Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
What are you going to do?
100' Rogue Waves
Experts Baffled by Giant Walls Of Water Surfersvillage Global Surf News: - - Rogue waves are the stuff of legend and maritime myth: Giant waves, taller than highrise buildings, that rise out of calm seas. For years scientists and marine experts have dismissed such stories as superstition. Walls of water do not rise out of the blue, they said. But now research has revealed that 'killer waves' do exist and regularly devastate ships around the world. They defy all scientific understanding and no craft is capable of withstanding their impact. Rogue waves in the past have been ignored and regarded as rare events, now we are finally getting a handle on them and finding out how common they are. These mammoth events are not tidal waves or tsunamis, however. Nor are they caused by earthquakes or landslides. They are single, massive walls of water that rise up - for no known reason - and destroy dozens of ships and oil rigs every year. The story of the super-tanker Munchen is a classic example. She was one of the biggest ships ever built - the length of two-and-a-half football pitches - and unsinkable, it was claimed. But on 7 December, 1978, the pride of the German merchant navy, en route to America, disappeared off the face of the earth. All that was found of the Munchen and her 26 crew was a lifeboat that had suffered an incredible battering. Something extraordinary had destroyed the ship, concluded an official inquiry, which dismissed the Munchen's sinking as a highly unusual event that had no implications for other forms of shipping. Now scientists believe this calm assurance may be dangerously misguided. The destruction of the Munchen was anything but uncommon. Ships are going down all the time. If you read the maritime press there is a boat going down at least once a month, with the loss of crew usually measured in dozens of lives. In the past, bad maintenance or poor seamanship were blamed. Now scientists suspect the truth may be more bizarre. It is known that the Queen Mary was hit by a 75ft wall of water while carrying 15,000 troops in December 1942. The ship came within an ace of capsizing. Only a few years ago the British superliner Oriana was struck by a 70ft wave that smashed windows and sent water cascading through the ship, swamping six of its 10 decks. These giant waves cannot be predicted by standard meteorology. Waves - even in the worst of storms - should not reach much more than 40ft. The fact that walls of water up to 100ft are being observed regularly suggests that something is worryingly wrong with meteorology theory. Waves are normally caused by high winds whipping over the sea surface, but the origin of the freak waves baffles scientists. One theory suggests that waves and winds heading straight into powerful ocean currents may cause these huge walls of water to rise up out of the deep. Another suggests that, under certain conditions, waves can become unstable and start to suck in energy from neighbouring waves and so grow massively and rapidly. Researchers are still arguing over these ideas, but what is indisputable is the fact that the design of modern ships is inadequate for dealing with the freak waves. |
#2
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
What are you going to do?
"Joe" wrote 100' Rogue Waves Even worse.... http://www.livescience.com/forcesofn...t_tsunami.html http://www.livescience.com/php/video...AncientTsunami Cheers, Ellen |
#3
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
What are you going to do?
|
#4
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
What are you going to do?
OzOne wrote: On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:51:10 -0500, "Ellen MacArthur" scribbled thusly: "Joe" wrote 100' Rogue Waves Even worse.... http://www.livescience.com/forcesofn...t_tsunami.html http://www.livescience.com/php/video...AncientTsunami Cheers, Ellen Just go to sea. Tsunami isn't a problem in deep water....the Indonesian one was waves at sea less that 2 metres high...then it reached land...... Oz1...of the 3 twins. That will work on a Tsunami but not a rogue. Could your boat pop out the other side or take a washing machine ride, a tumble in a 120 footer and still float? Joe I welcome you to crackerbox palace, We've been expecting you. |
#5
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
What are you going to do?
OzOne wrote: On 10 Dec 2006 17:02:30 -0800, "Joe" scribbled thusly: OzOne wrote: On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:51:10 -0500, "Ellen MacArthur" scribbled thusly: "Joe" wrote 100' Rogue Waves Even worse.... http://www.livescience.com/forcesofn...t_tsunami.html http://www.livescience.com/php/video...AncientTsunami Cheers, Ellen Just go to sea. Tsunami isn't a problem in deep water....the Indonesian one was waves at sea less that 2 metres high...then it reached land...... Oz1...of the 3 twins. That will work on a Tsunami but not a rogue. Yeah,,,the reference was to a huge Tsunami.....see above Thats why I said yeah, that will work, then asked a question about the original thread. I'll go first. I worry about my engine room hatch and cabin doors caving in.. in a thumble. I would hope to punch thru, and not roll or tumble, or pitch pole.... I dont think a big cat would have a chance of punching thru. My big wave tactic would be to motor sail straight into it full throttle, once the boat went vertical it would be a bad day/night. Joe Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace, We've been expecting you. |
#6
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
What are you going to do?
"Joe" wrote I worry about my engine room hatch and cabin doors caving in.. in a thumble. I would hope to punch thru, and not roll or tumble, or pitch pole.... I dont think a big cat would have a chance of punching thru. My big wave tactic would be to motor sail straight into it full throttle, once the boat went vertical it would be a bad day/night. Are you crazy, Joe? That'd never work. Did you see the Perfect Storm movie? Remember what happened when the Andrea Gail tried to do the same thing, It almost got to the top but when it was almost straight up and down it went over backwards. No, not a good plan. This is what you should try. Act like your boat's a big surfboard and do what surfers do. Check out the wave and look for the side that's getting shorter. Turn your boat so it's going towards the small side about forty five degrees to the wave. Then wait till the wave catches up and as you go up it keep steering forty five degrees or so. Pretty soon you'll be going very fast. You'll be surfing along the bottom part to middle part of the wave away from the side where it's big and breaking. The face of the wave will give you the power to surf along. You can adjust your angle to control your speed. You should try to sheet your sails in tight because the apparent wind is going to be forward. If your lucky pretty soon the wave's gonna get smaller and smaller. They're tall but probably not more than a couple of miles wide. If you can keep control you can just ride the wave till it gets small enough to handle. You've seen surfers do it on TV. There's no reason a boat couldn't do it too. Cheers, Ellen |
#7
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
What are you going to do?
Ellen MacArthur wrote: "Joe" wrote I worry about my engine room hatch and cabin doors caving in.. in a thumble. I would hope to punch thru, and not roll or tumble, or pitch pole.... I dont think a big cat would have a chance of punching thru. My big wave tactic would be to motor sail straight into it full throttle, once the boat went vertical it would be a bad day/night. Are you crazy, Joe? That'd never work. Did you see the Perfect Storm movie? Remember what happened when the Andrea Gail tried to do the same thing, It almost got to the top but when it was almost straight up and down it went over backwards. No, not a good plan. This is what you should try. Act like your boat's a big surfboard and do what surfers do. Check out the wave and look for the side that's getting shorter. Turn your boat so it's going towards the small side about forty five degrees to the wave. Then wait till the wave catches up and as you go up it keep steering forty five degrees or so. Pretty soon you'll be going very fast. You'll be surfing along the bottom part to middle part of the wave away from the side where it's big and breaking. The face of the wave will give you the power to surf along. You can adjust your angle to control your speed. You should try to sheet your sails in tight because the apparent wind is going to be forward. If your lucky pretty soon the wave's gonna get smaller and smaller. They're tall but probably not more than a couple of miles wide. If you can keep control you can just ride the wave till it gets small enough to handle. You've seen surfers do it on TV. There's no reason a boat couldn't do it too. good suggestion for a planing hull, bad bad ideal for a non-planning hull, drag would have you pitch poling right away. Joe Cheers, Ellen |
#8
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
What are you going to do?
"Joe" wrote good suggestion for a planing hull, bad bad ideal for a non-planning hull, drag would have you pitch poling right away. I don't think so, Joe. What's planing and what's non-planing? It's only so on a horizontal surface. On tilted water it has no meaning. A sailboat hull can't plane on flat water. There's not enough power in the engine or sails to make it go fast enough. But it can when it's going downhill when the hill's steep enough. Gravity gives you enough power. Your boat would be able to break out of the wave train it makes. The reason is because the front of the bow wave is almost horizontal on a steep hill of water instead of being too steep to get up like it is on horizontal water. What do you think? Cheers, Ellen |
#9
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
What are you going to do?
Ellen MacArthur wrote: "Joe" wrote good suggestion for a planing hull, bad bad ideal for a non-planning hull, drag would have you pitch poling right away. I don't think so, Joe. What's planing and what's non-planing? Planing allows the boat to go faster by using its speed and hull shape to lift the front part of the hull out of the water. The boat travels on top of the water, greatly reducing the hydrodynamic drag on the vessel. The increase in aerodynamic drag is small by comparison, and can be compensated for by the increased power from the sails due to the faster speed of the craft, and by the crew trimming the sails. The term 'planing' refers to a craft which is predominantly supported by hydrodynamic lift, rather than hydrostatic lift (bouyancy). The extent to which a boat is said to be planing is usually derived from the dimensionless 'Froude Number'. The earliest documented planing sailboat was a proa built in 1898 by Commodore Ralph Munroe; it was capable of speeds of more than twice the hull speed. Planing a sailing dinghy was first popularised by Uffa Fox in Britain. In 1928 Uffa Fox introduced planing to the racing world in his International 14 dinghy, the Avenger. It had been designed with a hull shape which permitted planing. He gained 52 first places, two seconds and three third places out of 57 race starts that year. Obviously this performance had an impact: other designers took on his ideas and developed them. Over the years, most dinghies have acquired some ability to plane, and there are now many high-performance dinghies (usually called skiffs, see these examples, or these in [1]), which will plane even in light winds, at all points of sail. How planing works Normally a non-planing, displacement, hull is restricted in its maximum speed by a formula related to its overall length , where HSPD (in knots) is maximum hull speed, and LWL is the hull length in feet at waterline. This speed is maximised when the boat sits between the bow and stern waves, with no intervening self-caused waves along its length. At low speeds, a hydroplaning hull acts as a displacement hull. But, when the speed increases the hull begins acting as a planing hull. However, when the boat begins to plane the formula becomes irrelevant since the boat is climbing its own bow-wave. The bow rises slightly as it starts by mounting its own bow wave. When it reaches the speed where it overtakes the bow wave, the bow resumes its normal attitude. The boat can often be seen to leave its stern-wave some distance behind it. The hull is now planing. Beginning to plane is the aquatic, and less dramatic, equivalent of an aeroplane breaking the sound barrier. The aeroplane at Mach 1 begins to pierce and go beyond its own 'bow wave', i.e. the compressed layers of air on its front surfaces and ahead of it. A hydroplaning hull travels faster and more efficiently than a displacement hull of comparable size due to two factors: less area of the hull is in contact with the water. This reduces the friction on the hull caused by water. the hull is displacing less water from its path. Water is relatively heavy and a displacing hull must displace its own weight of water. The characteristics of a planing hull are that it is narrow at the prow, with a broader beam towards the rear. The shape of the underneath of the rear of a larger, planing, powerboat is often V shaped. To plane, the power to weight ratio must be high; sailing boats need a good sail area and powerboats need a highly powered engine. Note that under some high wind conditions, very light craft (such as windsurfers and kitesurfers) can actually be pulled up onto the surface of the water, or into the air, by the upward lift of the sail alone. Although this certainly reduces water resistance, it is probably better described as flying, rather than hydroplaning. It is also not a sustainable state, as sailing (or kite flying) involves the extraction of energy from the shear force between the wind and the water. If the entire hull leaves the water, the craft will quickly come to rest relative to the wind, and lose its lifting/driving force. How to plane in a sailing boat Planing can happen in a suitably designed boat in moderate to strong winds if the crew do some or all of the following: Sail on a reach or broad reach to begin Slacken the jib Raise the centreboard Increase the speed Keep the hull level, trapeze if necessary Observe the wake until it is smooth and fast Move the crew weight increasingly towards the rear to begin and to sustain planing Sheet in as speed increases, and apparent wind correspondingly moves forward Keep the boat flat and level Bear away to maintain speed as necessary Flick or pump the sails (although there are restrictions on doing this in a race) While planing, keep control of the waves and steer through them, avoiding to increase speed to collide with the wave in front. Also, in dinghies, keep good control of the sail power. A small change in wind direction can easily cause a capsize, watch also out for gybes. Boat control becomes easier as planing begins, but fast reactions are often needed to get there, to keep the speed up and to keep the boat level. Crew balance and trim are vital, as are sail trimming and minimal centreboard It's only so on a horizontal surface. On tilted water it has no meaning. A sailboat hull can't plane on flat water. There's not enough power in the engine or sails to make it go fast enough. But it can when it's going downhill when the hill's steep enough. Gravity gives you enough power. Your boat would be able to break out of the wave train it makes. The reason is because the front of the bow wave is almost horizontal on a steep hill of water instead of being too steep to get up like it is on horizontal water. What do you think? I think before I got 65,000 lbs on plane with a displacement hull I would be in a vertical position racing to stuff the bow deep into the wave leaving to a classic pitchpole like this: http://www.bymnews.com/photos/albums...ormal_Git1.jpg Joe Cheers, Ellen |
#10
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
What are you going to do?
"Joe" wrote http://www.bymnews.com/photos/albums...ormal_Git1.jpg Those trimarans certainly can go fast enough to pitchpole. And you're right it's usually because they go so fast they stuff the bow into the back of a wave. Dame Ellen can have them. But, I don't think a monohull with ballast on the bottom would suffer such a fate. They just don't go so fast even down the face of a wave. They would stay on the wave and never get a chance to hit the next wave in the backside. Also, if your going across the wave at 45 degrees like a surfer you stay in place on the face of the wave even if your going very fast. You'd have to have a boat with good rudder control. But, I think it would be a safer thing to do than trying to go straight up a huge wave. You'd just have to hang in there till the wave wore itself out. A wave that big just can't be that wide for more than a mile or two. What would that be if your surfing along at ten to fifteen knots? About fifteen minutes? Doable. Cheers, Ellen |