|
*Ping* Trippy - Bobo Pool submission { PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}}
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" post-humping my nominations
again, wrote in : "Sean Monaghan" wrote in message miguel wrote in : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology, wrote: miguel said: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote: miguel said: Dumbarse Git wrote: miguel: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you admit to in another thread), You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my occupation. I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key. yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said award. If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping yourself. Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice. The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your behalf? It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry, I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests. Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/ Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making entertainment out of a bully. And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your defense of him and wish you'd stop. I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me. Perhaps soon you may miss those days too. You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you decided to join in. So solly. Threat noted. I hope so. If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are, frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy to pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois hold the keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology. Wow. Extortion attempt. No. It's negotiation: Everyone stops. The problem is, you give every indication of holding the belief that you should be able to continue what you started and that Mike has no right to attempt to mitigate his damages. Equity is for everyone, Sean. Are you *really* this thick?!?!? Why, pray tell, would the fact that I made an informative Kook-FAQ about the ****wit make it acceptable (to you) for him to post a link to *Kali's* alleged workplace? Hello - Kali and I are not the same person. Yo, Moonbeam - we[TINW] have a new submission for the Bobo pool. Pleace to consider this frothing maniac for odds. Thanks in advance. http://www.alcatroll.com/sean/miguel -- Official FAQ for Alt.Usenet.Kooks: http://www.caballista.org/auk COOSN-266-06-58907 Hammer of Thor - August 2005 Pierre Salinger Memorial "Hook, Line & Sinker" awards - March 2005, July 2005, August 2005, August 2006, February 2007 [Co]Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler |
PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
K. A. Cannon wrote in
: On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:38:17 +0000 (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote: Kali wrote in m: In , miguel mjc101 @gmail.com said: : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department : of Psychology : (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote: : miguel said: : Dumbarse Git wrote: : miguel: : : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: : : You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which : you admit to in another thread), : : You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my : occupation. : : I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse : Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth : and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key. : : yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the : (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. : : I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments : ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody : please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? : I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about : the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense : to said award. : : If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, : Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and : occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she : has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their : posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she : needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the : google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about : stopping yourself. : : Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. : : You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, : what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you : all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your : choice. : : The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour : to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise : on your behalf? : : It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. : : Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and : let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his : unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry, : I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past : pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had : realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their : kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests. : : Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University : of Wisconsin-Parkside, : http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/ : : Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or : voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making : entertainment out of a bully. : : And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does : affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you : hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your : defense of him and wish you'd stop. : : I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with : people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having : asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain : get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a : way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me. : : Perhaps soon you may miss those days too. : : You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you : decided to join in. So solly. : : miguel Threat noted. Maybe Cranston would like to threaten me next? I'm only working about two miles from the little dweeb. Ahem...it is a Usenet tradition that I be threatened first. Yeah? You forgot to tell Foamboi. Maybe he can make his threats to me personally too!! Tell the nutless ****wit you're female. It brings out the bestest k00ky threats in mikey. Scare me, mikey! add me to ur lits mikey!! Day-yum, I hace been teh litsiest! Thanks for reminding moi! |
*Ping* Trippy - Bobo Pool submission { PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}}
"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" post-humping my nominations again, wrote in : "Sean Monaghan" wrote in message miguel wrote in : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology, wrote: miguel said: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote: miguel said: Dumbarse Git wrote: miguel: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you admit to in another thread), You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my occupation. I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key. yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said award. If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping yourself. Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice. The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your behalf? It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry, I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests. Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/ Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making entertainment out of a bully. And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your defense of him and wish you'd stop. I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me. Perhaps soon you may miss those days too. You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you decided to join in. So solly. Threat noted. I hope so. If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are, frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy to pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois hold the keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology. Wow. Extortion attempt. No. It's negotiation: Everyone stops. The problem is, you give every indication of holding the belief that you should be able to continue what you started and that Mike has no right to attempt to mitigate his damages. Equity is for everyone, Sean. Are you *really* this thick?!?!? Would that be another one of those abusive ad homs? Why, pray tell, would the fact that I made an informative Kook-FAQ about the ****wit make it acceptable (to you) for him to post a link to *Kali's* alleged workplace? Bzzzt. http://www.fallacyfiles.org/index.html Go find it yourself. I've got better things to do than to play "name the fallacy." My NPD ex-husband used to try to tie me up in knots with faulty logic. I thought I loved him, so it never occurred to me to cut him off at the knees. I don't even think I love you. Hello - Kali and I are not the same person. laughing It would be pretty ****ing funny if you were. Yo, Moonbeam - we[TINW] have a new submission for the Bobo pool. Pleace to consider this frothing maniac for odds. Thanks in advance. http://www.alcatroll.com/sean/miguel -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in : "Kali" wrote in message In , Rhonda Lea Kirk said: "Kali" wrote in message In , miguel mjc101 @gmail.com said: Dumbarse Git wrote: miguel: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you admit to in another thread), yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said award. If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping yourself. Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice. The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your behalf? It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. miguel I didn't mention your full name or your occupation (let alone your work location), you filthy kook. You have serious reading comprehension problems. I've explained my position on this very well, and I maintain that position. I merely cited an example to make a point. You, being the kooky bully you are, saw a threat in it and decided you were going to do the same thing, only turn it up a notch. That's what narcissistic kooks do. The more you write, the kookier you seem. You're so bent on your kooky mission that you're willing to drag Rhonda through hell for it. Say what you want, and have Rhonda try to defend you, but kooky is as kooky does. This post is just another example. He's not responsible for my choices. His transparent manipulation of you aside... He was a friend to me when I was being batted around like a cat toy, and auk was giving out an undeserved Salinger for a troll that did me a lot of emotional damage. Are you familiar with the history of how the Salinger HL&S got its name? Would you imagine that some people's feelings were hurt when they heard about the 'crash'? I think so. That's the nature of the award. Sean, I addressed this specifically to Kali, who actually has sufficient information to understand the reference I was making. You don't have that information, so your comment is irrelevant. He has not withdrawn his friendship even though I was quite critical of him with regard to his initial flaming of you. This is not about his 'flaming'; this is about him being a kook. And that has nothing to do with my comment, so what's your point? Everything he has done with regard to /me/ has been done to my benefit and advantage. If that's manipulation, I want more of it. You can be sure that I have given careful consideration to all the consequences of the position I've taken. More important to me than any single person or group of people in this dogfight is whether I will be able to look myself in the mirror when I'm done. Yes, I know this to be true about you. Dustin (remember him?) had too little faith in my ability to keep his confidence when I refused to choose between him and KMonster. In the face of his direct attack on me, I defended myself, but up to that point, most of what I said was in Dustin's favor, because in my opinion, the tactics being used on him weren't fair or right. It's not like I'm not consistent, Kali. If I had to bend myself like a pretzel over this, I wouldn't do it. Loyalty to a friend is keeping confidences and offering support in hard times, not defending the indefensible. We agree. -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay |
^
v
|
PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:47:21 -0700, miguel wrote:
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote: miguel: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology, wrote: miguel said: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote: miguel said: Dumbarse Git wrote: miguel: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you admit to in another thread), You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my occupation. I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key. yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said award. If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping yourself. Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice. The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your behalf? It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry, I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests. Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/ Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making entertainment out of a bully. And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your defense of him and wish you'd stop. I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me. Perhaps soon you may miss those days too. You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you decided to join in. So solly. Threat noted. I hope so. If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends[slap!] **** off, you little coward. You like threatening women, wimp? I'll bet it compensates for the testosterone shots you don't get anymore, nadless. Look at the nerd gimp retard fagboi puff his chest! Snork...it certainly is enlightening how much your rather sad attempts at insults give away your bigotry and your inner demons. miguel, bite my nuts klunt Find some nuts first you simpering coward. -- K. A. Cannon kcannon at insurgent dot org (change the orgy to org to reply) Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. -Charles Schultz |
PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:38:17 +0000 (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet
wrote: Kali wrote in : In , miguel mjc101 @gmail.com said: : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of : Psychology : (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote: : miguel said: : Dumbarse Git wrote: : miguel: : : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: : : You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which : you admit to in another thread), : : You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my : occupation. : : I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse Git. : If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth and : spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key. : : yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the : (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. : : I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments : ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody : please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm : beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the : equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to : said award. : : If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, : Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and : occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she : has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their : posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she : needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google : stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping : yourself. : : Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. : : You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, : what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you : all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice. : : The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour : to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on : your behalf? : : It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. : : Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and : let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his : unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry, : I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past : pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had : realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their : kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests. : : Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of : Wisconsin-Parkside, : http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/ : : Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or : voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making : entertainment out of a bully. : : And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does : affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you : hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your : defense of him and wish you'd stop. : : I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people : on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole : kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my : identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will : cause reputational and commercial damage to me. : : Perhaps soon you may miss those days too. : : You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you : decided to join in. So solly. : : miguel Threat noted. Maybe Cranston would like to threaten me next? I'm only working about two miles from the little dweeb. Ahem...it is a Usenet tradition that I be threatened first. Maybe he can make his threats to me personally too!! Scare me, mikey! add me to ur lits mikey!! -- K. A. Cannon kcannon at insurgent dot org (change the orgy to org to reply) Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. -Charles Schultz |
Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
..
|
.
|
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
"Meat Plow" wrote in message
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:25:00 -0400, Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: snipped In the more than...I saw something from a 2004 post that indicated it was 12 years then, so that would make it 15 years that Chaney has been acting like a psychopath online...Mike has made absolutely no effort to seek out Chaney and "put him in the hospital." That's what makes him a Kook and not a criminal. Mr. Plow, you have meant quite a lot to me for a relatively long time, and although my course is set here, it does not include arguing with you. So, I would hope that you and I could just agree to disagree--because afaic, he is not a kook--and let it go at that. snipped -- Rhonda Lea Kirk You must be the change you wish to see in the world. Mohandas K. Gandhi |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
"Meat Plow" wrote in message
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:16:11 -0400, Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: "Sean Monaghan" wrote in message miguel wrote in : Sean Monaghan wrote: "Rhonda Lea Kirk": That would lead me to the conclusion that someone is overreacting to words on the screen, and I don't mean Mike. See http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html#question27 "27. Can I really be thrown in jail for posting threatening messages? Yes. People have been tried and convicted for sending threatening or harassing Email or Usenet posts. We do NOT support censorship of the Internet; however, posting a message stating you are going to cause virtual or unvirtual harm to someone will probably gain you a visit from your Friendly Neighborhood FBI Agent." "Probably" gain you a visit from your Friendly Neighborhood FBI Agent? That's plain stupid. If Chaney wants to call the FBI and complain, more power to him. That would be one of the most hilarious things to happen 'round these parts in a while. It would be quite entertaining. That's the bit that you and your public defender are missing - AUK is *all* about entertainment. Always. No exceptions. Period. There is nothing entertaining for me in watching people that I used to like and respect fall and shatter their feet of clay. Then maybe it's time for you to move on my dear. Maybe AUK isn't the place for you? I'm inclined to see this through. After that, I'll decide. -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay |
PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
miguel wrote in : Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote: miguel: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology, wrote: miguel said: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote: miguel said: Dumbarse Git wrote: miguel: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you admit to in another thread), You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my occupation. I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key. yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said award. If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping yourself. Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice. The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your behalf? It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry, I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests. Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/ Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making entertainment out of a bully. And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your defense of him and wish you'd stop. I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me. Perhaps soon you may miss those days too. You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you decided to join in. So solly. Threat noted. I hope so. If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends[slap!] **** off, you little coward. You like threatening women, wimp? I'll bet it compensates for the testosterone shots you don't get anymore, nadless. Look at the nerd gimp retard fagboi puff his chest! The fag lames won't work. I'm a lesbian, st00pid. So keep trying to impress me with some more pathetic material the RSPW crowd would laugh at. I'll try not to laugh too hard[1] at you. [1] Left in to remind you what a powerless limpdick you are, douchebag. Sorry, I thought you were the guy around here who's supposed to have done the MMA training. I apologize for the fagboi crack. miguel |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:46:51 +0000, Sean Monaghan did the cha-cha, and
screamed: miguel wrote: Kali wrote: miguel said: : Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote: : Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking usenet to : real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to accomplish. : Good job there kOOk. : miguel So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney? If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence. This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar. This snippet of evidence not only justifies the open KotM nomination of Michael Cranston attorney, but it also qualifies him for the Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - AUK's highest lifetime-achievement award for stupidity. From - http://www.caballista.org/auk/awards.html "Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - The spoonerism for "dumb ****", for those who've lost more marbles than a Chinese Checker factory will ever make." I hereby nominate "Michael Cranston attorney"/Miguel to become Bolo Bullis Foam Duck #27. Seconds, anyone? Note - To those who will want to make the k'laim that this nomination is based on 'revenge' due to some coincidental flamewar in which I've never participated, let it be known that there have been many flamewars in which individual AUKers have participated where not a single nomination was ever made. Such k'laims are ludicrous, unfounded, and based on ignorance (and quite possibly, based on cluelessness) as opposed to being based on rational thought. snip Cran-foam Seconded! -- __________________________________________________ ______________________ Hail Eris! TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069 Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/ AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007 Message-ID: 1 WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, January 2007 MID: 70 "6. Who is a net.giggler?" -- Bloxy's "Monkay", that's who. Message-ID: "'I find this genetic sequence all the way down the evolutionary ladder,' he says. 'The major significance of this protein is that it may be a communication line between the nucleus and the mitochondria.'" -- Andrew B. Chung, from http://gtalumni.org/Publications/mag...n91/chung.html "Pot...kettle...so black it picks cotton." -- But Alex "Dink" Cain isn't racist at all, oh no. Not him. Why, some of his best friends are porch monkeys. I'll bet. Message-ID: "You think I don't know this? What gives you the right to speak as if you have authority over me? You have none. I like his use of the words 'wanton woman'. They are biblical. Maybe there is some hope for k man after all. You? There is no hope for you at all you freak of nature. Go back to the hole you came out of." -- Atlanta Olympiada Kane "knows" Kadaitcha Man was referring to me, but addressed him as though he was referring to himself, then foamed all over me, in Message-ID: "No effort at all c*cksucking you, b1tch." -- At last, the Monkey-man comes out of the closet, in MID: aXkth.3535$QE6.1902@trnddc02 http://www6.kingdomofloathing.com/login.php "This is a sandwich made by a Spam Witch. You know why Spam Witches can't starve if they're at the beach? Because they can always eat the sand which is there." -- Spam Witch sammich, from The Kingdom of Loathing http://www.runescape.com/ No one expects the Fannish Inquisition! http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Cabal_...y_Pretzel/join Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet & Usenet Terrorist Pretzel "i have no need for sex; i'd rather tease you, honeybuns." -- Teh Mop Jockey doesn't know the meaning of "TMI". MID: "What are marijuana tablets?" "When logic and proportion Have fallen softly dead And the White Knight is talking backwards And the Red Queen's 'off with her head!' Remember what the dormouse said: 'Feed your head Feed your head Feed your head'" -- "White Rabbit", Jefferson Airplane I own "James C Cracked is God!!!": MID: .com "Chips on you dud, you got bugged for being near me, Viruses transmit that way you know." -- Blooey: Master of the Autoflame. Message-ID: "The nonsense screeds you compose and post to usenet lack any kind of coherent and rational meaning whatsoever, and are composed of random bits and pieces stolen from mythology, science fiction, religion, comic books, etc., placed into a blender, and the switch turned to the highest setting. About every other screed has droppings of death threats, racial bigotry, laughably false prophesies of gloom and doom, and inane attempts to extort money. These bland, meaningless, pulpy messes are then trowled into usenet; identical or nearly identical screeds are repeated ad nauseum." -- Art Deco had to clean up bits of Warhol for days after using the Hammer on him "Q: How many Bush administration officials does it take to change a light bulb? A: None. There is no need to change anything. We made the right decision to stick with that light bulb. People who say that it is burned out are giving aid and encouragement to the Forces of Darkness." -- Anon. "Outlaw amateur assassins!" -- Chiun "Property is theft." -- P. J. Proudhon "Property is liberty." -- P. J. Proudhon "Property is impossible." -- P. J. Proudhon "Etymology: Argumentum ad Septicus : argument to putrefaction. Derived from Septicum Argumentum : putrefaction of argument. "Septic \Sep"tic\, Septical \Sep"tic*al\ a. [L. septicus to make putrid: cf. F. septique.] Having power to promote putrefaction. Of or relating to or caused by putrefaction." -- Kadaitcha Man, indirectly to Donald "Skeptic"/"Septic" Alford, in MID: "I never fail to be amazing" -- Looney Maroon for September 2006 nominee William Barwell's ego knows no bounds. MID: "Red meat won't hurt you. Fuzzy, blue-green meat will." -- Zog the etc., in alt.discordia (correct as needed) "may you live to whatever age you'd like to." -- Dave Hillstrom, in alt.discordia "We are most nearly ourselves when we achieve the seriousness of the child at play." -- Heraclitus "And thats another mistake on your part. Your 'playing' games on usenet, and I'm not playing...It has nothing to do with impressing you, it has more to do with making sure you have the education you'll need to debate. The debate is no fun for me if you are mentally incapable of it. I'm giving you an opportunity to educate yourself. That's all." -- A trashy former virus-writer turned Outer Filth doesn't know if he's playing or working, in MID: om "I am incapable of original thoughts" -- Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ has an honest moment, in MID: "But now the end is near. Now Mark Foley comes along and is making almost all liberal dreams come true and seriously, I'm sorry for it. See, I believe in karma. I believe what comes around goes around and I know full well that it's just bad juju to wish such a level of turmoil and ill upon other humans, warmongering gay-hating maladroits or no, and that the real path of enlightenment is paved with forgiveness and progress and white-hot love and turning the other cheek and scotch. "In fact, Jesus said something about that, I do believe. He said, "Knock it off already with the warmongering and the hating of each other and let's all get some wine and party like it's 2012." Then again, he never saw Karl Rove stab the nation with the dull ice pick of bogus fear. He never heard George W. Bush describe brutal war and the death of tens of thousands as "just a comma" in world history. "Check that. Maybe I'm not so sorry after all." -- Mark Morford, http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...ve/2006/10/11/ notes101106.DTL&nl=fix http://tinyurl.com/kusmr |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:39:26 -0700, miguel did the cha-cha, and screamed:
Kali wrote: Sean Monaghan said: miguel wrote: Sean Monaghan wrote: "Rhonda Lea Kirk": That would lead me to the conclusion that someone is overreacting to words on the screen, and I don't mean Mike. See http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html#question27 "27. Can I really be thrown in jail for posting threatening messages? Yes. People have been tried and convicted for sending threatening or harassing Email or Usenet posts. We do NOT support censorship of the Internet; however, posting a message stating you are going to cause virtual or unvirtual harm to someone will probably gain you a visit from your Friendly Neighborhood FBI Agent." "Probably" gain you a visit from your Friendly Neighborhood FBI Agent? That's plain stupid. If Chaney wants to call the FBI and complain, more power to him. That would be one of the most hilarious things to happen 'round these parts in a while. It would be quite entertaining. That's the bit that you and your public defender are missing - AUK is *all* about entertainment. Always. No exceptions. Period. That would be almost as entertaining as [name] filing a civil suit over having had his name and "dog****er" listed together in the Google archives. You are now participating in the google stacking effort yourself? That seems odd, as you acknowledged you've been a victim of it too. You see, Sean, on Usenet it's not ok to call [name] a "dog****er", but it is ok for him to make kooky death threats. Get it? lol Charlotte was right about me. I'm sorry you weren't more resilient. Well, at least you're not full of yourself, Michael J. "Dog****er" Cranston attorney k00k. -- __________________________________________________ ______________________ Hail Eris! TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069 Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/ AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007 Message-ID: 1 WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, January 2007 MID: 70 "6. Who is a net.giggler?" -- Bloxy's "Monkay", that's who. Message-ID: "'I find this genetic sequence all the way down the evolutionary ladder,' he says. 'The major significance of this protein is that it may be a communication line between the nucleus and the mitochondria.'" -- Andrew B. Chung, from http://gtalumni.org/Publications/mag...n91/chung.html "Pot...kettle...so black it picks cotton." -- But Alex "Dink" Cain isn't racist at all, oh no. Not him. Why, some of his best friends are porch monkeys. I'll bet. Message-ID: "You think I don't know this? What gives you the right to speak as if you have authority over me? You have none. I like his use of the words 'wanton woman'. They are biblical. Maybe there is some hope for k man after all. You? There is no hope for you at all you freak of nature. Go back to the hole you came out of." -- Atlanta Olympiada Kane "knows" Kadaitcha Man was referring to me, but addressed him as though he was referring to himself, then foamed all over me, in Message-ID: "No effort at all c*cksucking you, b1tch." -- At last, the Monkey-man comes out of the closet, in MID: aXkth.3535$QE6.1902@trnddc02 http://www6.kingdomofloathing.com/login.php "This is a sandwich made by a Spam Witch. You know why Spam Witches can't starve if they're at the beach? Because they can always eat the sand which is there." -- Spam Witch sammich, from The Kingdom of Loathing http://www.runescape.com/ No one expects the Fannish Inquisition! http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Cabal_...y_Pretzel/join Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet & Usenet Terrorist Pretzel "i have no need for sex; i'd rather tease you, honeybuns." -- Teh Mop Jockey doesn't know the meaning of "TMI". MID: "What are marijuana tablets?" "When logic and proportion Have fallen softly dead And the White Knight is talking backwards And the Red Queen's 'off with her head!' Remember what the dormouse said: 'Feed your head Feed your head Feed your head'" -- "White Rabbit", Jefferson Airplane I own "James C Cracked is God!!!": MID: .com "Chips on you dud, you got bugged for being near me, Viruses transmit that way you know." -- Blooey: Master of the Autoflame. Message-ID: "The nonsense screeds you compose and post to usenet lack any kind of coherent and rational meaning whatsoever, and are composed of random bits and pieces stolen from mythology, science fiction, religion, comic books, etc., placed into a blender, and the switch turned to the highest setting. About every other screed has droppings of death threats, racial bigotry, laughably false prophesies of gloom and doom, and inane attempts to extort money. These bland, meaningless, pulpy messes are then trowled into usenet; identical or nearly identical screeds are repeated ad nauseum." -- Art Deco had to clean up bits of Warhol for days after using the Hammer on him "Q: How many Bush administration officials does it take to change a light bulb? A: None. There is no need to change anything. We made the right decision to stick with that light bulb. People who say that it is burned out are giving aid and encouragement to the Forces of Darkness." -- Anon. "Outlaw amateur assassins!" -- Chiun "Property is theft." -- P. J. Proudhon "Property is liberty." -- P. J. Proudhon "Property is impossible." -- P. J. Proudhon "Etymology: Argumentum ad Septicus : argument to putrefaction. Derived from Septicum Argumentum : putrefaction of argument. "Septic \Sep"tic\, Septical \Sep"tic*al\ a. [L. septicus to make putrid: cf. F. septique.] Having power to promote putrefaction. Of or relating to or caused by putrefaction." -- Kadaitcha Man, indirectly to Donald "Skeptic"/"Septic" Alford, in MID: "I never fail to be amazing" -- Looney Maroon for September 2006 nominee William Barwell's ego knows no bounds. MID: "Red meat won't hurt you. Fuzzy, blue-green meat will." -- Zog the etc., in alt.discordia (correct as needed) "may you live to whatever age you'd like to." -- Dave Hillstrom, in alt.discordia "We are most nearly ourselves when we achieve the seriousness of the child at play." -- Heraclitus "And thats another mistake on your part. Your 'playing' games on usenet, and I'm not playing...It has nothing to do with impressing you, it has more to do with making sure you have the education you'll need to debate. The debate is no fun for me if you are mentally incapable of it. I'm giving you an opportunity to educate yourself. That's all." -- A trashy former virus-writer turned Outer Filth doesn't know if he's playing or working, in MID: om "I am incapable of original thoughts" -- Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ has an honest moment, in MID: "But now the end is near. Now Mark Foley comes along and is making almost all liberal dreams come true and seriously, I'm sorry for it. See, I believe in karma. I believe what comes around goes around and I know full well that it's just bad juju to wish such a level of turmoil and ill upon other humans, warmongering gay-hating maladroits or no, and that the real path of enlightenment is paved with forgiveness and progress and white-hot love and turning the other cheek and scotch. "In fact, Jesus said something about that, I do believe. He said, "Knock it off already with the warmongering and the hating of each other and let's all get some wine and party like it's 2012." Then again, he never saw Karl Rove stab the nation with the dull ice pick of bogus fear. He never heard George W. Bush describe brutal war and the death of tens of thousands as "just a comma" in world history. "Check that. Maybe I'm not so sorry after all." -- Mark Morford, http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...ve/2006/10/11/ notes101106.DTL&nl=fix http://tinyurl.com/kusmr |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:04:36 -0700, miguel did the cha-cha, and screamed:
Sean Monaghan wrote: miguel wrote: Kali wrote: miguel said: : Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote: Translation: even though all : kookologists agree that taking usenet to real life is prime : kooksign, that's what I'm trying to accomplish. : Good job there kOOk. : miguel So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney? If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence. This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar. Sean, Kali recently stated that she was considered the most reasonable and judicious of the kookologists. If by that she is contrasting herself with you, K-Bitch and ****stain, you can imagine the difficulty I or anybody else might have in giving her any points for that claim. You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken matters to RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of the extent to which his raging insanity has caused him to make unspeakably nasty claims about my children and my grandchild. Who cares? This is usenet. Charlotte, on the other hand, does. If you have any questions about whether Chaney deserves to have his ass kicked, feel free to direct them to her. Steve owns your brain as much as you own his. Now, onto the unarticulated premise of your post, viz: there is never any cause for threatening violence over a usenet post. Suppose Chaney says to your face about your 13 year old daughter, "Sean, are you bringing your 13 year old daughter in for the 1000 man **** tonight?" Do you put him on the ground and kick him, or do you play your usenet tard games? You do the latter if you're a coward. You do the former if you're a k00k. Why should the result be any different if he says it on usenet instead of to your face, particularly when part of his game is to say it often enough, and to use your daughter's actual name, so that she gets google stacked? K00k. -- __________________________________________________ ______________________ Hail Eris! TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069 Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/ AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007 Message-ID: 1 WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, January 2007 MID: 70 "6. Who is a net.giggler?" -- Bloxy's "Monkay", that's who. Message-ID: "'I find this genetic sequence all the way down the evolutionary ladder,' he says. 'The major significance of this protein is that it may be a communication line between the nucleus and the mitochondria.'" -- Andrew B. Chung, from http://gtalumni.org/Publications/mag...n91/chung.html "Pot...kettle...so black it picks cotton." -- But Alex "Dink" Cain isn't racist at all, oh no. Not him. Why, some of his best friends are porch monkeys. I'll bet. Message-ID: "You think I don't know this? What gives you the right to speak as if you have authority over me? You have none. I like his use of the words 'wanton woman'. They are biblical. Maybe there is some hope for k man after all. You? There is no hope for you at all you freak of nature. Go back to the hole you came out of." -- Atlanta Olympiada Kane "knows" Kadaitcha Man was referring to me, but addressed him as though he was referring to himself, then foamed all over me, in Message-ID: "No effort at all c*cksucking you, b1tch." -- At last, the Monkey-man comes out of the closet, in MID: aXkth.3535$QE6.1902@trnddc02 http://www6.kingdomofloathing.com/login.php "This is a sandwich made by a Spam Witch. You know why Spam Witches can't starve if they're at the beach? Because they can always eat the sand which is there." -- Spam Witch sammich, from The Kingdom of Loathing http://www.runescape.com/ No one expects the Fannish Inquisition! http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Cabal_...y_Pretzel/join Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet & Usenet Terrorist Pretzel "i have no need for sex; i'd rather tease you, honeybuns." -- Teh Mop Jockey doesn't know the meaning of "TMI". MID: "What are marijuana tablets?" "When logic and proportion Have fallen softly dead And the White Knight is talking backwards And the Red Queen's 'off with her head!' Remember what the dormouse said: 'Feed your head Feed your head Feed your head'" -- "White Rabbit", Jefferson Airplane I own "James C Cracked is God!!!": MID: .com "Chips on you dud, you got bugged for being near me, Viruses transmit that way you know." -- Blooey: Master of the Autoflame. Message-ID: "The nonsense screeds you compose and post to usenet lack any kind of coherent and rational meaning whatsoever, and are composed of random bits and pieces stolen from mythology, science fiction, religion, comic books, etc., placed into a blender, and the switch turned to the highest setting. About every other screed has droppings of death threats, racial bigotry, laughably false prophesies of gloom and doom, and inane attempts to extort money. These bland, meaningless, pulpy messes are then trowled into usenet; identical or nearly identical screeds are repeated ad nauseum." -- Art Deco had to clean up bits of Warhol for days after using the Hammer on him "Q: How many Bush administration officials does it take to change a light bulb? A: None. There is no need to change anything. We made the right decision to stick with that light bulb. People who say that it is burned out are giving aid and encouragement to the Forces of Darkness." -- Anon. "Outlaw amateur assassins!" -- Chiun "Property is theft." -- P. J. Proudhon "Property is liberty." -- P. J. Proudhon "Property is impossible." -- P. J. Proudhon "Etymology: Argumentum ad Septicus : argument to putrefaction. Derived from Septicum Argumentum : putrefaction of argument. "Septic \Sep"tic\, Septical \Sep"tic*al\ a. [L. septicus to make putrid: cf. F. septique.] Having power to promote putrefaction. Of or relating to or caused by putrefaction." -- Kadaitcha Man, indirectly to Donald "Skeptic"/"Septic" Alford, in MID: "I never fail to be amazing" -- Looney Maroon for September 2006 nominee William Barwell's ego knows no bounds. MID: "Red meat won't hurt you. Fuzzy, blue-green meat will." -- Zog the etc., in alt.discordia (correct as needed) "may you live to whatever age you'd like to." -- Dave Hillstrom, in alt.discordia "We are most nearly ourselves when we achieve the seriousness of the child at play." -- Heraclitus "And thats another mistake on your part. Your 'playing' games on usenet, and I'm not playing...It has nothing to do with impressing you, it has more to do with making sure you have the education you'll need to debate. The debate is no fun for me if you are mentally incapable of it. I'm giving you an opportunity to educate yourself. That's all." -- A trashy former virus-writer turned Outer Filth doesn't know if he's playing or working, in MID: om "I am incapable of original thoughts" -- Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ has an honest moment, in MID: "But now the end is near. Now Mark Foley comes along and is making almost all liberal dreams come true and seriously, I'm sorry for it. See, I believe in karma. I believe what comes around goes around and I know full well that it's just bad juju to wish such a level of turmoil and ill upon other humans, warmongering gay-hating maladroits or no, and that the real path of enlightenment is paved with forgiveness and progress and white-hot love and turning the other cheek and scotch. "In fact, Jesus said something about that, I do believe. He said, "Knock it off already with the warmongering and the hating of each other and let's all get some wine and party like it's 2012." Then again, he never saw Karl Rove stab the nation with the dull ice pick of bogus fear. He never heard George W. Bush describe brutal war and the death of tens of thousands as "just a comma" in world history. "Check that. Maybe I'm not so sorry after all." -- Mark Morford, http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...ve/2006/10/11/ notes101106.DTL&nl=fix http://tinyurl.com/kusmr |
Charlotte Blackmer approves of real life threats. 100%.
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 02:37:00 +0000, Steve Chaney, still taunting the happy
fun ball did the cha-cha, and screamed: Sean Monaghan wrote: miguel wrote: Kali wrote: miguel said: : Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote: : Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking usenet : to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to : accomplish. : Good job there kOOk. : miguel So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney? If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^ This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence. This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar. Charlotte Blackmer will not call Mike out on this. Hey, Mike's her friend -- but notice that she isn't defending him, at least not in this thread. -- Steve, her hammer of thor is borked. You are, however, still a k00k. -- __________________________________________________ ______________________ Hail Eris! TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069 Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/ AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007 Message-ID: 1 WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, January 2007 MID: 70 "6. Who is a net.giggler?" -- Bloxy's "Monkay", that's who. Message-ID: "'I find this genetic sequence all the way down the evolutionary ladder,' he says. 'The major significance of this protein is that it may be a communication line between the nucleus and the mitochondria.'" -- Andrew B. Chung, from http://gtalumni.org/Publications/mag...n91/chung.html "Pot...kettle...so black it picks cotton." -- But Alex "Dink" Cain isn't racist at all, oh no. Not him. Why, some of his best friends are porch monkeys. I'll bet. Message-ID: "You think I don't know this? What gives you the right to speak as if you have authority over me? You have none. I like his use of the words 'wanton woman'. They are biblical. Maybe there is some hope for k man after all. You? There is no hope for you at all you freak of nature. Go back to the hole you came out of." -- Atlanta Olympiada Kane "knows" Kadaitcha Man was referring to me, but addressed him as though he was referring to himself, then foamed all over me, in Message-ID: "No effort at all c*cksucking you, b1tch." -- At last, the Monkey-man comes out of the closet, in MID: aXkth.3535$QE6.1902@trnddc02 http://www6.kingdomofloathing.com/login.php "This is a sandwich made by a Spam Witch. You know why Spam Witches can't starve if they're at the beach? Because they can always eat the sand which is there." -- Spam Witch sammich, from The Kingdom of Loathing http://www.runescape.com/ No one expects the Fannish Inquisition! http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Cabal_...y_Pretzel/join Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet & Usenet Terrorist Pretzel "i have no need for sex; i'd rather tease you, honeybuns." -- Teh Mop Jockey doesn't know the meaning of "TMI". MID: "What are marijuana tablets?" "When logic and proportion Have fallen softly dead And the White Knight is talking backwards And the Red Queen's 'off with her head!' Remember what the dormouse said: 'Feed your head Feed your head Feed your head'" -- "White Rabbit", Jefferson Airplane I own "James C Cracked is God!!!": MID: .com "Chips on you dud, you got bugged for being near me, Viruses transmit that way you know." -- Blooey: Master of the Autoflame. Message-ID: "The nonsense screeds you compose and post to usenet lack any kind of coherent and rational meaning whatsoever, and are composed of random bits and pieces stolen from mythology, science fiction, religion, comic books, etc., placed into a blender, and the switch turned to the highest setting. About every other screed has droppings of death threats, racial bigotry, laughably false prophesies of gloom and doom, and inane attempts to extort money. These bland, meaningless, pulpy messes are then trowled into usenet; identical or nearly identical screeds are repeated ad nauseum." -- Art Deco had to clean up bits of Warhol for days after using the Hammer on him "Q: How many Bush administration officials does it take to change a light bulb? A: None. There is no need to change anything. We made the right decision to stick with that light bulb. People who say that it is burned out are giving aid and encouragement to the Forces of Darkness." -- Anon. "Outlaw amateur assassins!" -- Chiun "Property is theft." -- P. J. Proudhon "Property is liberty." -- P. J. Proudhon "Property is impossible." -- P. J. Proudhon "Etymology: Argumentum ad Septicus : argument to putrefaction. Derived from Septicum Argumentum : putrefaction of argument. "Septic \Sep"tic\, Septical \Sep"tic*al\ a. [L. septicus to make putrid: cf. F. septique.] Having power to promote putrefaction. Of or relating to or caused by putrefaction." -- Kadaitcha Man, indirectly to Donald "Skeptic"/"Septic" Alford, in MID: "I never fail to be amazing" -- Looney Maroon for September 2006 nominee William Barwell's ego knows no bounds. MID: "Red meat won't hurt you. Fuzzy, blue-green meat will." -- Zog the etc., in alt.discordia (correct as needed) "may you live to whatever age you'd like to." -- Dave Hillstrom, in alt.discordia "We are most nearly ourselves when we achieve the seriousness of the child at play." -- Heraclitus "And thats another mistake on your part. Your 'playing' games on usenet, and I'm not playing...It has nothing to do with impressing you, it has more to do with making sure you have the education you'll need to debate. The debate is no fun for me if you are mentally incapable of it. I'm giving you an opportunity to educate yourself. That's all." -- A trashy former virus-writer turned Outer Filth doesn't know if he's playing or working, in MID: om "I am incapable of original thoughts" -- Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ has an honest moment, in MID: "But now the end is near. Now Mark Foley comes along and is making almost all liberal dreams come true and seriously, I'm sorry for it. See, I believe in karma. I believe what comes around goes around and I know full well that it's just bad juju to wish such a level of turmoil and ill upon other humans, warmongering gay-hating maladroits or no, and that the real path of enlightenment is paved with forgiveness and progress and white-hot love and turning the other cheek and scotch. "In fact, Jesus said something about that, I do believe. He said, "Knock it off already with the warmongering and the hating of each other and let's all get some wine and party like it's 2012." Then again, he never saw Karl Rove stab the nation with the dull ice pick of bogus fear. He never heard George W. Bush describe brutal war and the death of tens of thousands as "just a comma" in world history. "Check that. Maybe I'm not so sorry after all." -- Mark Morford, http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...ve/2006/10/11/ notes101106.DTL&nl=fix http://tinyurl.com/kusmr |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:04:36 -0700, miguel did the cha-cha, and screamed:
You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken matters to RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of the extent to which his raging insanity has caused him to make unspeakably nasty claims about my children and my grandchild. BTW, all of that **** from Steve was foam, and you ought to have just totted up your Usenet Valhalla points. Instead, you went to K00k Valhalla along with Steve. -- __________________________________________________ ______________________ Hail Eris! TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069 Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/ AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007 Message-ID: 1 WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, January 2007 MID: 70 "6. Who is a net.giggler?" -- Bloxy's "Monkay", that's who. Message-ID: "'I find this genetic sequence all the way down the evolutionary ladder,' he says. 'The major significance of this protein is that it may be a communication line between the nucleus and the mitochondria.'" -- Andrew B. Chung, from http://gtalumni.org/Publications/mag...n91/chung.html "Pot...kettle...so black it picks cotton." -- But Alex "Dink" Cain isn't racist at all, oh no. Not him. Why, some of his best friends are porch monkeys. I'll bet. Message-ID: "You think I don't know this? What gives you the right to speak as if you have authority over me? You have none. I like his use of the words 'wanton woman'. They are biblical. Maybe there is some hope for k man after all. You? There is no hope for you at all you freak of nature. Go back to the hole you came out of." -- Atlanta Olympiada Kane "knows" Kadaitcha Man was referring to me, but addressed him as though he was referring to himself, then foamed all over me, in Message-ID: "No effort at all c*cksucking you, b1tch." -- At last, the Monkey-man comes out of the closet, in MID: aXkth.3535$QE6.1902@trnddc02 http://www6.kingdomofloathing.com/login.php "This is a sandwich made by a Spam Witch. You know why Spam Witches can't starve if they're at the beach? Because they can always eat the sand which is there." -- Spam Witch sammich, from The Kingdom of Loathing http://www.runescape.com/ No one expects the Fannish Inquisition! http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Cabal_...y_Pretzel/join Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet & Usenet Terrorist Pretzel "i have no need for sex; i'd rather tease you, honeybuns." -- Teh Mop Jockey doesn't know the meaning of "TMI". MID: "What are marijuana tablets?" "When logic and proportion Have fallen softly dead And the White Knight is talking backwards And the Red Queen's 'off with her head!' Remember what the dormouse said: 'Feed your head Feed your head Feed your head'" -- "White Rabbit", Jefferson Airplane I own "James C Cracked is God!!!": MID: .com "Chips on you dud, you got bugged for being near me, Viruses transmit that way you know." -- Blooey: Master of the Autoflame. Message-ID: "The nonsense screeds you compose and post to usenet lack any kind of coherent and rational meaning whatsoever, and are composed of random bits and pieces stolen from mythology, science fiction, religion, comic books, etc., placed into a blender, and the switch turned to the highest setting. About every other screed has droppings of death threats, racial bigotry, laughably false prophesies of gloom and doom, and inane attempts to extort money. These bland, meaningless, pulpy messes are then trowled into usenet; identical or nearly identical screeds are repeated ad nauseum." -- Art Deco had to clean up bits of Warhol for days after using the Hammer on him "Q: How many Bush administration officials does it take to change a light bulb? A: None. There is no need to change anything. We made the right decision to stick with that light bulb. People who say that it is burned out are giving aid and encouragement to the Forces of Darkness." -- Anon. "Outlaw amateur assassins!" -- Chiun "Property is theft." -- P. J. Proudhon "Property is liberty." -- P. J. Proudhon "Property is impossible." -- P. J. Proudhon "Etymology: Argumentum ad Septicus : argument to putrefaction. Derived from Septicum Argumentum : putrefaction of argument. "Septic \Sep"tic\, Septical \Sep"tic*al\ a. [L. septicus to make putrid: cf. F. septique.] Having power to promote putrefaction. Of or relating to or caused by putrefaction." -- Kadaitcha Man, indirectly to Donald "Skeptic"/"Septic" Alford, in MID: "I never fail to be amazing" -- Looney Maroon for September 2006 nominee William Barwell's ego knows no bounds. MID: "Red meat won't hurt you. Fuzzy, blue-green meat will." -- Zog the etc., in alt.discordia (correct as needed) "may you live to whatever age you'd like to." -- Dave Hillstrom, in alt.discordia "We are most nearly ourselves when we achieve the seriousness of the child at play." -- Heraclitus "And thats another mistake on your part. Your 'playing' games on usenet, and I'm not playing...It has nothing to do with impressing you, it has more to do with making sure you have the education you'll need to debate. The debate is no fun for me if you are mentally incapable of it. I'm giving you an opportunity to educate yourself. That's all." -- A trashy former virus-writer turned Outer Filth doesn't know if he's playing or working, in MID: om "I am incapable of original thoughts" -- Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ has an honest moment, in MID: "But now the end is near. Now Mark Foley comes along and is making almost all liberal dreams come true and seriously, I'm sorry for it. See, I believe in karma. I believe what comes around goes around and I know full well that it's just bad juju to wish such a level of turmoil and ill upon other humans, warmongering gay-hating maladroits or no, and that the real path of enlightenment is paved with forgiveness and progress and white-hot love and turning the other cheek and scotch. "In fact, Jesus said something about that, I do believe. He said, "Knock it off already with the warmongering and the hating of each other and let's all get some wine and party like it's 2012." Then again, he never saw Karl Rove stab the nation with the dull ice pick of bogus fear. He never heard George W. Bush describe brutal war and the death of tens of thousands as "just a comma" in world history. "Check that. Maybe I'm not so sorry after all." -- Mark Morford, http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...ve/2006/10/11/ notes101106.DTL&nl=fix http://tinyurl.com/kusmr |
*Ping* Trippy - Bobo Pool submission { PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}}
In , Rhonda Lea Kirk
said: : "Sean Monaghan" wrote in message : : miguel wrote in : : : : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of : Psychology, wrote: : miguel said: : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department : of Psychology : (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote: : miguel said: : Dumbarse Git wrote: : miguel: : : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: : : You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which : you admit to in another thread), : : You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my : occupation. : : I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse : Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth : and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key. : : yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the : (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. : : I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments : ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody : please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? : I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about : the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense : to said award. : : If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, : Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and : occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she : has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their : posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she : needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the : google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about : stopping yourself. : : Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. : : You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, : what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you : all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your : choice. : : The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour : to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on : your behalf? : : It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. : : Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and : let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his : unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry, : I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past : pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had : realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their : kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests. : : Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University : of Wisconsin-Parkside, : http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/ : : Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or : voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making : entertainment out of a bully. : : And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does : affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you : hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your : defense of him and wish you'd stop. : : I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with : people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having : asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain : get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a : way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me. : : Perhaps soon you may miss those days too. : : You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you : decided to join in. So solly. : : Threat noted. : : I hope so. : : If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are, : frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy to : pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois hold the : keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of : Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology. : : Wow. Extortion attempt. : : No. : : It's negotiation: Everyone stops. ****ing wrong, Rhonda. We discussed this the other day. I stand by what I said, that I don't think it's right to Google stack, and I certainly don't indend to call *anyone* a "dog****er". I thought I made that clear. The discussion was double standards and miguel's kooky threats. I made an example comparison (libel and assault). In my comparison, I used his last name and the word "dog****er". Then your sweetheart came back and spammed my full name and office address several times. He upped the anti. He was probably so foamy he thought I was chiming in with the others, so instead of seeking clarification, he shot his load, revealing his true character: that of a coward no better than Brad Jesness. I explained this in fewer words in an earlier post, and his response was to repeat his cowardly behavior. No remorse, if in fact he did jump the gun. It wasn't negotiation, it was retaliation. Call a spade a spade. Your "ethics" are highly conditional, aren't they? : The problem is, you give every indication of holding the belief that you : should be able to continue what you started and that Mike has no right : to attempt to mitigate his damages. : : Equity is for everyone, Sean. : : Yo, Moonbeam - we[TINW] have a new submission for the Bobo pool. : Pleace to consider this frothing maniac for odds. Thanks in advance. : : http://www.alcatroll.com/sean/miguel : Kali -- "If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?" - Albert Einstein |
PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
In , Cujo
DeSockpuppet said: : K. A. Cannon wrote in : : : : On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:38:17 +0000 (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet : wrote: : : Kali wrote in : m: : : In , miguel mjc101 : @gmail.com said: : : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department : : of Psychology : : (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote: : : miguel said: : : Dumbarse Git wrote: : : miguel: : : : : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: : : : : You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which : : you admit to in another thread), : : : : You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my : : occupation. : : : : I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse : : Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth : : and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key. : : : : yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the : : (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. : : : : I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments : : ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody : : please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? : : I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about : : the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense : : to said award. : : : : If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, : : Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and : : occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she : : has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their : : posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she : : needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the : : google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about : : stopping yourself. : : : : Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. : : : : You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, : : what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you : : all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your : : choice. : : : : The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour : : to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise : : on your behalf? : : : : It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. : : : : Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and : : let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his : : unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry, : : I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past : : pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had : : realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their : : kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests. : : : : Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University : : of Wisconsin-Parkside, : : http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/ : : : : Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or : : voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making : : entertainment out of a bully. : : : : And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does : : affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you : : hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your : : defense of him and wish you'd stop. : : : : I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with : : people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having : : asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain : : get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a : : way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me. : : : : Perhaps soon you may miss those days too. : : : : You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you : : decided to join in. So solly. : : : : miguel : : Threat noted. : : Maybe Cranston would like to threaten me next? I'm only working about : two miles from the little dweeb. No bus ticket required? Sorry, lezbo, cowards like him don't make threats against people who would actually take him up on it. Far easier to threaten a woman half way across the country, and let net.stalkers take up your cause. : Ahem...it is a Usenet tradition that I be threatened first. The early bird catches the worm, Kev. : Yeah? You forgot to tell Foamboi. : : Maybe he can make his threats to me personally too!! : : Tell the nutless ****wit you're female. It brings out the bestest k00ky : threats in mikey. : : Scare me, mikey! : : add me to ur lits mikey!! : : Day-yum, I hace been teh litsiest! Thanks for reminding moi! Lits whores, the both of you. Kali -- "If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?" - Albert Einstein |
*Ping* Trippy - Bobo Pool submission { PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}}
"Kali" wrote in message
In , Rhonda Lea Kirk said: "Sean Monaghan" wrote in message miguel wrote in : snipped for clarity If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are, frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy to pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois hold the keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology. Wow. Extortion attempt. No. It's negotiation: Everyone stops. ****ing wrong, Rhonda. We discussed this the other day. I stand by what I said, that I don't think it's right to Google stack, and I certainly don't indend to call *anyone* a "dog****er". I thought I made that clear. I thought you did too. Then you posted this: Message-ID: The discussion was double standards and miguel's kooky threats. I made an example comparison (libel and assault). In my comparison, I used his last name and the word "dog****er". That's not what I read. And if you follow the context in date and time order, he asked for clarification before he retaliated. Your response included calling him a clown. Then your sweetheart came back and spammed my full name and office address several times. He upped the anti. He was probably so foamy he thought I was chiming in with the others, so instead of seeking clarification, he shot his load, revealing his true character: that of a coward no better than Brad Jesness. I explained this in fewer words in an earlier post, and his response was to repeat his cowardly behavior. No remorse, if in fact he did jump the gun. I have read through that part of the thread more than a few times, and I'm not getting from there to here. See above. It wasn't negotiation, it was retaliation. Call a spade a spade. He retaliated, and then he offered a mutual cease-fire. It was characterized as "extortion." I disagree that it is extortion. What I keep hearing over and over again is that he's supposed to sit back and let auk have its fun at his expense. If you set the standard, you have to live with it. You said he upped the ante, but all he did was level the field. A web page for a web page, identifying information for identifying information. "Fair," to me, does not mean "advantage to one side." Your "ethics" are highly conditional, aren't they? You called him a dog****er. You minimized the gravity and impact of calling him a dog****er even though I objected to it strongly many posts ago. How does that make /my/ ethics conditional? I've been consistent about what I think all along. And the one thing I have not done to you is threaten loss of friendship to influence your behavior, but you did that to me way back he On other less talked about matters: It is unfortunate that a so-called friend of yours and Rhonda's would show such blithe disregard for your friendship by attacking your friends. I have higher standards for friendship. and In reality, this kind of thing does have an impact on perceived friendships. Mike has never asked me to choose between you, and he hasn't punished me for disagreeing with him when I thought he was wrong. Nor has he used me as a bat against you. Everyone is entitled to their opinon, Kali. In this case, yours and mine do not agree. snipped -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay |
PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Kali wrote in
: In , Cujo DeSockpuppet said: : K. A. Cannon wrote in : : : : On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:38:17 +0000 (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet : wrote: : : Kali wrote in : m: : : In , miguel mjc101 : @gmail.com said: : : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, : : Department of Psychology : : (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) : : wrote: : : miguel said: : : Dumbarse Git wrote: : : miguel: : : : : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: : : : : You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation : : (which you admit to in another thread), : : : : You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my : : occupation. : : : : I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse : : Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the : : froth and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" : : key. : : : : yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the : : (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. : : : : I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who : : moments ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will : : somebody please nominate you for some steaming pile of : : hypocrisy award? I'm beginning to think that your : : intellectual prowess is about the equivalent of ****stain's, : : which would be your only defense to said award. : : : : If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, : : Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and : : occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated : : she has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with : : their posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, : : all she needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation : : in the google stacking. If you are her friend, you might : : think about stopping yourself. : : : : Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. : : : : You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for : : this, what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, : : too. If you all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop : : too. Your choice. : : : : The question is - will your public defender find this : : behaviour to be acceptable, or will that person continue to : : rationalise on your behalf? : : : : It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. : : : : Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and : : let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his : : unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry, : : I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past : : pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I : : had realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their : : kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests. : : : : Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, : : University of Wisconsin-Parkside, : : http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/ : : : : Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or : : voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making : : entertainment out of a bully. : : : : And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does : : affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case : : you hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at : : your defense of him and wish you'd stop. : : : : I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with : : people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without : : having asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and : : ****stain get all my identifying information out front and : : center, and in a way that will cause reputational and commercial : : damage to me. : : : : Perhaps soon you may miss those days too. : : : : You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact : : you decided to join in. So solly. : : : : miguel : : Threat noted. : : Maybe Cranston would like to threaten me next? I'm only working : about two miles from the little dweeb. No bus ticket required? It's optional depending on where the closest PF Chang's is located. Sorry, lezbo, cowards like him don't make threats against people who would actually take him up on it. Far easier to threaten a woman half way across the country, and let net.stalkers take up your cause. That's what I get for outing myself. : Ahem...it is a Usenet tradition that I be threatened first. The early bird catches the worm, Kev. I demand to be the first lesbian threatened at all times. : Yeah? You forgot to tell Foamboi. : : Maybe he can make his threats to me personally too!! : : Tell the nutless ****wit you're female. It brings out the bestest : k00ky threats in mikey. : : Scare me, mikey! : : add me to ur lits mikey!! : : Day-yum, I hace been teh litsiest! Thanks for reminding moi! Lits whores, the both of you. It's not how many times you've been litsed, it's how many *recently*. |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
"The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity"
wrote in message On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:04:36 -0700, miguel did the cha-cha, and screamed: You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken matters to RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of the extent to which his raging insanity has caused him to make unspeakably nasty claims about my children and my grandchild. BTW, all of that **** from Steve was foam, and you ought to have just totted up your Usenet Valhalla points. Instead, you went to K00k Valhalla along with Steve. His /auk/ Valhalla points, don't you mean? auk is not the usenet police, right? And it doesn't set the standards for other groups, right? soc.singles seems to have an entirely different culture from auk, Snarky. Are you saying that auk's rules still apply? Further, I take note that Chaney carries Mike's name and address around in his sig. Is that just foam too? I'm not inclined to try to untangle a decade and a half of history for a single newsgroup. I just don't have the time. But Chaney has given me a creepy feeling since the first time I read one of his posts, so I think I'll go with that when it comes to assessing who is right and who is wrong in this. -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay |
Charlotte Blackmer approves of real life threats. 100%.
"The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity"
wrote in message On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 02:37:00 +0000, Steve Chaney, still taunting the happy fun ball did the cha-cha, and screamed: Sean Monaghan wrote: miguel wrote: Kali wrote: miguel said: Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote: Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking usenet to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to accomplish. Good job there kOOk. miguel So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney? If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence. This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar. Charlotte Blackmer will not call Mike out on this. Hey, Mike's her friend -- but notice that she isn't defending him, at least not in this thread. She made five posts three days ago, and nothing before that since March 10. In in her most recent posting, she wrote: "Um, well, I don't think Sharon and Snarky have exactly covered themselves with glory in their exchanges with Mike. But it is what it is. If it's any consolation to them, I have observed that Mike does seem to have a talent for bringing out the absolute worst in some people. Sometime he uses his powers for good, sometimes not ;). But anyone who seems to expect me to keep Mike in line is on another planet." She has said her real life is busy. Perhaps that's the explanation for her absence in this thread. -- Steve, her hammer of thor is borked. You are, however, still a k00k. -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
"Meat Plow" wrote in message
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:27:50 -0400, Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: "Meat Plow" wrote in message On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:16:11 -0400, Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: "Sean Monaghan" wrote in message miguel wrote in : Sean Monaghan wrote: "Rhonda Lea Kirk": That would lead me to the conclusion that someone is overreacting to words on the screen, and I don't mean Mike. See http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html#question27 "27. Can I really be thrown in jail for posting threatening messages? Yes. People have been tried and convicted for sending threatening or harassing Email or Usenet posts. We do NOT support censorship of the Internet; however, posting a message stating you are going to cause virtual or unvirtual harm to someone will probably gain you a visit from your Friendly Neighborhood FBI Agent." "Probably" gain you a visit from your Friendly Neighborhood FBI Agent? That's plain stupid. If Chaney wants to call the FBI and complain, more power to him. That would be one of the most hilarious things to happen 'round these parts in a while. It would be quite entertaining. That's the bit that you and your public defender are missing - AUK is *all* about entertainment. Always. No exceptions. Period. There is nothing entertaining for me in watching people that I used to like and respect fall and shatter their feet of clay. Then maybe it's time for you to move on my dear. Maybe AUK isn't the place for you? I'm inclined to see this through. After that, I'll decide. I have your best interests at heart. You know I'm not a ruthless person nor a fanatic where AUK is concerned. Hit me on the messenger, I'd like to chat for a bit. Tonight will be good for another 30 minutes or so. I didn't see this until this morning. In my estimation, the damage--on both sides--is past the point of well-done, but I will be happy to fill you in on such bits of information that I am not otherwise constrained to keep to myself. You still won't have the entire story, but it might make more sense. -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 {NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
The Original Demon Prince of ****stain wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:04:36 -0700, miguel did the cha-cha, and screamed: You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken matters to RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of the extent to which his raging insanity has caused him to make unspeakably nasty claims about my children and my grandchild. BTW, all of that **** from Steve was foam, and you ought to have just totted up your Usenet Valhalla points. Instead, you went to K00k Valhalla along with Steve. Since you are unaware of all that Steve wrote, your opinion about this is as useless as your employment prospects, gimp. miguel |
*Ping* Trippy - Bobo Pool submission { PING Rhonda...
Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology wrote: Rhonda Lea Kirk said Sean Dumbarse Git wrote miguel wrote Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology, wrote miguel said Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote miguel said Dumbarse Git wrote miguel Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you admit to in another thread), You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my occupation. I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key. yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said award. If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping yourself. Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice. The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your behalf? It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry, I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests. Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/ Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making entertainment out of a bully. And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your defense of him and wish you'd stop. I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me. Perhaps soon you may miss those days too. You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you decided to join in. So solly. Threat noted. I hope so. If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are, frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy to pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois hold the keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology. Wow. Extortion attempt. No. It's negotiation: Everyone stops. ****ing wrong, Rhonda. We discussed this the other day. I stand by what I said, that I don't think it's right to Google stack, and I certainly don't indend to call *anyone* a "dog****er". I thought I made that clear. Yet you did it anyway. The discussion was double standards and miguel's kooky threats. I made an example comparison (libel and assault). In my comparison, I used his last name and the word "dog****er". Then your sweetheart came back and spammed my full name and office address several times. He upped the anti. It's "ante," Doc. You probably know that in your less foamy moments, though. And yes, I did. Sometimes that happens when you are at a poker table. He was probably so foamy he thought I was chiming in with the others, so instead of seeking clarification, he shot his load, revealing his true character: that of a coward no better than Brad Jesness. So it is safe to say that you consider Sean, K-Bitch, Bill and ****stain to be no better than Brad Jesness? They have done to me precisely what I am doing to you. I explained this in fewer words in an earlier post, and his response was to repeat his cowardly behavior. No remorse, if in fact he did jump the gun. It wasn't negotiation, it was retaliation. Call a spade a spade. You are not very bright, so let me spell this out for you as simply as I can. Rhonda called my offer for a cease fire negotiation, after Sean called it extortion. Her comment did not pertain to the original act of posting your personal information. Your "ethics" are highly conditional, aren't they? You are not intelligent enough to reconcile them. The problem is, you give every indication of holding the belief that you should be able to continue what you started and that Mike has no right to attempt to mitigate his damages. Equity is for everyone, Sean. I agree with this part of the post. 100% Yo, Moonbeam - we[TINW] have a new submission for the Bobo pool. Pleace to consider this frothing maniac for odds. Thanks in advance. http//www.alcatroll.com/sean/miguel Kali [Kimberly K. Barnard, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Parkside] miguel |
*Ping* Trippy - Bobo Pool submission { PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}}
miguel wrote in
: Kim DYOFDW, asswipe. |
.`
`/
|
PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
K. A. Cannon wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:47:21 -0700, miguel wrote: Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote: miguel: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology, wrote: miguel said: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote: miguel said: Dumbarse Git wrote: miguel: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you admit to in another thread), You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my occupation. I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key. yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said award. If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping yourself. Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice. The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your behalf? It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry, I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests. Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/ Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making entertainment out of a bully. And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your defense of him and wish you'd stop. I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me. Perhaps soon you may miss those days too. You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you decided to join in. So solly. Threat noted. I hope so. If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends[slap!] **** off, you little coward. You like threatening women, wimp? I'll bet it compensates for the testosterone shots you don't get anymore, nadless. Look at the nerd gimp retard fagboi puff his chest! Snork...it certainly is enlightening how much your rather sad attempts at insults give away your bigotry and your inner demons. At the core, he's really just a saucerhead -- nothing but gay lames. miguel, bite my nuts klunt Find some nuts first you simpering coward. -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco "To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert |
PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
Kali wrote in : In , Cujo DeSockpuppet said: : K. A. Cannon wrote in : : : : On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:38:17 +0000 (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet : wrote: : : Kali wrote in : m: : : In , miguel mjc101 : @gmail.com said: [...] : Yeah? You forgot to tell Foamboi. : : Maybe he can make his threats to me personally too!! : : Tell the nutless ****wit you're female. It brings out the bestest : k00ky threats in mikey. : : Scare me, mikey! : : add me to ur lits mikey!! : : Day-yum, I hace been teh litsiest! Thanks for reminding moi! Lits whores, the both of you. It's not how many times you've been litsed, it's how many *recently*. Ahem -- I've been on all the recent G-dolf lits. -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco "To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert |
Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
On Mar 16, 5:42 pm, Sean Monaghan wrote:
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote : Life-threatening? Any type of a beating that requires hospitalisation is potentially life-threatening. Human beings are terribly fragile. You can avoid inflicting death fairly reliably by concentrating on the extremities: knees, feet, fingers, arms and legs. If Mike has been practicing martial arts for all this time it is likely that he is able to inflict a beating upon an unarmed opponent without killing him or endangering his life. Of course, this would be bad practice. It is quite likely that if such a confrontation escalated into fatal violence it would be because of the introduction of a weapon by the alleged victim, Mr. Chaney who has made no secret of his love of guns. Crash Street Kidd |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity
wrote in : On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:04:36 -0700, miguel did the cha-cha, and screamed: Sean Monaghan wrote: miguel wrote: Kali wrote: miguel said: : Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote: Translation: even though : all kookologists agree that taking usenet to real life is prime : kooksign, that's what I'm trying to accomplish. : Good job there kOOk. miguel So, what are your plans for Steve : Cheney? If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence. This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar. Sean, Kali recently stated that she was considered the most reasonable and judicious of the kookologists. If by that she is contrasting herself with you, K-Bitch and ****stain, you can imagine the difficulty I or anybody else might have in giving her any points for that claim. You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken matters to RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of the extent to which his raging insanity has caused him to make unspeakably nasty claims about my children and my grandchild. Who cares? This is usenet. Did you read the first sentence? When matters are taken into real life, why is it so unreasonable to respond in real life? Miguel has merely written on usenet what he would like to do in real life in response to what someone has done to him in real life. This whole "it's only words on a screen" is hogwash because it neglects any context. It's not such a black and white issue. An appropriate response depends on what those words are, and whose screen on which they appear. For example, what if those words happen to contain numbers as well, such as a SSN and credit card information, and those words appear on the screen of identity thieves? Have a read on this identify theft victims story and then tell me that Miguel or any other kook on your list deserves a similar fate? What if the "words on a screen" are a complete fabrication and appear the the screen of your employer, or if you're self employeed, potential customers. Words on a screen can have real life impact, and to categorically label someone as a kook because he/she writes on usenet what he would like to do in real life, is absurd. IMHO, the fact that Miguel has been busting the balls and trolling kookologist with great succes is the only reason that he's been nominated for one of your infantile awards. |
Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
On Mar 16, 9:07 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote:
"Kali" wrote in message In , Rhonda Lea Kirk said: "Kali" wrote in message m In , miguel mjc101 @gmail.com said: Dumbarse Git wrote: miguel: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you admit to in another thread), yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said award. If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping yourself. Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice. The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your behalf? It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. miguel I didn't mention your full name or your occupation (let alone your work location), you filthy kook. You have serious reading comprehension problems. I've explained my position on this very well, and I maintain that position. I merely cited an example to make a point. You, being the kooky bully you are, saw a threat in it and decided you were going to do the same thing, only turn it up a notch. That's what narcissistic kooks do. The more you write, the kookier you seem. You're so bent on your kooky mission that you're willing to drag Rhonda through hell for it. Say what you want, and have Rhonda try to defend you, but kooky is as kooky does. This post is just another example. He's not responsible for my choices. His transparent manipulation of you aside... He was a friend to me when I was being batted around like a cat toy, and auk was giving out an undeserved Salinger for a troll that did me a lot of emotional damage. He has not withdrawn his friendship even though I was quite critical of him with regard to his initial flaming of you. Everything he has done with regard to /me/ has been done to my benefit and advantage. If that's manipulation, I want more of it. Some of these people need to grow up. Miguel does behave badly on occasion but you need to look the "threats" and flaming in context. If you are going to go after uninvolved family members, then you can expect that people will bear animosity toward the author of those tactics as Miguel does towards Steve. Those of you whining about miguel's tactics of outing your real names need to stop doing it to him. From here it looks like all the unholy howling is hypocritical. I have been on the receiving and sending end of justified and unjustified attacks by and on Miguel in the past but I got over it. You should get over it too. I respect him now. HTH. Crash Street Kidd |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 {NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
John Fereira wrote:
The Original Demon Prince of ****stain: Miguel: snip You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken matters to RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of the extent to which his raging insanity has caused him to make unspeakably nasty claims about my children and my grandchild. Who cares? This is usenet. Did you read the first sentence? When matters are taken into real life, why is it so unreasonable to respond in real life? Miguel has merely written on usenet what he would like to do in real life in response to what someone has done to him in real life. This whole "it's only words on a screen" is hogwash because it neglects any context. It's not such a black and white issue. An appropriate response depends on what those words are, and whose screen on which they appear. For example, what if those words happen to contain numbers as well, such as a SSN and credit card information, and those words appear on the screen of identity thieves? Have a read on this identify theft victims story and then tell me that Miguel or any other kook on your list deserves a similar fate? What if the "words on a screen" are a complete fabrication and appear the the screen of your employer, or if you're self employeed, potential customers. Words on a screen can have real life impact, and to categorically label someone as a kook because he/she writes on usenet what he would like to do in real life, is absurd. IMHO, the fact that Miguel has been busting the balls and trolling kookologist with great succes is the only reason that he's been nominated for one of your infantile awards. John, as usual, I agree with your analysis completely. Unfortunately, the sick freaks who populate AUK probably aren't going to credit the word of a usenet newbie such as you. Miguel |
Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION-- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Crash Street Kidd wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology, wrote: Rhonda Lea Kirk said: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology, wrote: miguel said: Dumbarse Git wrote: miguel: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you admit to in another thread), yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said award. If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping yourself. Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice. The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your behalf? It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. I didn't mention your full name or your occupation (let alone your work location), you filthy kook. You have serious reading comprehension problems. I've explained my position on this very well, and I maintain that position. I merely cited an example to make a point. You, being the kooky bully you are, saw a threat in it and decided you were going to do the same thing, only turn it up a notch. That's what narcissistic kooks do. The more you write, the kookier you seem. You're so bent on your kooky mission that you're willing to drag Rhonda through hell for it. Say what you want, and have Rhonda try to defend you, but kooky is as kooky does. This post is just another example. He's not responsible for my choices. His transparent manipulation of you aside... In the mind of Kimberly K. Barnard, Ph.D, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology, treating somebody with some empathy, and not being defensive when they are critical of you, is transparent manipulation. What kind of a sick mother****er are you, Kimberly K. Barnard? He was a friend to me when I was being batted around like a cat toy, and auk was giving out an undeserved Salinger for a troll that did me a lot of emotional damage. He has not withdrawn his friendship even though I was quite critical of him with regard to his initial flaming of you. Everything he has done with regard to /me/ has been done to my benefit and advantage. If that's manipulation, I want more of it. Some of these people need to grow up. Miguel does behave badly on occasion but you need to look the "threats" and flaming in context. If you are going to go after uninvolved family members, then you can expect that people will bear animosity toward the author of those tactics as Miguel does towards Steve. Those of you whining about miguel's tactics of outing your real names need to stop doing it to him. From here it looks like all the unholy howling is hypocritical. I have been on the receiving and sending end of justified and unjustified attacks by and on Miguel in the past but I got over it. You should get over it too. I respect him now. HTH. Thanks. Most of them are flaming hypocrites, but are so immersed in their sociopathic culture that they can't even see it. There are a few who are plainly stupid, so they get a pass for hypocrisy for that reason. miguel |
Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
miguel wrote:
In th Shuttup, Cranston. -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco "To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert |
Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:07:50 -0600, Art Deco sat in thee Comfee Chaire,
and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea: miguel wrote: In th Shuttup, Cranston. Shuttup, Cranston. -- __________________________________________________ ______________________ Hail Eris! Demon Prince of Absurdity; COOSN-029-06-71069 "Lola Stonewall Riot" is not part of my email addy. Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/ AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007 Message-ID: 1 WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, January 2007 MID: 70 "Hey Theophan, I need your help again. Will you please come assist me again? aggreen is after me again. He has been after me for a year and counting now. I want you to destroy his character for me. I can't do it." -- Olympiada: Not too proud to beg for help when it comes to character assassination, and Mistress of the Bleeding Obvious. MID: "I think we have taken care of the net.KKKopping in alt.gothic. Could all the kookologists trim alt.gothic from their headers and leave us alone now? It has gone on long enough. I can take care of myself in there from here on out. Thanks. I know how to fight off trolls now. Thank you for the education." -- Olympiada thinks she's had an education, and that means it's time for those nice kookologists to go away and leave her sandbox alone now, in MID: "Who booby-traps a dead end? That's just not right." -- Cordelia Are you the Peter J Ross that I've heard so much about? Probably. I'm the one who doesn't resort to forgery after losing an argument. "You're the one with the extensive brain damage... okay I see. You're gonna be easily to own them." -- PorchMonkey4Life: Not aware of too many things. MID: bf7xh.834$hH2.64@trnddc02 At last! See Joxer The Mity Monkey on camera! Watch him freak out!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_WuaENGqz0 "And no, I did not have sex with my son. But if I did I certainly wouldn't tell you. Something so beautiful and precious should be kept private." -- Kathy L. Mosesian, or possibly not really her, confesses she may be a liar and committer of incest with her own son, in MID: emailer.net The reporter asked Colin Powell (or George Bush), "What proof do you have that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction?" He replied, "We kept the receipts." -- Bill Hicks Looney Maroon nominee for August 2006 Johnny D Wentzky foamed: "You never asked someone who goes into areas of the internet that are only for adults who has an underage id somehow or another if they are a cop posing as an underage person online? I guess lots of people just don't watch dateline or read stories much. Why don;t you go to pervertedjustice,com and see what they do. They are awash in their self-proclaimed glory after they lied to membners of the public. They are awash in their self-proclaimed glory after they posed as an underage person and agreed to do all sorts of sex acts wioth adult males, and they are adults posing as teenager themselves. They make themsleves into liars by falsely impersonating underage persons and by not fuilfilling the words they tell the victims online in their chats. Why don't you read it where they tell these victims of their deceit about how they have been with grown men and such? Why don't you read it where they say, "That would be cool." after someone makes an advance towards an adult who is posing as a teenager? And, where they agree to meet the person, etc. Lost control, didn't you? Is that why you feel as if you need to lie so much now? I see where lots of these false impersonation games are not sticking. They feel as if they can lie and then order the victims to get counseling in the gayblade, governmental, pro-choice tax leech counseling centers. They are doing nothing more than usury and fraud in many cases." -- Wentzky almost comes out of the closet as a pedo/ephebophile in MID: |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 {NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
Teh Czar ov Awl Teh ****stains wrote:
miguel: The Original Demon Prince of ****stain wrote: miguel: You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken matters to RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of the extent to which his raging insanity has caused him to make unspeakably nasty claims about my children and my grandchild. BTW, all of that **** from Steve was foam, and you ought to have just totted up your Usenet Valhalla points. Instead, you went to K00k Valhalla along with Steve. Since you are unaware of all that Steve wrote, your opinion about this is as useless as your employment prospects, gimp. So? I'm not aware of everything you've written, either, but I still think you're a k00k, just like Chaney. You seem incapable of carrying a train of thought beyond more than a post or two. Is that the disability that keeps you on welfare in Canada, or is it something else? miguel |
.``
`.
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com