Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/)
wrote:
miguel said:
Dumbarse Git wrote:
miguel:

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside:

You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you admit
to in another thread),

You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my
occupation.

I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse Git. If
I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth and spittle
from your screen before hitting the "send" key.

yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the
(alleged) institution and precise location of someone else.

I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago said
that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please nominate you
for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm beginning to think that
your intellectual prowess is about the equivalent of ****stain's, which
would be your only defense to said award.

If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the word
"dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with somebody's
name being associated with their posts on usenet, then where's the
problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is cease her
participation in the google stacking. If you are her friend, you might
think about stopping yourself.

Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.

You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what
with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want to
stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice.

The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to be
acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your behalf?

It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.

Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and
let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his
unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry,
I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past
pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had
realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their
kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests.

Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of
Wisconsin-Parkside,
http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/

Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or
voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making
entertainment out of a bully.

And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does
affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you
hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your
defense of him and wish you'd stop.

I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people on
usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole kooks
like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my
identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will
cause reputational and commercial damage to me.

Perhaps soon you may miss those days too.

You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you
decided to join in. So solly.

miguel