Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote in message . .. That certainly carries the ring of truth: "scrambling" a helicopter for an air intercept. Gilligan wrote: There's always a helo ready to go when launch/recovery ops under way. Sure is. Tell me though, what's the platform and what's the loadout for air-to-air mission, ANY current U.S. military rotating-wing unit (much less carrier cert)? AIM-9 air to air missile on: AH-64. http://www.novia.net/~tomcat/AIM-9.html AH-1Z: http://www.bellhelicopter.textron.co.../bellAH-1Z.cfm AH-1W Flying off of the USS Bataan with AIM-9 missiles: http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/supcobra/ The real question: is the heat signature of the drone enough for any missile in the Navy inventory? Probably not. No fighter jet will lock onto that slow moving, small drone. So send a helicopter up with a 30 caliber machine gun and knock it out of the sky. And why would they launch more fighters when they always have a CAP overhead? The CAP flies a 200 mile radius, it's not overhead. It's not just bull****, it's silly. It is silly to try and use million dollar missiles to knock a large toy RC plane out of the sky. The Bismarck was sunk by biplanes because the gun directors on the Bismarck were not calibrated for such slow flying planes. Will history repeat itself? DSK |