Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonathan Ganz wrote:
In article , katy wrote: Maxprop wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:55:06 -0400, katy said: From memory didn't it say unemployment was less than 5% and that although sloppy, the housing market was pretty much stable? And that durable goods were doing fine? Jon's hilarious. He's been claiming the economy is in the crapper constantly since at least 2002. I can't wait until we have a (by the Democrat definition) 'recovery.' My business is immensely prosperous now--it should be off the charts then. Max No..ythere will be socialized medicine and you will retire and remember the good old days... Not interested in socialized medicine, but what do you think should be done about the 47 millions currently without healthcare ins and the millions more without adequate ins? Contained within those numbers are the thousands upon thousands who receive Medicaid and who also are never refused treatment at hospitals emergency rooms...yes...there is a problem with health care in this country...and it is not limited to just the poor...my solution? We should get rid of health care insurance entirely and go back to paying doctors out odf pocket...that way the industry would correct itslef..there would always be charities, as before health insurance, to pick up for those that cna't pay...I know the amounts that are spent on our BCBS policy...we pay half out of pocket plus deductibles etc. There is no way in current history that we spend that amount on "real" actual health care...instead of paying out 9-12 K/annumto an insurance company it couldgo into a specialized medical account..one NOT set up by insurance companies like is currently ptacticed...the price of health care would level out to where it is reasonable, litigation would stop driving the prices higher and higher, doctors would no longer have to order unnecessary tests for fear of litigation...arbitration would take on a real and active role rather than using the jury system... |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
katy wrote: Contained within those numbers are the thousands upon thousands who receive Medicaid and who also are never refused treatment at hospitals emergency rooms...yes...there is a problem with health care in this While most, but not all, are given treatment, there are fewer and fewer hospitals equiped to deal with emergency care... care that wouldn't have be emergencies if they had access to preventative treatment. ER is very, very expensive, and if the person can't pay, we pay. Since people don't have ins, they tend to wait until the situation is dire, which complicates treatment and recovery. country...and it is not limited to just the poor...my solution? We should get rid of health care insurance entirely and go back to paying doctors out odf pocket...that way the industry would correct How do you expect people who are maybe getting minimum wage or have 3/4 kids to pay out of pocket? It might "correct" itself, but between now and then, many people would die as a result. itslef..there would always be charities, as before health insurance, to pick up for those that cna't pay...I know the amounts that are spent on our BCBS policy...we pay half out of pocket plus deductibles etc. There is no way in current history that we spend that amount on "real" actual health care...instead of paying out 9-12 K/annumto an insurance company it couldgo into a specialized medical account..one NOT set up by insurance companies like is currently ptacticed...the price of health care would level out to where it is reasonable, litigation would stop driving the prices higher and higher, doctors would no longer have to order unnecessary tests for fear of litigation...arbitration would take on a real and active role rather than using the jury system... We need some sort of single-payer option for people... not mandatory, but available. -- Capt. JG @@ www.sailnow.com |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonathan Ganz wrote:
In article , katy wrote: Contained within those numbers are the thousands upon thousands who receive Medicaid and who also are never refused treatment at hospitals emergency rooms...yes...there is a problem with health care in this While most, but not all, are given treatment, there are fewer and fewer hospitals equiped to deal with emergency care... care that wouldn't have be emergencies if they had access to preventative treatment. ER is very, very expensive, and if the person can't pay, we pay. Since people don't have ins, they tend to wait until the situation is dire, which complicates treatment and recovery. Sometimes I wonder what world you live in. I worled in the ehalth care system on and off all my life. I can tell you that the emergency room is the most abused medical facility that exists. I don't have the actual statistics but I can guess that 1 out of every 10 patients is an emergency. That is one of the major reasons insurance companies will now no longer pay for the actual ER fee if there is not a procedure done or an admission...as far as the "we pay" part, we will pay no matter what for that particular segment of society that can't afford it. We pay through taxes or through chartible contributions. What does it matter what form it takes? country...and it is not limited to just the poor...my solution? We should get rid of health care insurance entirely and go back to paying doctors out odf pocket...that way the industry would correct How do you expect people who are maybe getting minimum wage or have 3/4 kids to pay out of pocket? It might "correct" itself, but between now and then, many people would die as a result. The problem is not that there isn't health care, it's that people don;t know where to go to look for it...there are all sorts of prtograms that are underused...when I was in HR I had a list of health services that were available at either a gratis rate or fee based on pay...clinics run by the county and some run by local churches...yet our employees, for the most part young black women between 20-30 with 2-3 children (paid BTW, over $10/hr) would still go to the ER when their kids had colds. ANd we offered excellent inexpensive HMO insurance which the majority opted to not buy into...many of the pharmaceutical companies have need based programs now and I know that there are physicians out there that will do necessary surgery for those who are desperately in need and can't pay...Some will die, you say...well, this is going to flame you...not enough people are dying in this country..the lengths we go to to keep people alive is ridiculous...when people have to start paying for 350K heart surgeries at the age of 80 then maybe there will be a wake up call...you would think the whole country believes its going to Hell when you look at our fear of dying...Dying is the inevitable end that is supposed to happen, sooner for some than for others... |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
katy wrote: While most, but not all, are given treatment, there are fewer and fewer hospitals equiped to deal with emergency care... care that wouldn't have be emergencies if they had access to preventative treatment. ER is very, very expensive, and if the person can't pay, we pay. Since people don't have ins, they tend to wait until the situation is dire, which complicates treatment and recovery. Sometimes I wonder what world you live in. I worled in the ehalth care system on and off all my life. I can tell you that the emergency room is the most abused medical facility that exists. I don't have the actual I live in the real world... Didn't I just say that in other words? It is highly abused for a couple of reasons. Certainly, people cheat, but the vast majority of abuse is because people can't pay for a regular doc. statistics but I can guess that 1 out of every 10 patients is an emergency. That is one of the major reasons insurance companies will now no longer pay for the actual ER fee if there is not a procedure done or Well, sure... I can't imagine them paying for a checkup, but I'm not talking about that kind of visit. I'm talking about the heart attacks, pneumonia cases, serious stuff, that are preventable with decent healthcare on a regular basis. an admission...as far as the "we pay" part, we will pay no matter what for that particular segment of society that can't afford it. We pay through taxes or through chartible contributions. What does it matter what form it takes? It matter quite a bit... we pay far more for ER care that shouldn't be necessary if those people were covered by ins. country...and it is not limited to just the poor...my solution? We should get rid of health care insurance entirely and go back to paying doctors out odf pocket...that way the industry would correct How do you expect people who are maybe getting minimum wage or have 3/4 kids to pay out of pocket? It might "correct" itself, but between now and then, many people would die as a result. The problem is not that there isn't health care, it's that people don;t know where to go to look for it...there are all sorts of prtograms that NO. It's that people can't AFFORD IT! Costs continue to skyrocket with no end in sight. -- Capt. JG @@ www.sailnow.com |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonathan Ganz wrote:
In article , katy wrote: While most, but not all, are given treatment, there are fewer and fewer hospitals equiped to deal with emergency care... care that wouldn't have be emergencies if they had access to preventative treatment. ER is very, very expensive, and if the person can't pay, we pay. Since people don't have ins, they tend to wait until the situation is dire, which complicates treatment and recovery. Sometimes I wonder what world you live in. I worled in the ehalth care system on and off all my life. I can tell you that the emergency room is the most abused medical facility that exists. I don't have the actual I live in the real world... Didn't I just say that in other words? It is highly abused for a couple of reasons. Certainly, people cheat, but the vast majority of abuse is because people can't pay for a regular doc. statistics but I can guess that 1 out of every 10 patients is an emergency. That is one of the major reasons insurance companies will now no longer pay for the actual ER fee if there is not a procedure done or Well, sure... I can't imagine them paying for a checkup, but I'm not talking about that kind of visit. I'm talking about the heart attacks, pneumonia cases, serious stuff, that are preventable with decent healthcare on a regular basis. an admission...as far as the "we pay" part, we will pay no matter what for that particular segment of society that can't afford it. We pay through taxes or through chartible contributions. What does it matter what form it takes? It matter quite a bit... we pay far more for ER care that shouldn't be necessary if those people were covered by ins. country...and it is not limited to just the poor...my solution? We should get rid of health care insurance entirely and go back to paying doctors out odf pocket...that way the industry would correct How do you expect people who are maybe getting minimum wage or have 3/4 kids to pay out of pocket? It might "correct" itself, but between now and then, many people would die as a result. The problem is not that there isn't health care, it's that people don;t know where to go to look for it...there are all sorts of prtograms that NO. It's that people can't AFFORD IT! Costs continue to skyrocket with no end in sight. Got news for you Jon...those people, with insurance, STILL USE THE ER!!!!!! Been there...seen it.... |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
katy wrote: Got news for you Jon...those people, with insurance, STILL USE THE ER!!!!!! Been there...seen it.... Those people?? Don't feel you have to be specific. Are you now claiming that the majority of those who use the ER for non-ER help are the insured? -- Capt. JG @@ www.sailnow.com |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonathan Ganz wrote:
In article , katy wrote: Got news for you Jon...those people, with insurance, STILL USE THE ER!!!!!! Been there...seen it.... Those people?? Don't feel you have to be specific. Are you now claiming that the majority of those who use the ER for non-ER help are the insured? Many....many people use the ER if they can't get into their family doctir right away rather than waiting or using a Med Station...I can never figure that one out since ER's are rife with bacteria and the chances are that if you weren't sick when you went in you will be when you leave... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Flying Pig Damage Assessment and update | Boat Building | |||
Flying Pig Damage Assessment and update | Cruising |