Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
* Milton Waddams wrote, On 3/13/2007 11:34 AM:
With everyone going on about Roman, Phoenician and Egyptian sailors one would think they invented sailing. The greatest sailors were the Polynesians. They had the fastest boats and ranged over the greatest area of sea. They were also the best navigators, all without compass, astrolabs and telescopes. The Mediterranean is just a big lake and so are the "seas" in the Arabic countries.The Egyptians did make it to Australia, the credit is due. But the Polynesians were #1 and I'd say the Chinese #2. I certainly wouldn't argue with the nomination of the Polynesians as #1. But, you should also give credit to the Norse, as well as their predecessors (some call them the Albans) who sailed the North Seas to Iceland, Greenland, and Newfoundland, originally in hide covered boats. Up there, of course, a compass wasn't much good. And also the Basque were probably fishing off New England a hundred years before Columbus. |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
* Milton Waddams wrote
With everyone going on about Roman, Phoenician and Egyptian sailors one would think they invented sailing. The greatest sailors were the Polynesians. They had the fastest boats and ranged over the greatest area of sea. They were also the best navigators, all without compass, astrolabs and telescopes. Uh huh. So, if they were such great sailors then why did they not continue to make progress with their vessels and open trade routes to the other civilizations on the continents? Jeff wrote: I certainly wouldn't argue with the nomination of the Polynesians as #1. I would. They made some great voyages, true. But how many of their navigators got lost at sea? About half, maybe more? All we know is that a couple of great canoes did make successful voyages across long stretches of the Pacific. I would suggest that for every one that made it, there was at least one other that didn't. And they did not continue to progress toward longer & more successful voyages. They made some migrations among the islands and called it a day. OTOH with all the beautiful Polynesian women on the island why would a sane man leave home to go voyaging anyway? ..... But, you should also give credit to the Norse, as well as their predecessors (some call them the Albans) who sailed the North Seas to Iceland, Greenland, and Newfoundland, originally in hide covered boats. Up there, of course, a compass wasn't much good. They also covered a good part of the Cathay trade route via the Russian rivers. That's how they came to the attention of the Byzantine Emperor who recruited Vikings for his personal bodyguard. And also the Basque were probably fishing off New England a hundred years before Columbus. Yep. Getting back to the Phoenicians & Romans, how about Hanno's circumnavigation of Africa? Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff" wrote in message . .. * wrote, On 3/14/2007 10:07 AM: big snip I suppose I'll have to read up on Hanno and his predecessors, its been a while. But working your way down a coastline is just a bit easier than striking out across a few thousand miles of open water. You should know. You sail a catamaran, don't you? When (not if) a catamaran capsizes it is healthier for the entire crew if it's within sight of land when it happens. Wilbur Hubbard |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
* Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 3/14/2007 12:02 PM:
"Jeff" wrote in message . .. * wrote, On 3/14/2007 10:07 AM: big snip I suppose I'll have to read up on Hanno and his predecessors, its been a while. But working your way down a coastline is just a bit easier than striking out across a few thousand miles of open water. You should know. You sail a catamaran, don't you? When (not if) a catamaran capsizes it is healthier for the entire crew if it's within sight of land when it happens. Your double digit IQ is showing again Neal. It was catamarans the Polynesians were using to cross vast distances of open water, while the Europeans were hugging the coast in monohulls. So when are you going to tell us how you lost your boat Neal? You must have screwed up pretty badly, given that it had positive flotation. |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jeff" wrote in message
... * Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 3/14/2007 12:02 PM: "Jeff" wrote in message . .. * wrote, On 3/14/2007 10:07 AM: big snip I suppose I'll have to read up on Hanno and his predecessors, its been a while. But working your way down a coastline is just a bit easier than striking out across a few thousand miles of open water. You should know. You sail a catamaran, don't you? When (not if) a catamaran capsizes it is healthier for the entire crew if it's within sight of land when it happens. Your double digit IQ is showing again Neal. It was catamarans the Polynesians were using to cross vast distances of open water, while the Europeans were hugging the coast in monohulls. So when are you going to tell us how you lost your boat Neal? You must have screwed up pretty badly, given that it had positive flotation. They probably repo'd it. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
* Maxprop wrote, On 3/14/2007 7:44 PM:
"Jeff" wrote in message . .. * wrote, On 3/14/2007 10:07 AM: * Milton Waddams wrote With everyone going on about Roman, Phoenician and Egyptian sailors one would think they invented sailing. The greatest sailors were the Polynesians. They had the fastest boats and ranged over the greatest area of sea. They were also the best navigators, all without compass, astrolabs and telescopes. Uh huh. So, if they were such great sailors then why did they not continue to make progress with their vessels and open trade routes to the other civilizations on the continents? Maybe they weren't interested in trade? It really wasn't a strong part of their culture. Oh, but they were very interested in trade. They welcomed foreign vessels and coveted the goods those vessels brought. They traded whatever they had for items from the civilized world, such as breadfruit plants. (Recall that story?) They probably never instituted trade routes because they didn't have the vessels necessary to carry large quantities of goods. They were interested in the trinkets that Europeans had to offer, especially since they had virtually no metal. But there was very little Hawaii had to offer Tahiti, or vice versa. The Europeans knew that the Far East had many treasures to offer, so they had a whole culture based on trade. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Polynesian Sailors and Boats | ASA | |||
I'm ba aaaack! | ASA | |||
Fiberglass loss of strength | Cruising | |||
Americans Sailors First to the Resue+ | ASA | |||
Sailors who love their boats? | ASA |