![]() |
Shoals!
DSK wrote: Joe wrote: WTF Bart? You never read Life on the Mississippi by Mark Twain? He has the best descriptions you will ever find of how to reconize shallows, snags, silting, deep water, ect. He describes running the mississippi at night like a man remembers how to walk down a hall in his house in the pitch dark. My descriptions of shallows match Samuels descriptions to a tee. You read the surface and notice very subtile differences of how the water is effected by things below the surface. One problem, Joe. Mark was talking about a river, with strong current. Bart was talking about a harbor. No kidding Doug, I'd never figured that out without your help, but the same effect can be seen in a rivers movement and a harbors tide, you may not beleive this but water moves in both harbors and rivers, and shallows effect the surface in very similar ways. River Harbor Note that there are two seperate & different words, because they are seperate & different things. I get back at ya for that one;0) Mark Twain had some comments about this issue, too. Care to share them? Joe DSK |
Shoals!
One problem, Joe. Mark was talking about a river, with
strong current. Bart was talking about a harbor. Joe wrote: No kidding Doug, I'd never figured that out without your help, but the same effect can be seen in a rivers movement and a harbors tide, you may not beleive this but water moves in both harbors and rivers, and shallows effect the surface in very similar ways. I think relatively few harbors have *that* much current, even at the most constricted part of the channel. And the current's effect over a shoal will be masked by wind. I know of one hazard due to current in many East Coast inlets that I don't believe Mark mentioned, and that is current going over a shoal from the channel... ie tending to pull your vessel onto it. In fact, several NC inlets have this effect strongly enough (on some tides) that they have not only pulled boats aground, but also piled up sand over them. It certianly is possible to notice the difference in waves over a shoal but only when the waves are relatively high compared to the water depth. Most harbors will very rarely develop 2' waves which is what it will take to reveal a 6' shoal. Big wakes help, if there happens to be one crossing the shoal in question when you happen to be looking. Reading the waters surface is a good skill but it doesn't take the place of a chart and it sure ain't the same as on Ol Man River IMHO. Mark Twain had some comments about this issue, too. Care to share them? The only one I can remember off the top of my head is: "The difference between the right word, and almost the right word, is the difference between lightning and the lightning bug." -Mark Twain DSK |
Shoals!
The point I was trying to make is that in harbors the wind
pushes the water around. On Long Island Sound you will notice a distinct pattern where the west side of harbors have the most silt. The reason being, the eastern sides are exposed to a longer fetch and this tends to make the east sides deeper. The cause--the prevailing westerlies. "DSK" wrote One problem, Joe. Mark was talking about a river, with strong current. Bart was talking about a harbor. River Harbor Note that there are two seperate & different words, because they are seperate & different things. Mark Twain had some comments about this issue, too. DSK |
Shoals!
Bart wrote: The point I was trying to make is that in harbors the wind pushes the water around. On Long Island Sound you will notice a distinct pattern where the west side of harbors have the most silt. When you say " distinct pattern" do you mean surface conditions like shorter wave lengths, no waves, ect, waves on top of shallows that might have a shorter wave length of differnt pattern than normal, or you may see calm in a shallow vs waves in other areas? The reason being, the eastern sides are exposed to a longer fetch and this tends to make the east sides deeper. The cause--the prevailing westerlies. That makes sence, I bet the wave patterns are distinct and shorter waves lengths. Just wondering. Joe |
Shoals!
Speaking of shoals:
http://www.oceanscience.net/inletson...91006_comp.jpg http://cirp.wes.army.mil/cirp/studies.html http://www.oceanscience.net/inletsonline/ These deal with tidal currents. |
Shoals!
Jeff wrote: Speaking of shoals: http://www.oceanscience.net/inletson...91006_comp.jpg http://cirp.wes.army.mil/cirp/studies.html http://www.oceanscience.net/inletsonline/ These deal with tidal currents. Someone should buy it up, fill it in, get a bridge and build condos. Joe |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com