| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.sailing.asa,soc.singles,soc.men
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sean Monaghan wrote:
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in : "Sean Monaghan" wrote in message miguel wrote in : Kali wrote: miguel said: Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote: Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking usenet to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to accomplish. Good job there kOOk. miguel So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney? If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence. This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar. This snippet of evidence not only justifies the open KotM nomination of Michael Cranston attorney, but it also qualifies him for the Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - AUK's highest lifetime-achievement award for stupidity. From - http://www.caballista.org/auk/awards.html "Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - The spoonerism for "dumb ****", for those who've lost more marbles than a Chinese Checker factory will ever make." I hereby nominate "Michael Cranston attorney"/Miguel to become Bolo Bullis Foam Duck #27. Seconds, anyone? The nomination is ridiculous. It's interesting how say that this *nomination* is ridiculous - not Cranston's threat. How can you know whether the threat is ridiculous without knowing what predicated it? |
|
#2
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.sailing.asa,soc.singles,soc.men
|
|||
|
|||
|
miguel wrote in
: Sean Monaghan wrote: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in : "Sean Monaghan" wrote in message miguel wrote in : Kali wrote: miguel said: Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote: Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking usenet to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to accomplish. Good job there kOOk. miguel So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney? If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence. This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar. This snippet of evidence not only justifies the open KotM nomination of Michael Cranston attorney, but it also qualifies him for the Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - AUK's highest lifetime-achievement award for stupidity. From - http://www.caballista.org/auk/awards.html "Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - The spoonerism for "dumb ****", for those who've lost more marbles than a Chinese Checker factory will ever make." I hereby nominate "Michael Cranston attorney"/Miguel to become Bolo Bullis Foam Duck #27. Seconds, anyone? The nomination is ridiculous. It's interesting how say that this *nomination* is ridiculous - not Cranston's threat. How can you know whether the threat is ridiculous without knowing what predicated it? Irrelevant. The actions of one net.kook never make it okay for another to make (utterly stupid) life-threatening statements on Usenet. -- Official FAQ for Alt.Usenet.Kooks: http://www.caballista.org/auk COOSN-266-06-58907 Hammer of Thor - August 2005 Pierre Salinger Memorial "Hook, Line & Sinker" awards - March 2005, July 2005, August 2005, August 2006, February 2007 [Co]Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler |
|
#3
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.sailing.asa,soc.singles,soc.men
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message
miguel wrote in : Sean Monaghan wrote: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in : "Sean Monaghan" wrote in message miguel wrote in : Kali wrote: miguel said: Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote: Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking usenet to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to accomplish. Good job there kOOk. miguel So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney? If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence. This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar. This snippet of evidence not only justifies the open KotM nomination of Michael Cranston attorney, but it also qualifies him for the Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - AUK's highest lifetime-achievement award for stupidity. From - http://www.caballista.org/auk/awards.html "Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - The spoonerism for "dumb ****", for those who've lost more marbles than a Chinese Checker factory will ever make." I hereby nominate "Michael Cranston attorney"/Miguel to become Bolo Bullis Foam Duck #27. Seconds, anyone? The nomination is ridiculous. It's interesting how say that this *nomination* is ridiculous - not Cranston's threat. How can you know whether the threat is ridiculous without knowing what predicated it? Irrelevant. The actions of one net.kook never make it okay for another to make (utterly stupid) life-threatening statements on Usenet. Life-threatening? -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay |
|
#4
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.sailing.asa,soc.singles,soc.men
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in
: "Sean Monaghan" wrote in message miguel wrote in : Sean Monaghan wrote: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in : "Sean Monaghan" wrote in message miguel wrote in : Kali wrote: miguel said: Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote: Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking usenet to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to accomplish. Good job there kOOk. miguel So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney? If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence. This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar. This snippet of evidence not only justifies the open KotM nomination of Michael Cranston attorney, but it also qualifies him for the Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - AUK's highest lifetime-achievement award for stupidity. From - http://www.caballista.org/auk/awards.html "Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - The spoonerism for "dumb ****", for those who've lost more marbles than a Chinese Checker factory will ever make." I hereby nominate "Michael Cranston attorney"/Miguel to become Bolo Bullis Foam Duck #27. Seconds, anyone? The nomination is ridiculous. It's interesting how say that this *nomination* is ridiculous - not Cranston's threat. How can you know whether the threat is ridiculous without knowing what predicated it? Irrelevant. The actions of one net.kook never make it okay for another to make (utterly stupid) life-threatening statements on Usenet. Life-threatening? Any type of a beating that requires hospitalisation is potentially life-threatening. -- Official FAQ for Alt.Usenet.Kooks: http://www.caballista.org/auk COOSN-266-06-58907 Hammer of Thor - August 2005 Pierre Salinger Memorial "Hook, Line & Sinker" awards - March 2005, July 2005, August 2005, August 2006, February 2007 [Co]Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler |
|
#5
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.sailing.asa,soc.singles,soc.men
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in : "Sean Monaghan" wrote in message miguel wrote in : Sean Monaghan wrote: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in : "Sean Monaghan" wrote in message miguel wrote in : Kali wrote: miguel said: Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote: Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking usenet to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to accomplish. Good job there kOOk. miguel So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney? If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence. This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar. This snippet of evidence not only justifies the open KotM nomination of Michael Cranston attorney, but it also qualifies him for the Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - AUK's highest lifetime-achievement award for stupidity. From - http://www.caballista.org/auk/awards.html "Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - The spoonerism for "dumb ****", for those who've lost more marbles than a Chinese Checker factory will ever make." I hereby nominate "Michael Cranston attorney"/Miguel to become Bolo Bullis Foam Duck #27. Seconds, anyone? The nomination is ridiculous. It's interesting how say that this *nomination* is ridiculous - not Cranston's threat. How can you know whether the threat is ridiculous without knowing what predicated it? Irrelevant. The actions of one net.kook never make it okay for another to make (utterly stupid) life-threatening statements on Usenet. Life-threatening? Any type of a beating that requires hospitalisation is potentially life-threatening. Beating? Okay, I'm not going to keep this up. You tried to bat me around in the other part of the thread about making assumptions, but you've made an incredible leap--"Evel does the Snake River Canyon" comes to mind--that I can't even keep my eye on your rocket. You can--and will, I'm sure--continue with the hyperbole. I've voiced my objections, and I find it contemptible. But there's not a lot to be gained beating my head against the wall over childish bullying either. -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay |
|
#6
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.sailing.asa,soc.singles,soc.men
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 16, 5:42 pm, Sean Monaghan wrote:
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote : Life-threatening? Any type of a beating that requires hospitalisation is potentially life-threatening. Human beings are terribly fragile. You can avoid inflicting death fairly reliably by concentrating on the extremities: knees, feet, fingers, arms and legs. If Mike has been practicing martial arts for all this time it is likely that he is able to inflict a beating upon an unarmed opponent without killing him or endangering his life. Of course, this would be bad practice. It is quite likely that if such a confrontation escalated into fatal violence it would be because of the introduction of a weapon by the alleged victim, Mr. Chaney who has made no secret of his love of guns. Crash Street Kidd |
|
#7
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.sailing.asa,soc.singles,soc.men
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sean Monaghan wrote:
miguel wrote: Sean Monaghan wrote: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote: "Sean Monaghan" wrote: Seconds, anyone? The nomination is ridiculous. It's interesting how say that this *nomination* is ridiculous - not Cranston's threat. How can you know whether the threat is ridiculous without knowing what predicated it? Irrelevant. The actions of one net.kook never make it okay for another to make (utterly stupid) life-threatening statements on Usenet. That rule is utterly stupid. First, it's mainly a shield for coward phony****s. Second, I'm probably as aware as anybody about the nature of any legal jeopardy arising from such a statement, and can measure the risk for myself. If you have some other justification for your absolute standard, it'd be interesting to hear. miguel |