"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

miguel wrote in
:

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology, wrote:
miguel said:
Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department
of Psychology
(http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote:
miguel said:
Dumbarse Git wrote:
miguel:

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside:

You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which
you admit to in another thread),

You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my
occupation.

I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse
Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth
and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key.

yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the
(alleged) institution and precise location of someone else.

I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments
ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody
please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award?
I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about
the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense
to said award.

If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside,
Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and
occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she
has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their
posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she
needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the
google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about
stopping yourself.

Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.

You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this,
what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you
all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your
choice.

The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour
to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on
your behalf?

It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.

Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and
let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his
unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry,
I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past
pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had
realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their
kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests.

Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University
of Wisconsin-Parkside,
http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/

Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or
voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making
entertainment out of a bully.

And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does
affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you
hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your
defense of him and wish you'd stop.

I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with
people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having
asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain
get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a
way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me.

Perhaps soon you may miss those days too.

You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you
decided to join in. So solly.

Threat noted.

I hope so.

If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are,
frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy to
pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois hold the
keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of
Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology.

Wow. Extortion attempt.

No.

It's negotiation: Everyone stops.

The problem is, you give every indication of holding the belief that you
should be able to continue what you started and that Mike has no right
to attempt to mitigate his damages.

Equity is for everyone, Sean.

Yo, Moonbeam - we[TINW] have a new submission for the Bobo pool.
Pleace to consider this frothing maniac for odds. Thanks in advance.

http://www.alcatroll.com/sean/miguel

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" post-humping my nominations
again, wrote in :

"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

miguel wrote in
:

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology, wrote:
miguel said:
Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department
of Psychology
(http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/)
wrote:
miguel said:
Dumbarse Git wrote:
miguel:

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside:

You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which
you admit to in another thread),

You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my
occupation.

I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse
Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth
and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key.

yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the
(alleged) institution and precise location of someone else.

I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments
ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody
please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award?
I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about
the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense
to said award.

If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside,
Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and
occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she
has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their
posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she
needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the
google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about
stopping yourself.

Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.

You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this,
what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you
all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your
choice.

The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour
to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise
on your behalf?

It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.

Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and
let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his
unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry,
I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past
pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had
realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their
kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests.

Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University
of Wisconsin-Parkside,
http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/

Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or
voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making
entertainment out of a bully.

And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does
affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you
hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your
defense of him and wish you'd stop.

I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with
people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having
asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain
get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a
way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me.

Perhaps soon you may miss those days too.

You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact
you decided to join in. So solly.

Threat noted.

I hope so.

If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are,
frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy
to pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois hold
the keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of
Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology.

Wow. Extortion attempt.

No.

It's negotiation: Everyone stops.

The problem is, you give every indication of holding the belief that
you should be able to continue what you started and that Mike has no
right to attempt to mitigate his damages.

Equity is for everyone, Sean.

Are you *really* this thick?!?!? Why, pray tell, would the fact that I
made an informative Kook-FAQ about the ****wit make it acceptable (to
you) for him to post a link to *Kali's* alleged workplace?

Hello - Kali and I are not the same person.

Yo, Moonbeam - we[TINW] have a new submission for the Bobo pool.
Pleace to consider this frothing maniac for odds. Thanks in advance.

http://www.alcatroll.com/sean/miguel


--
Official FAQ for Alt.Usenet.Kooks: http://www.caballista.org/auk

COOSN-266-06-58907

Hammer of Thor - August 2005

Pierre Salinger Memorial "Hook, Line & Sinker" awards -
March 2005, July 2005, August 2005, August 2006, February 2007

[Co]Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler

"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" post-humping my nominations
again, wrote in :

"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

miguel wrote in
:

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department
of Psychology, wrote:
miguel said:
Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department
of Psychology
(http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/)
wrote:
miguel said:
Dumbarse Git wrote:
miguel:

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside:

You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation
(which you admit to in another thread),

You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my
occupation.

I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse
Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the
froth and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key.

yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the
(alleged) institution and precise location of someone else.

I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments
ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody
please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award?
I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about
the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense
to said award.

If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside,
Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and
occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she
has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their
posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she
needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the
google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about
stopping yourself.

Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.

You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this,
what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If
you all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your
choice.

The question is - will your public defender find this
behaviour to be acceptable, or will that person continue to
rationalise on your behalf?

It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.

Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and
let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his
unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry,
I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past
pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had
realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their
kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests.

Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard,
University of Wisconsin-Parkside,
http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/

Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or
voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making
entertainment out of a bully.

And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does
affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you
hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your
defense of him and wish you'd stop.

I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with
people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without
having asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and
****stain get all my identifying information out front and
center, and in a way that will cause reputational and commercial
damage to me.

Perhaps soon you may miss those days too.

You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact
you decided to join in. So solly.

Threat noted.

I hope so.

If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are,
frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy
to pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois hold
the keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of
Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology.

Wow. Extortion attempt.

No.

It's negotiation: Everyone stops.

The problem is, you give every indication of holding the belief that
you should be able to continue what you started and that Mike has no
right to attempt to mitigate his damages.

Equity is for everyone, Sean.

Are you *really* this thick?!?!?

Would that be another one of those abusive ad homs?

Why, pray tell, would the fact that
I made an informative Kook-FAQ about the ****wit make it acceptable
(to you) for him to post a link to *Kali's* alleged workplace?

Bzzzt.

http://www.fallacyfiles.org/index.html

Go find it yourself. I've got better things to do than to play "name the
fallacy."

My NPD ex-husband used to try to tie me up in knots with faulty logic. I
thought I loved him, so it never occurred to me to cut him off at the
knees.

I don't even think I love you.

Hello - Kali and I are not the same person.

laughing It would be pretty ****ing funny if you were.

Yo, Moonbeam - we[TINW] have a new submission for the Bobo pool.
Pleace to consider this frothing maniac for odds. Thanks in
advance.

http://www.alcatroll.com/sean/miguel

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

In , Rhonda Lea Kirk
said:
: "Sean Monaghan" wrote in message
:
: miguel wrote in
: :
:
: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
: Psychology, wrote:
: miguel said:
: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department
: of Psychology
: (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote:
: miguel said:
: Dumbarse Git wrote:
: miguel:
:
: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside:
:
: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which
: you admit to in another thread),
:
: You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my
: occupation.
:
: I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse
: Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth
: and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key.
:
: yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the
: (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else.
:
: I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments
: ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody
: please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award?
: I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about
: the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense
: to said award.
:
: If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside,
: Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and
: occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she
: has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their
: posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she
: needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the
: google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about
: stopping yourself.
:
: Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.
:
: You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this,
: what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you
: all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your
: choice.
:
: The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour
: to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on
: your behalf?
:
: It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.
:
: Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and
: let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his
: unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry,
: I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past
: pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had
: realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their
: kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests.
:
: Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University
: of Wisconsin-Parkside,
: http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/
:
: Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or
: voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making
: entertainment out of a bully.
:
: And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does
: affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you
: hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your
: defense of him and wish you'd stop.
:
: I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with
: people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having
: asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain
: get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a
: way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me.
:
: Perhaps soon you may miss those days too.
:
: You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you
: decided to join in. So solly.
:
: Threat noted.
:
: I hope so.
:
: If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are,
: frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy to
: pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois hold the
: keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of
: Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology.
:
: Wow. Extortion attempt.
:
: No.
:
: It's negotiation: Everyone stops.

****ing wrong, Rhonda. We discussed this the other day. I stand
by what I said, that I don't think it's right to Google stack,
and I certainly don't indend to call *anyone* a "dog****er". I
thought I made that clear.

The discussion was double standards and miguel's kooky threats.
I made an example comparison (libel and assault). In my
comparison, I used his last name and the word "dog****er". Then
your sweetheart came back and spammed my full name and office
address several times. He upped the anti. He was probably so
foamy he thought I was chiming in with the others, so instead of
seeking clarification, he shot his load, revealing his true
character: that of a coward no better than Brad Jesness. I
explained this in fewer words in an earlier post, and his
response was to repeat his cowardly behavior. No remorse, if in
fact he did jump the gun.

It wasn't negotiation, it was retaliation. Call a spade a spade.

Your "ethics" are highly conditional, aren't they?

: The problem is, you give every indication of holding the belief that you
: should be able to continue what you started and that Mike has no right
: to attempt to mitigate his damages.
:
: Equity is for everyone, Sean.
:
: Yo, Moonbeam - we[TINW] have a new submission for the Bobo pool.
: Pleace to consider this frothing maniac for odds. Thanks in advance.
:
: http://www.alcatroll.com/sean/miguel
:

Kali
--
"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called
research, would it?"
- Albert Einstein

"Kali" wrote in message

In , Rhonda Lea Kirk
said:
"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

miguel wrote in
:

snipped for clarity

If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are,
frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy
to pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois
hold the keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of
Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology.

Wow. Extortion attempt.

No.

It's negotiation: Everyone stops.

****ing wrong, Rhonda. We discussed this the other day. I stand
by what I said, that I don't think it's right to Google stack,
and I certainly don't indend to call *anyone* a "dog****er". I
thought I made that clear.

I thought you did too.

Then you posted this:

Message-ID:

The discussion was double standards and miguel's kooky threats.
I made an example comparison (libel and assault). In my
comparison, I used his last name and the word "dog****er".

That's not what I read.

And if you follow the context in date and time order, he asked for
clarification before he retaliated. Your response included calling him a
clown.

Then
your sweetheart came back and spammed my full name and office
address several times. He upped the anti. He was probably so
foamy he thought I was chiming in with the others, so instead of
seeking clarification, he shot his load, revealing his true
character: that of a coward no better than Brad Jesness. I
explained this in fewer words in an earlier post, and his
response was to repeat his cowardly behavior. No remorse, if in
fact he did jump the gun.

I have read through that part of the thread more than a few times, and
I'm not getting from there to here. See above.

It wasn't negotiation, it was retaliation. Call a spade a spade.

He retaliated, and then he offered a mutual cease-fire. It was
characterized as "extortion." I disagree that it is extortion.

What I keep hearing over and over again is that he's supposed to sit
back and let auk have its fun at his expense. If you set the standard,
you have to live with it. You said he upped the ante, but all he did was
level the field. A web page for a web page, identifying information for
identifying information.

"Fair," to me, does not mean "advantage to one side."

Your "ethics" are highly conditional, aren't they?

You called him a dog****er.

You minimized the gravity and impact of calling him a dog****er even
though I objected to it strongly many posts ago.

How does that make /my/ ethics conditional? I've been consistent about
what I think all along. And the one thing I have not done to you is
threaten loss of friendship to influence your behavior, but you did that
to me way back he


On other less talked about matters: It is unfortunate that a

so-called friend of yours and Rhonda's would show such blithe

disregard for your friendship by attacking your friends. I have higher

standards for friendship.

and

In reality, this kind of thing does have an impact on perceived

friendships.

Mike has never asked me to choose between you, and he hasn't punished me
for disagreeing with him when I thought he was wrong. Nor has he used me
as a bat against you.

Everyone is entitled to their opinon, Kali. In this case, yours and mine
do not agree.

snipped

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk said
Sean Dumbarse Git wrote
miguel wrote
Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology, wrote
miguel said
Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department
of Psychology
(http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote
miguel said
Dumbarse Git wrote
miguel

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside

You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which
you admit to in another thread),

You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my
occupation.

I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse
Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth
and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key.

yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the
(alleged) institution and precise location of someone else.

I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments
ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody
please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award?
I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about
the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense
to said award.

If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside,
Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and
occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she
has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their
posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she
needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the
google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about
stopping yourself.

Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.

You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this,
what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you
all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your
choice.

The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour
to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on
your behalf?

It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.

Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and
let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his
unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry,
I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past
pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had
realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their
kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests.

Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University
of Wisconsin-Parkside,
http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/

Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or
voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making
entertainment out of a bully.

And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does
affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you
hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your
defense of him and wish you'd stop.

I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with
people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having
asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain
get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a
way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me.

Perhaps soon you may miss those days too.

You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you
decided to join in. So solly.

Threat noted.

I hope so.

If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are,
frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy to
pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois hold the
keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of
Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology.

Wow. Extortion attempt.

No.

It's negotiation: Everyone stops.

****ing wrong, Rhonda. We discussed this the other day. I stand
by what I said, that I don't think it's right to Google stack,
and I certainly don't indend to call *anyone* a "dog****er". I
thought I made that clear.

Yet you did it anyway.

The discussion was double standards and miguel's kooky threats.
I made an example comparison (libel and assault). In my
comparison, I used his last name and the word "dog****er". Then
your sweetheart came back and spammed my full name and office
address several times. He upped the anti.

It's "ante," Doc. You probably know that in your less foamy moments,
though. And yes, I did. Sometimes that happens when you are at a poker
table.

He was probably so
foamy he thought I was chiming in with the others, so instead of
seeking clarification, he shot his load, revealing his true
character: that of a coward no better than Brad Jesness.

So it is safe to say that you consider Sean, K-Bitch, Bill and ****stain
to be no better than Brad Jesness? They have done to me precisely what I
am doing to you.

I
explained this in fewer words in an earlier post, and his
response was to repeat his cowardly behavior. No remorse, if in
fact he did jump the gun.

It wasn't negotiation, it was retaliation. Call a spade a spade.

You are not very bright, so let me spell this out for you as simply as I
can. Rhonda called my offer for a cease fire negotiation, after Sean
called it extortion. Her comment did not pertain to the original act of
posting your personal information.

Your "ethics" are highly conditional, aren't they?

You are not intelligent enough to reconcile them.

The problem is, you give every indication of holding the belief that you
should be able to continue what you started and that Mike has no right
to attempt to mitigate his damages.

Equity is for everyone, Sean.

I agree with this part of the post. 100%

Yo, Moonbeam - we[TINW] have a new submission for the Bobo pool.
Pleace to consider this frothing maniac for odds. Thanks in advance.

http//www.alcatroll.com/sean/miguel

Kali [Kimberly K. Barnard, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Parkside]

miguel

miguel wrote in
:

Kim

DYOFDW, asswipe.