|
Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:07:50 -0600, Art Deco sat in thee Comfee Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea: miguel wrote: In th Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco "To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert |
Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
|
Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Kali wrote in news:etjp9p$64h$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com: In , Art Deco said: : Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote: : On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:07:50 -0600, Art Deco sat in thee Comfee Chaire, : and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea: : miguel wrote: : : In th : : Shuttup, Cranston. : Shuttup, Cranston. : Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. |
Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
Kali wrote in news:etjp9p$64h$1 : In , Art Deco said: : Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote: : On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:07:50 -0600, Art Deco sat in thee Comfee Chaire, : and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea: : miguel wrote: : : In th : : Shuttup, Cranston. : Shuttup, Cranston. : Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco "To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert |
Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Art Deco wrote in
: Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote: Kali wrote in news:etjp9p$64h$1 : In , Art Deco said: : Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition : wrote: : On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:07:50 -0600, Art Deco sat in thee Comfee : Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea: : miguel wrote: : : In th : : Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, : Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. Are these responses a demonstration of the alledged "gift" kookologists claim to possess? |
*Ping* Trippy - Bobo Pool submission { PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}}
In article , Sean Monaghan took
the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh Wow"... miguel wrote in : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology, wrote: miguel said: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote: miguel said: Dumbarse Git wrote: miguel: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you admit to in another thread), You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my occupation. I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key. yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said award. If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping yourself. Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice. The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your behalf? It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry, I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests. Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/ Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making entertainment out of a bully. And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your defense of him and wish you'd stop. I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me. Perhaps soon you may miss those days too. You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you decided to join in. So solly. Threat noted. I hope so. If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are, frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy to pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois hold the keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology. Wow. Extortion attempt. Yo, Moonbeam - we[TINW] have a new submission for the Bobo pool. Pleace to consider this frothing maniac for odds. Thanks in advance. http://www.alcatroll.com/sean/miguel Noted. Research will commence shortly. -- trippy mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30 sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM NP: "I Ain't Drunk, I'm Just Drinkin'" -- Wrathchild America "Now, technology's getting better all the time and that's fine, but most of the time all you need is a stick of gum, a pocketknife, and a smile." -- Robert Redford "Spy Game" |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
On 16 Mar 2007 19:46:51 GMT, Sean Monaghan wrote:
miguel wrote in : Kali wrote: miguel said: : Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote: : Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking usenet : to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to : accomplish. : Good job there kOOk. : miguel So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney? If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^ This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence. This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar. This snippet of evidence not only justifies the open KotM nomination of Michael Cranston attorney, but it also qualifies him for the Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - AUK's highest lifetime-achievement award for stupidity. From - http://www.caballista.org/auk/awards.html "Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - The spoonerism for "dumb ****", for those who've lost more marbles than a Chinese Checker factory will ever make." I hereby nominate "Michael Cranston attorney"/Miguel to become Bolo Bullis Foam Duck #27. Seconds, anyone? Note - To those who will want to make the k'laim that this nomination is based on 'revenge' due to some coincidental flamewar in which I've never participated, let it be known that there have been many flamewars in which individual AUKers have participated where not a single nomination was ever made. Such k'laims are ludicrous, unfounded, and based on ignorance (and quite possibly, based on cluelessness) as opposed to being based on rational thought. Let's see if you have a sufficient number of neurons firing today to comprehend a fairly simple argument. First (not firstly, that's semi-literate), you kookologists universally disdain taking usenet to real life. "Real life" is fairly understood to mean consequences in meatspace. I think that standard of behavior is stupid and cowardly. I think if somebody types some nasty **** safely from under his bed in momma's basement he ought to possess enough character or courage to say it to somebody's face. If said nasty **** has real world consequences, even moreso. Perhaps there is one or two of you kookologists who possess the character and courage to abide that standard. I think I've read about one of you who does MMA training at one point or another. The rest of you hide behind your self-serving rule of conduct that serves only to insulate you from any consequences for your bad behavior. Second, since you kookologists hold universal disdain for taking usenet to real life, one might expect you to refrain from doing so, and that when one of your number elects out of desperation to do so, others of you might be intellectually honest enough to point out the hypocrisy. I expect I'll be waiting a long time to see any display of that. It's the same sort of hypocrisy I pointed out to you about your netkopping post. Are you too emotionally overwrought to be objective about this? miguel I second it. Cranston is a waste of space. LV "I rode a tank and held a general's rank When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank." ---Sympathy for the Devil-The Rolling Stones -------------------------------------------- "A fanatic cannot change his mind and will not change the subject." ---Winston Churchill ---------------------------------------------- "I can lose weight but you will always be ugly." ---Winston Churchill to Lady Astor |
Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 10:58:51 -0600, Art Deco attempted to confuse the
issue further by squeaking: Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote: Kali wrote: Art Deco said: :Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote: :On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:07:50 -0600, Art Deco sat in thee Comfee :Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea: :miguel wrote: : :In th : :Shuttup, Cranston. :Shuttup, Cranston. :Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. -- __________________________________________________ ______________________ Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069 The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pig****er In The Universe Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change. Remove all the confusion and k00ks from my posting addy to send me your sekrit messages. Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/ AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007 Message-ID: 1 "You are the GOD-DAMNED, IGNORANT LIAR here. Now, that is not me taking the Lord's name in vain." -- John Wentzky: Living proof of the Death of Irony, in Message-ID: I mourned: The Mop Jockey did most oddly state: DUDE, YOU WIN TEH INTERNETS!!! the oversized check is in the mail. Alas, all I get for my trouble is a Monkey that's trained to hurl **** under several of my nyms. "DevMcKinHole, you also get the pleasure of sucking off my doggy and cleaning out his butthole with your tongue." -- He's not so much a *Porch*Monkey as a _Fire_Monkey, as in one who's on fire due to his own tendency to mess with lighter fluid while standing beside a hot stove. Message-ID: 77Uxh.1996$384.1135@trnddc05 Said I: You, Monkey-man, are quite possibly the only usenetter in existence who does not and cannot own Hatter. "[...] What's the matter fagboi, am I beating your as$ so badly that you're no seeking an alliance with the diaperboi?...YOu really don't know how dumb you are, do ya?" -- I guess I don't, Monkey. Message-ID: gHVIh.1760$Bi2.1639@trnddc01 "Ok, but I am not stalking Teh Mop Jockey, I seem to be building a relationship with him. Remember, I am a Christian so the secular rules do not apply to me. I strive to be amoral, which I think applies to this situation. Keep this in mind, please. Since I am currently mentally ill and since I can not nominate, that is what I am doing at this time." -- Olympiada: Teh amoral "Christian", in Message-ID: "You're like some kind of rabid attack-gerbil." -- Lionel Lauer to Joxer in MID: "I say you are out of your ****ing mind." -- Ying Guo, posting as "SameAsB4" , tells PorchMonkey4Life, posting as the same nick but a slightly different morph, the score, in MID: "in the holy spirit i know you would satisfy every single person in a room if you were the only person present." -- ~tanya, to Crazy Andy II, in MID: . com If you never read anything else in any of my sigs, read this: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/ http://borealin.livejournal.com/15104.html Or watch it he http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqxmPjB0WSs Then, if you manage to read/watch all that, try this: http://www.newamericancentury.org/Re...asDefenses.pdf And Molly Ivins had a few choice words to say about it, weeks befo http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906B.shtml Here's Chris Floyd: Fatal Vision: The Deeper Evil Behind the Detainee Bill: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/100206A.shtml "Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War? A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon. Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8 George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner on outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines: "Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it. You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way. You're so ****ing scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you. "Meanwhile you are the ugliest pig****er in the universe. You are the coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear. "What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole." -- in MID: . com "I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead" Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID: "When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined to describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of stoned hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as throwing money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then explaining to reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil Ochs summed it up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you off." So when journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows, at best it's careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization. Osama bin Laden wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie Hoffman merely wanted to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner, http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v |
PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:05:18 -0700, miguel attempted to confuse the issue
further by squeaking: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote: miguel said: Dumbarse Git wrote: miguel: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you admit to in another thread), You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my occupation. I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key. yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said award. If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping yourself. Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice. The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your behalf? It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry, I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests. Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/ It is mine, Michael J. "Dog****er" Cranston attorney k00k. Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making entertainment out of a bully. And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your defense of him and wish you'd stop. I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me. weeps for the poor widdle twoll and his broken playpen Perhaps soon you may miss those days too. You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you decided to join in. So solly. So it's business as usual for you, then. -- __________________________________________________ ______________________ Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069 The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pig****er In The Universe Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change. Remove all the confusion and k00ks from my posting addy to send me your sekrit messages. Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/ AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007 Message-ID: 1 "You are the GOD-DAMNED, IGNORANT LIAR here. Now, that is not me taking the Lord's name in vain." -- John Wentzky: Living proof of the Death of Irony, in Message-ID: I mourned: The Mop Jockey did most oddly state: DUDE, YOU WIN TEH INTERNETS!!! the oversized check is in the mail. Alas, all I get for my trouble is a Monkey that's trained to hurl **** under several of my nyms. "DevMcKinHole, you also get the pleasure of sucking off my doggy and cleaning out his butthole with your tongue." -- He's not so much a *Porch*Monkey as a _Fire_Monkey, as in one who's on fire due to his own tendency to mess with lighter fluid while standing beside a hot stove. Message-ID: 77Uxh.1996$384.1135@trnddc05 Said I: You, Monkey-man, are quite possibly the only usenetter in existence who does not and cannot own Hatter. "[...] What's the matter fagboi, am I beating your as$ so badly that you're no seeking an alliance with the diaperboi?...YOu really don't know how dumb you are, do ya?" -- I guess I don't, Monkey. Message-ID: gHVIh.1760$Bi2.1639@trnddc01 "Ok, but I am not stalking Teh Mop Jockey, I seem to be building a relationship with him. Remember, I am a Christian so the secular rules do not apply to me. I strive to be amoral, which I think applies to this situation. Keep this in mind, please. Since I am currently mentally ill and since I can not nominate, that is what I am doing at this time." -- Olympiada: Teh amoral "Christian", in Message-ID: "You're like some kind of rabid attack-gerbil." -- Lionel Lauer to Joxer in MID: "I say you are out of your ****ing mind." -- Ying Guo, posting as "SameAsB4" , tells PorchMonkey4Life, posting as the same nick but a slightly different morph, the score, in MID: "in the holy spirit i know you would satisfy every single person in a room if you were the only person present." -- ~tanya, to Crazy Andy II, in MID: . com If you never read anything else in any of my sigs, read this: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/ http://borealin.livejournal.com/15104.html Or watch it he http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqxmPjB0WSs Then, if you manage to read/watch all that, try this: http://www.newamericancentury.org/Re...asDefenses.pdf And Molly Ivins had a few choice words to say about it, weeks befo http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906B.shtml Here's Chris Floyd: Fatal Vision: The Deeper Evil Behind the Detainee Bill: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/100206A.shtml "Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War? A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon. Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8 George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner on outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines: "Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it. You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way. You're so ****ing scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you. "Meanwhile you are the ugliest pig****er in the universe. You are the coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear. "What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole." -- in MID: . com "I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead" Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID: "When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined to describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of stoned hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as throwing money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then explaining to reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil Ochs summed it up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you off." So when journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows, at best it's careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization. Osama bin Laden wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie Hoffman merely wanted to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner, http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 09:38:05 -0400, Rhonda Lea Kirk attempted to confuse
the issue further by squeaking: "The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity" wrote On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:04:36 -0700, miguel did the cha-cha, and screamed: You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken matters to RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of the extent to which his raging insanity has caused him to make unspeakably nasty claims about my children and my grandchild. BTW, all of that **** from Steve was foam, and you ought to have just totted up your Usenet Valhalla points. Instead, you went to K00k Valhalla along with Steve. His /auk/ Valhalla points, don't you mean? "Usenet Valhalla" points, aka "UV" points. Collectable all over usenet! auk is not the usenet police, right? And it doesn't set the standards for other groups, right? soc.singles seems to have an entirely different culture from auk, Snarky. Are you saying that auk's rules still apply? No, I'm saying his actions are his, and k00ky behaviour is k00ky -- I'm not blaming soc.singles for his assholery. AUK is an anarchy. No cops here. Further, I take note that Chaney carries Mike's name and address around in his sig. Is that just foam too? Yep. Chaney's a textbook k00k, Cranston's a minor k00k. I'm not inclined to try to untangle a decade and a half of history for a single newsgroup. I just don't have the time. But Chaney has given me a creepy feeling since the first time I read one of his posts, so I think I'll go with that when it comes to assessing who is right and who is wrong in this. Make no mistake, I think Stevie's k00ky as hell, but Mikey's not exactly all there, either. -- __________________________________________________ ______________________ Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069 The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pig****er In The Universe Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change. Remove all the confusion and k00ks from my posting addy to send me your sekrit messages. Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/ AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007 Message-ID: 1 "You are the GOD-DAMNED, IGNORANT LIAR here. Now, that is not me taking the Lord's name in vain." -- John Wentzky: Living proof of the Death of Irony, in Message-ID: I mourned: The Mop Jockey did most oddly state: DUDE, YOU WIN TEH INTERNETS!!! the oversized check is in the mail. Alas, all I get for my trouble is a Monkey that's trained to hurl **** under several of my nyms. "DevMcKinHole, you also get the pleasure of sucking off my doggy and cleaning out his butthole with your tongue." -- He's not so much a *Porch*Monkey as a _Fire_Monkey, as in one who's on fire due to his own tendency to mess with lighter fluid while standing beside a hot stove. Message-ID: 77Uxh.1996$384.1135@trnddc05 Said I: You, Monkey-man, are quite possibly the only usenetter in existence who does not and cannot own Hatter. "[...] What's the matter fagboi, am I beating your as$ so badly that you're no seeking an alliance with the diaperboi?...YOu really don't know how dumb you are, do ya?" -- I guess I don't, Monkey. Message-ID: gHVIh.1760$Bi2.1639@trnddc01 "Ok, but I am not stalking Teh Mop Jockey, I seem to be building a relationship with him. Remember, I am a Christian so the secular rules do not apply to me. I strive to be amoral, which I think applies to this situation. Keep this in mind, please. Since I am currently mentally ill and since I can not nominate, that is what I am doing at this time." -- Olympiada: Teh amoral "Christian", in Message-ID: "You're like some kind of rabid attack-gerbil." -- Lionel Lauer to Joxer in MID: "I say you are out of your ****ing mind." -- Ying Guo, posting as "SameAsB4" , tells PorchMonkey4Life, posting as the same nick but a slightly different morph, the score, in MID: "in the holy spirit i know you would satisfy every single person in a room if you were the only person present." -- ~tanya, to Crazy Andy II, in MID: . com If you never read anything else in any of my sigs, read this: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/ http://borealin.livejournal.com/15104.html Or watch it he http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqxmPjB0WSs Then, if you manage to read/watch all that, try this: http://www.newamericancentury.org/Re...asDefenses.pdf And Molly Ivins had a few choice words to say about it, weeks befo http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906B.shtml Here's Chris Floyd: Fatal Vision: The Deeper Evil Behind the Detainee Bill: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/100206A.shtml "Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War? A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon. Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8 George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner on outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines: "Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it. You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way. You're so ****ing scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you. "Meanwhile you are the ugliest pig****er in the universe. You are the coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear. "What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole." -- in MID: . com "I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead" Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID: "When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined to describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of stoned hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as throwing money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then explaining to reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil Ochs summed it up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you off." So when journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows, at best it's careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization. Osama bin Laden wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie Hoffman merely wanted to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner, http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v |
Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Demon Lord of Confusion
ballista.org wrote: On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 10:58:51 -0600, Art Deco attempted to confuse the issue further by squeaking: Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote: Kali wrote: Art Deco said: :Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote: :On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:07:50 -0600, Art Deco sat in thee Comfee :Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea: :miguel wrote: : :In th : :Shuttup, Cranston. :Shuttup, Cranston. :Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco "To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 {NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Respondant wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: snip It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe the trouble it caused me. What say you, Snarky? For what award should I nominate the responsible kook? Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow. :-) You really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I know you've said you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons I'm not aware of, and don't care to know) but to what end? What good can possibly come of it? Why is it in her best interests to drop it? PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area. Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one too, you stupid ****. miguel |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
miguel wrote:
Respondant wrote: Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: snip It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe the trouble it caused me. What say you, Snarky? For what award should I nominate the responsible kook? Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow. :-) You really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I know you've said you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons I'm not aware of, and don't care to know) but to what end? What good can possibly come of it? Why is it in her best interests to drop it? I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it. That's all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware, Rhonda is free to do what she damn well pleases. PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area. Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one too, you stupid ****. Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my face? Now THAT would be intersesting. Bill |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 {NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Respondant wrote:
miguel wrote: Respondant wrote: Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: snip It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe the trouble it caused me. What say you, Snarky? For what award should I nominate the responsible kook? Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow. :-) You really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I know you've said you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons I'm not aware of, and don't care to know) but to what end? What good can possibly come of it? Why is it in her best interests to drop it? I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it. That's all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware, Rhonda is free to do what she damn well pleases. If you have a suggestion for her, you must have some reason to believe it's in her best interests to follow your suggestion. You wouldn't just make some suggestion randomly, would you? C'mon. Let's hear why in your opinion it's best for her to drop it. PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area. Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one too, you stupid ****. Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my face? Now THAT would be intersesting. Well, let's hope I get a chance someday then. miguel |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
"Respondant" wrote in message
miguel wrote: Respondant wrote: Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: snip It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe the trouble it caused me. What say you, Snarky? For what award should I nominate the responsible kook? Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow. :-) You really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I know you've said you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons I'm not aware of, and don't care to know) but to what end? What good can possibly come of it? Why is it in her best interests to drop it? I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it. You said I /really should/, not that I might. That's all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware, Rhonda is free to do what she damn well pleases. See below. PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area. Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one too, you stupid ****. Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my face? And maybe you'll even call me a **** to my face? Now THAT would be intersesting. I think MY idea is more interesting. -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
miguel wrote:
Respondant wrote: miguel wrote: Respondant wrote: Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: snip It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe the trouble it caused me. What say you, Snarky? For what award should I nominate the responsible kook? Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow. :-) You really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I know you've said you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons I'm not aware of, and don't care to know) but to what end? What good can possibly come of it? Why is it in her best interests to drop it? I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it. That's all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware, Rhonda is free to do what she damn well pleases. If you have a suggestion for her, you must have some reason to believe it's in her best interests to follow your suggestion. You wouldn't just make some suggestion randomly, would you? I might. C'mon. Let's hear why in your opinion it's best for her to drop it. She's already stated that she hates being in the middle of a mess between people she likes. (That would include, you) So I don't think it's all that far-fetched for me to ask her to (re)consider bowing out (which she also hinted at a while ago) so as to *retain* her friendships with all concerned. PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area. Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one too, you stupid ****. Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my face? Now THAT would be intersesting. Well, let's hope I get a chance someday then. Let's both hope that. And let's hope if you say it to my face, you say it in "fun". K? Bill |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 {NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Respondant wrote:
miguel wrote: Respondant wrote: miguel wrote: Respondant wrote: Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: snip It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe the trouble it caused me. What say you, Snarky? For what award should I nominate the responsible kook? Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow. :-) You really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I know you've said you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons I'm not aware of, and don't care to know) but to what end? What good can possibly come of it? Why is it in her best interests to drop it? I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it. That's all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware, Rhonda is free to do what she damn well pleases. If you have a suggestion for her, you must have some reason to believe it's in her best interests to follow your suggestion. You wouldn't just make some suggestion randomly, would you? I might. C'mon. Let's hear why in your opinion it's best for her to drop it. She's already stated that she hates being in the middle of a mess between people she likes. (That would include, you) So I don't think it's all that far-fetched for me to ask her to (re)consider bowing out (which she also hinted at a while ago) so as to *retain* her friendships with all concerned. That's fair. Thanks. PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area. Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one too, you stupid ****. Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my face? Now THAT would be intersesting. Well, let's hope I get a chance someday then. Let's both hope that. And let's hope if you say it to my face, you say it in "fun". K? That probably won't happen, since you created that fangroup for me. miguel |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
"miguel" wrote in message
Respondant wrote: miguel wrote: Respondant wrote: miguel wrote: Respondant wrote: Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: snip It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe the trouble it caused me. What say you, Snarky? For what award should I nominate the responsible kook? Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow. :-) You really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I know you've said you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons I'm not aware of, and don't care to know) but to what end? What good can possibly come of it? Why is it in her best interests to drop it? I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it. That's all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware, Rhonda is free to do what she damn well pleases. If you have a suggestion for her, you must have some reason to believe it's in her best interests to follow your suggestion. You wouldn't just make some suggestion randomly, would you? I might. C'mon. Let's hear why in your opinion it's best for her to drop it. She's already stated that she hates being in the middle of a mess between people she likes. (That would include, you) So I don't think it's all that far-fetched for me to ask her to (re)consider bowing out (which she also hinted at a while ago) so as to *retain* her friendships with all concerned. That's fair. Thanks. PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area. Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one too, you stupid ****. Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my face? Now THAT would be intersesting. Well, let's hope I get a chance someday then. Let's both hope that. And let's hope if you say it to my face, you say it in "fun". K? That probably won't happen, since you created that fangroup for me. Different Bill, I think. -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
"Respondant" wrote in message miguel wrote: Respondant wrote: Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: snip It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe the trouble it caused me. What say you, Snarky? For what award should I nominate the responsible kook? Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow. :-) You really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I know you've said you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons I'm not aware of, and don't care to know) but to what end? What good can possibly come of it? Why is it in her best interests to drop it? I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it. You said I /really should/, not that I might. I sit corrected. My bad. That's all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware, Rhonda is free to do what she damn well pleases. See below. PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area. Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one too, you stupid ****. Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my face? And maybe you'll even call me a **** to my face? I'd have to know you a really LONG time, (or DESPISE you) before I'd use that particular word if you were even within earshot. I have more respect for woman than to say something like that. I get the feeling you remember me from a while ago since you brought up the "****" thing. And I know it ****ed you off, and I apologized for it, but you would have none of it. I've been married nearly 25 years Rhonda, to the love of my life. And yes, she absolutely abhors that word ... But sometimes it's fun to just poke her with it for reactions sake. That's all. Now THAT would be intersesting. I think MY idea is more interesting. Would you *like* me to call both you and my wife "****s" over a beer? I'm pretty sure as long as the wife knows it's coming ahead of time, I can get away with it. :-) Sheesh. |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
"miguel" wrote in message Respondant wrote: miguel wrote: Respondant wrote: miguel wrote: Respondant wrote: Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: snip It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe the trouble it caused me. What say you, Snarky? For what award should I nominate the responsible kook? Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow. :-) You really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I know you've said you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons I'm not aware of, and don't care to know) but to what end? What good can possibly come of it? Why is it in her best interests to drop it? I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it. That's all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware, Rhonda is free to do what she damn well pleases. If you have a suggestion for her, you must have some reason to believe it's in her best interests to follow your suggestion. You wouldn't just make some suggestion randomly, would you? I might. C'mon. Let's hear why in your opinion it's best for her to drop it. She's already stated that she hates being in the middle of a mess between people she likes. (That would include, you) So I don't think it's all that far-fetched for me to ask her to (re)consider bowing out (which she also hinted at a while ago) so as to *retain* her friendships with all concerned. That's fair. Thanks. PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area. Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one too, you stupid ****. Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my face? Now THAT would be intersesting. Well, let's hope I get a chance someday then. Let's both hope that. And let's hope if you say it to my face, you say it in "fun". K? That probably won't happen, since you created that fangroup for me. Different Bill, I think. You'd be correct. |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 {NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
"miguel" wrote in message Respondant wrote: miguel wrote: Respondant wrote: miguel wrote: Respondant wrote: Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: snip It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe the trouble it caused me. What say you, Snarky? For what award should I nominate the responsible kook? Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow. :-) You really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I know you've said you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons I'm not aware of, and don't care to know) but to what end? What good can possibly come of it? Why is it in her best interests to drop it? I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it. That's all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware, Rhonda is free to do what she damn well pleases. If you have a suggestion for her, you must have some reason to believe it's in her best interests to follow your suggestion. You wouldn't just make some suggestion randomly, would you? I might. C'mon. Let's hear why in your opinion it's best for her to drop it. She's already stated that she hates being in the middle of a mess between people she likes. (That would include, you) So I don't think it's all that far-fetched for me to ask her to (re)consider bowing out (which she also hinted at a while ago) so as to *retain* her friendships with all concerned. That's fair. Thanks. PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area. Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one too, you stupid ****. Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my face? Now THAT would be intersesting. Well, let's hope I get a chance someday then. Let's both hope that. And let's hope if you say it to my face, you say it in "fun". K? That probably won't happen, since you created that fangroup for me. Different Bill, I think. Okay, I apologize, Bill. |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
"Respondant" wrote in message
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: "Respondant" wrote in message miguel wrote: Respondant wrote: Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: snip It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe the trouble it caused me. What say you, Snarky? For what award should I nominate the responsible kook? Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow. :-) You really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I know you've said you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons I'm not aware of, and don't care to know) but to what end? What good can possibly come of it? Why is it in her best interests to drop it? I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it. You said I /really should/, not that I might. I sit corrected. My bad. That's all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware, Rhonda is free to do what she damn well pleases. See below. PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area. Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one too, you stupid ****. Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my face? And maybe you'll even call me a **** to my face? I'd have to know you a really LONG time, (or DESPISE you) before I'd use that particular word if you were even within earshot. I have more respect for woman than to say something like that. I get the feeling you remember me from a while ago since you brought up the "****" thing. And I know it ****ed you off, and I apologized for it, I gave you three chances to apologize and you didn't. That was why it became a problem. You got a lot of slack from me, including that "foot on Rhonda's chest for victolly" bs, if you recall, but when I drew the line, you tried to dance over it. but you would have none of it. When I have a chance...sometime after this is all over...I'll retrieve the message IDs for you, and then we'll discuss your faulty memory. I've been married nearly 25 years Rhonda, to the love of my life. And yes, she absolutely abhors that word ... But sometimes it's fun to just poke her with it for reactions sake. That's all. We had this discussion too, which is why your behavior was so inexplicable. Now THAT would be intersesting. I think MY idea is more interesting. Would you *like* me to call both you and my wife "****s" over a beer? I'm pretty sure as long as the wife knows it's coming ahead of time, I can get away with it. :-) Sheesh. My sentiments exactly. -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 {NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Respondant wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: "miguel" wrote in message Respondant wrote: miguel wrote: Respondant wrote: miguel wrote: Respondant wrote: Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: snip It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe the trouble it caused me. What say you, Snarky? For what award should I nominate the responsible kook? Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow. :-) You really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I know you've said you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons I'm not aware of, and don't care to know) but to what end? What good can possibly come of it? Why is it in her best interests to drop it? I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it. That's all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware, Rhonda is free to do what she damn well pleases. If you have a suggestion for her, you must have some reason to believe it's in her best interests to follow your suggestion. You wouldn't just make some suggestion randomly, would you? I might. C'mon. Let's hear why in your opinion it's best for her to drop it. She's already stated that she hates being in the middle of a mess between people she likes. (That would include, you) So I don't think it's all that far-fetched for me to ask her to (re)consider bowing out (which she also hinted at a while ago) so as to *retain* her friendships with all concerned. That's fair. Thanks. PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area. Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one too, you stupid ****. Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my face? Now THAT would be intersesting. Well, let's hope I get a chance someday then. Let's both hope that. And let's hope if you say it to my face, you say it in "fun". K? That probably won't happen, since you created that fangroup for me. Different Bill, I think. You'd be correct. I apologize, sir. |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
miguel wrote:
Respondant wrote: Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: "miguel" wrote in message Respondant wrote: miguel wrote: Respondant wrote: miguel wrote: Respondant wrote: Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: snip It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe the trouble it caused me. What say you, Snarky? For what award should I nominate the responsible kook? Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow. :-) You really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I know you've said you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons I'm not aware of, and don't care to know) but to what end? What good can possibly come of it? Why is it in her best interests to drop it? I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it. That's all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware, Rhonda is free to do what she damn well pleases. If you have a suggestion for her, you must have some reason to believe it's in her best interests to follow your suggestion. You wouldn't just make some suggestion randomly, would you? I might. C'mon. Let's hear why in your opinion it's best for her to drop it. She's already stated that she hates being in the middle of a mess between people she likes. (That would include, you) So I don't think it's all that far-fetched for me to ask her to (re)consider bowing out (which she also hinted at a while ago) so as to *retain* her friendships with all concerned. That's fair. Thanks. PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area. Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one too, you stupid ****. Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my face? Now THAT would be intersesting. Well, let's hope I get a chance someday then. Let's both hope that. And let's hope if you say it to my face, you say it in "fun". K? That probably won't happen, since you created that fangroup for me. Different Bill, I think. You'd be correct. I apologize, sir. Accepted. No big deal. Like I told Rhonda, I'm gone. But I *do* hope y'all get this worked out. |
Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
|
*Ping* Trippy - Bobo Pool submission { PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}}
trippy wrote in
: In article , Sean Monaghan took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh Wow"... miguel wrote in : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology, wrote: miguel said: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote: miguel said: Dumbarse Git wrote: miguel: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you admit to in another thread), You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my occupation. I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key. yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said award. If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping yourself. Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice. The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your behalf? It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry, I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests. Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/ Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making entertainment out of a bully. And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your defense of him and wish you'd stop. I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me. Perhaps soon you may miss those days too. You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you decided to join in. So solly. Threat noted. I hope so. If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are, frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy to pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois hold the keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology. Wow. Extortion attempt. Yo, Moonbeam - we[TINW] have a new submission for the Bobo pool. Pleace to consider this frothing maniac for odds. Thanks in advance. http://www.alcatroll.com/sean/miguel Noted. Research will commence shortly. Thank you, sir. :-) -- Official FAQ for Alt.Usenet.Kooks: http://www.caballista.org/auk COOSN-266-06-58907 Hammer of Thor - August 2005 Pierre Salinger Memorial "Hook, Line & Sinker" awards - March 2005, July 2005, August 2005, August 2006, February 2007 [Co]Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler |
Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Kali wrote:
In , Art Deco said: : Demon Lord of Confusion : ballista.org wrote: : On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 10:58:51 -0600, Art Deco attempted to confuse the : issue further by squeaking: : Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote: : Kali wrote: : Art Deco said: : :Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote: : :On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:07:50 -0600, Art Deco sat in thee Comfee : :Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea: : :miguel wrote: : : : :In th : : : :Shuttup, Cranston. : :Shuttup, Cranston. : :Shuttup, Cranston. : Shuttup, Cranston. : Shuttup, Cranston. : Shuttup, Cranston. : Shuttup, Cranston. : Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco "To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert |
Nomination of Michael "Miguel Cranston for Clueless Newbie ofthe Month
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
"Steve Leyland" Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: "Butt**** Bill" It's really that simple, and that's really your only realistic option if you intend to affect the outcome. Complaining about nominations does very little more than amuse kookologists. It's all fun and games until someone loses an eye. can somewon pleace poast a lits of which wons are teh kooks and which are teh kookologists? TIA. Depends on who you ask, Steve. I've volunteered to be the kook several times now. The only thing I don't like is that the same tools in the hands of the kookologists are legitimate "weapons" but in the hands of the kooks, they are kooky. I have a systemizing-type mind, and it makes my brain buzz when I try to reconcile such reasoning. Anyway, if you figure out who is who, you're probably safest if you keep it to yourself. No, man. We need more lits. -- Democrats use bookmarks. Republicans just bend over a page. |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 {NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message Your feelings got hurt over Usenet posts. Grow a thicker skin, drama queen. It doesn't matter how /you/ characterize it, and it doesn't matter if you resort to ad homming me, because the damage Snarky did had nothing to do with /my/ feelings. Sean is stupid. |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
"miguel" wrote in message
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: "Sean Monaghan" wrote in message Your feelings got hurt over Usenet posts. Grow a thicker skin, drama queen. It doesn't matter how /you/ characterize it, and it doesn't matter if you resort to ad homming me, because the damage Snarky did had nothing to do with /my/ feelings. Sean is stupid. Considering he seems to think he can provoke me into a meltdown by bullying me with bull****, I'd have to agree. -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay |
John Fereira justifies Steve Chaney, Aaron Kulkis, and everyone else, to defend Mike Cranston
On Mar 21, 2:41 am, (Steve Chaney,
still taunting the happy fun ball) wrote: In , John Fereira wrote: The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity wrote in : On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:04:36 -0700, miguel did the cha-cha, and screamed: Sean Monaghan wrote: miguel wrote: Kali wrote: miguel said: : Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote: Translation: even though : all kookologists agree that taking usenet to real life is prime : kooksign, that's what I'm trying to accomplish. : Good job there kOOk. miguel So, what are your plans for Steve : Cheney? If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence. This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar. Sean, Kali recently stated that she was considered the most reasonable and judicious of the kookologists. If by that she is contrasting herself with you, K-Bitch and ****stain, you can imagine the difficulty I or anybody else might have in giving her any points for that claim. You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken matters to RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of the extent to which his raging insanity has caused him to make unspeakably nasty claims about my children and my grandchild. Who cares? This is usenet. Did you read the first sentence? When matters are taken into real life, why is it so unreasonable to respond in real life? Miguel has merely written on usenet what he would like to do in real life in response to what someone has done to him in real life. This whole "it's only words on a screen" is hogwash because it neglects any context. It's not such a black and white issue. An appropriate response depends on what those words are, and whose screen on which they appear. For example, what if those words happen to contain numbers as well, such as a SSN and credit card information, and those words appear on the screen of identity thieves? Have a read on this identify theft victims story and then tell me that Miguel or any other kook on your list deserves a similar fate? What if the "words on a screen" are a complete fabrication and appear the the screen of your employer, or if you're self employeed, potential customers. Your "logic" applies equally to: a) Aaron Kulkis' death threats at Ondrea and Jeanette for talking about posting his SSNs b) real lifing in general over every possible perceived defamation. Oh I know. It's "different" when it isn't your butt buddy Mike. Aaron Kulkis was Jeanette's obsession and not Ondrea's. It is cute how you are trying to lay Jeanette's actions on Ondrea's doorstep. Words on a screen can have real life impact, and to categorically label someone as a kook because he/she writes on usenet what he would like to do in real life, is absurd. IMHO, the fact that Miguel has been busting the balls and trolling kookologist with great succes is the only reason that he's been nominated for one of your infantile awards. Infantile awards. Hmmm. You used to put great credibility in those "awards" when they were being used against those you didn't like. And so the last surviving sniggler house of cards comes a'tumbling down... That is what a house of cards does. Your point? A decade or more is a long time to hold a grudge. Crash Street Kidd -- Steve -- |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 {NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
"TheBookman" wrote Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: "TheBookman" wrote Bottom line, I wish you well, and hope you manage to repair the damage to your life. shrug I appreciate this, but the damage Snarky did can't be fixed, even if everything else is. If you believe that it cannot be fixed, it cannot be fixed. All that is left for you is to go forward with your life. Best of luck doing so, and if there is anything that I cn do to help, you know where to find me. ESL! You've always been one of the good guys. :) For the record, I am considering releasing Bookman from his promise to Remove Himself from Usenet Altogether. |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
"miguel" wrote in message
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: "TheBookman" wrote Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: "TheBookman" wrote Bottom line, I wish you well, and hope you manage to repair the damage to your life. shrug I appreciate this, but the damage Snarky did can't be fixed, even if everything else is. If you believe that it cannot be fixed, it cannot be fixed. All that is left for you is to go forward with your life. Best of luck doing so, and if there is anything that I cn do to help, you know where to find me. ESL! You've always been one of the good guys. :) For the record, I am considering releasing Bookman from his promise to Remove Himself from Usenet Altogether. Snarky is definitely planning our wedding now. -- Trilby O'Ferrall Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
"miguel" wrote in message Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: "TheBookman" wrote Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: "TheBookman" wrote Bottom line, I wish you well, and hope you manage to repair the damage to your life. shrug I appreciate this, but the damage Snarky did can't be fixed, even if everything else is. If you believe that it cannot be fixed, it cannot be fixed. All that is left for you is to go forward with your life. Best of luck doing so, and if there is anything that I cn do to help, you know where to find me. ESL! You've always been one of the good guys. :) For the record, I am considering releasing Bookman from his promise to Remove Himself from Usenet Altogether. Snarky is definitely planning our wedding now. You both are just a pair of drama queens. -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco "To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 {NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Art Deco wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: "miguel" wrote in message Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: "TheBookman" wrote Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: "TheBookman" wrote Bottom line, I wish you well, and hope you manage to repair the damage to your life. shrug I appreciate this, but the damage Snarky did can't be fixed, even if everything else is. If you believe that it cannot be fixed, it cannot be fixed. All that is left for you is to go forward with your life. Best of luck doing so, and if there is anything that I cn do to help, you know where to find me. ESL! You've always been one of the good guys. :) For the record, I am considering releasing Bookman from his promise to Remove Himself from Usenet Altogether. Snarky is definitely planning our wedding now. You both are just a pair of drama queens. I think Rhonda Lea is entitled not to be paired up with Snarky anymore. miguel |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Art Deco Thou arrant coward. If thou dost marry,
I'll give thee this plague for thy dowry, be thou as chaste as ice, as pure as snow, thou shall not escape calummy. Thou lean-witted crafty swearing rascal. Thou monotonic knot-pated. Ye expanded and ye prated: Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: "miguel" wrote in message Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: "TheBookman" wrote Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: "TheBookman" wrote Bottom line, I wish you well, and hope you manage to repair the damage to your life. shrug I appreciate this, but the damage Snarky did can't be fixed, even if everything else is. If you believe that it cannot be fixed, it cannot be fixed. All that is left for you is to go forward with your life. Best of luck doing so, and if there is anything that I cn do to help, you know where to find me. ESL! You've always been one of the good guys. :) For the record, I am considering releasing Bookman from his promise to Remove Himself from Usenet Altogether. Snarky is definitely planning our wedding now. You both are just a pair of drama queens. No. Rhonda's comment is an obvious and logical outcome of something that Snarky wrote. I'm in no position to point the finger of accusation about uncaring, unsympathetic and unthinking self-served justifications for my own behaviour wrt to Rhonda so I won't point that same finger at Snarky. -- alt.usenet.kooks "We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us." Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129] Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007. Vescere puter subgalia meis. "Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up." AOK in |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27
In article ,
miguel wrote: Sean Monaghan wrote: miguel wrote in : Kali wrote: miguel said: : Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote: : Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking usenet : to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to : accomplish. : Good job there kOOk. : miguel So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney? If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence. This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar. Sean, Kali recently stated that she was considered the most reasonable and judicious of the kookologists. If by that she is contrasting herself with you, K-Bitch and ****stain, you can imagine the difficulty I or anybody else might have in giving her any points for that claim. You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken matters to RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of the extent to which his raging insanity has caused him to make unspeakably nasty claims about my children and my grandchild. Charlotte, on the other hand, does. Yep. (But did he ever go after your son? Steve tends to go after girls, especially minor girls, and babies, not fit adult males ;).) If you have any questions about whether Chaney deserves to have his ass kicked, feel free to direct them to her. I can't support the "put him in the hospital", even though you, I, and everyone reading here, including Wonderbra himself, knows that it will never happen, because Steve tucks his tail and runs for his Fort Machismo bunker when he gets called on his ****. Has for decades. For kookologists, Seattle is Steebe's Front Street Gym, his P. F. Chang's. Steve chickened out repeatedly on me offering to stand him a snack at La Bou (local wonderful Viet-French bakery) when I was in town, and I'm Ms. Mild-Mannered Sysadmin Church Lady and was within a local phone call at the time. And unlike Mike (who is a strong man in physically excellent shape), it would be fairly tricky for me to do him physical harm, even were I not in a fully public location and a Nice Lady (tm) to boot. Steve's met me, and he knows that. Definitely "Delicious Crab Wontons". (If you're ever in Sac'to, it's all good at La Bou; I'm especially fond of the ham and cheese croissants.) Remember that this is the same Steve Chaney who just stalked a usenet opponent's uninvolved-in-the-argument minor daughter over Myspace, filed a police report IRL, and published the opponent's uninvolved-in-the-argument ex-spouse's name and place of employment. Who has been bringing off-usenet Real Life stuff in years after the relevant parties have made up with each other. This stuff has happened before, folks, and has happened repeatedly over the years that I've known him. And who has done a lot of crap in the "taking it to real life" or "threatening to take it to real life" - posting addresses (Mike's included - and, yes, it happened first and had RL consequences), trying to get police/authorities involved (remember his ludicrous claims that I'm an embezzler?), trying to screw with peoples' livelihoods, claiming to drive by his opponents' (note the plural) houses, online and offline (that's Real Life) harassment of opponents' (note the plural again) children and grandchildren. Making things up out of thin air. Hiring PIs and search firms to get information on people who are living their own lives without him. Having meltdowns when his behaviour is pointed out to him. Think Chuckles, folks. Although I don't know if Chuckles ever claimed to poison a dog. That's our Steebie. I don't spot him particular "UPA" (note scare quotes) points for getting Migs and Jeem and a few other people riled up by the foul things he pulled with their kids. I think that most (sane) parents would be as fierce, although they might express themselves in different ways. I've seen Mike and Jeem with their kids, and they're great dads. I survived some major deep **** that happened to me when I was around the age of those girls because *my* dad, who I still adore wildly, had my back. So I've been on the "other side" of that kind of bond. It kept me alive so I'm inclined to cut slack ;). In other words, it's probably not how I would have handled it, but I can see where it's coming from. Steve knows that Mike can give it up. He told me so, live, in person. Mike's given it up (for times). But Steve likes the attention. Steve will escalate in increasingly kooky and pathetic ways if he's not getting enough attention, as all kookologists, both old timer and recent, should be perfectly well aware of by now. Charlotte -- |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com