Imus's situation is that's he's a victim of circumstances. The
circumstance is he was speaking out against Hillary Clinton whom he
hated with a passion and didn't mind saying so. The Clinton
attack-and-destroy machine got ahold of it's hacks, Al Sharpton and
Jesse Jackson and its media minions of ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN and they
all combined to make a giant row out of what is just normal shock jock
talk.

The hypocrisy is gut-wrenching. Here you have a pack of liberals
destroying the career of a liberal shock jock by directly attacking his
freedom of speech. These same people applaud so-called artistic
expression such as figures of Jesus smeared with human feces. They are
all against artistic censorship when it's to their advantage to be but
if the artistic expression of a shock jock using speech involves
criticism of Hillary Clinton they MUST eliminate the source via
censorship. Now, while they cannot come out and say we got him fired
because he said bad things about Hillary, they can and did get Imus
because he said something about which they could play the race card.
Never mind they are all for the artistic expression of rappers and
hip-hoppers who use the same words or worse. It's blatant and obvious.
You watch, the list of people who are next in line for censorship will
ALL be people who are anti-Hillary.

It's real apparent to me this is what's at the root of this whole
affair. Why has nobody in the liberal media made mention of it? It's
simply because it would be working against the liberal agenda to do so.
The liberal agenda is Hillary Clinton and don't you forget it.

Wilbur Hubbard

"Many of you are well enough off that...the tax cuts may have helped
you. We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably
going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take
things away from you on behalf of the common good." -- Hillary Clinton

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:29:18 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
said:

It's real apparent to me this is what's at the root of this whole
affair. Why has nobody in the liberal media made mention of it?

You're making up fantasies again, Neal. Actually, Rosie came down on
Imus's
side, as did Susan Estrich, with whom I also seldom agree, in her
column of
today.

But does Rosie speak out vehemently against Hillary? Not that I've heard
of. She may even be a Hillary supporter, for all I know. As for Susan
Estrich I have this to say. . . "WHO?" Anyway my point stands. It's the
Clinton political machine that's behind the recent attempts to smear and
destroy any and all who speak out against "Her Thighness." And if you
don't believe me, please note how, in the next year or two, NOT ONE
SINGLE SOLITARY SOUL who supports Hillary, no matter how politically
incorrect are the words he or she utters, will be destroyed by the
liberal media while any and all who publicly speak out against her,
liberal or conservative (but especially liberal because she needs
liberal votes) will either be destroyed or have an attempt made to
destroy them.

I'm rarely wrong about politics. I have a very keen political mind.
Well, actually, I should just say I have a very keen mind period and be
done with it . . .

Wilbur Hubbard

"Dave" wrote in message
...
How many legs does a sheep have it you call its tail a leg?

Red!

Wilbur Hubbard