even 1000 people worldwide extremely competent
in the field.



You're full of carboniferous e coli infested waste material...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_science


http://www.albany.edu/geosciences/geolesbs.html

A BS in Engineering requires over double the math, physics and chemistry.
In fact, real colleges:

http://www.mines.edu/index_js.shtml

won't even consider offering a course of study in "earth science". "Earth
Science" is a degree used for teaching science in schools. That's the only
job you can get with that degree.

Earth science is a bit light on the "science" part. Let's put it this way,
if RB ever managed to get a science related degree, it would most likely be
in earth science.

* Bob Crantz wrote, On 5/22/2007 9:54 PM:
"katy" wrote in message
...
Bob Crantz wrote:
Earth science is not a basic science. It is based upon physics, chemistry
and biology. In my high skool days those of lesser talents took earth
science. One could not master earth science without mastering physics,
chemistry and biology.

Ever wonder why there is such great debate over global warming? But yet
not much argument over Stokes Theorem? Anyone and everyone can be an
earth scientist, just ask Al Gore.

Earth science in high school is a basic regurgitation of complex
principles that may not even be understood by experts in the field. When
one throws in the mathematical skills required to correctly model earth
systems I doubt there are even 1000 people worldwide extremely competent
in the field.



You're full of carboniferous e coli infested waste material...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_science


http://www.albany.edu/geosciences/geolesbs.html

A BS in Engineering requires over double the math, physics and chemistry.
In fact, real colleges:

http://www.mines.edu/index_js.shtml

won't even consider offering a course of study in "earth science". "Earth
Science" is a degree used for teaching science in schools. That's the only
job you can get with that degree.

Earth science is a bit light on the "science" part. Let's put it this way,
if RB ever managed to get a science related degree, it would most likely be
in earth science.

I don't think they're "light" on the science he
http://eapsweb.mit.edu/