Give me a break. Try to actually cite facts. At least Clinton went after Bin
Laden. Bush didn't do anything until he had no choice after 9/11. Now, even
Afganistan is spiraling out of control.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Gilligan" wrote in message
. ..

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...

. At least Clinton tried to deal with it.


http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2...2/221552.shtml


His own Secretary of State may give him an "A" for effort, but look at
what really happened.

Clinton did nothing about all those US Embassies that were toppled,
nothing about the first WTC attack, nothing about the Cole.

Historically, the Democrats have really gotten us into big messes. VietNam
is just one example.

I don't think America should take the risk of voting for any Democrat.

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
Give me a break. Try to actually cite facts. At least Clinton went after
Bin Laden. Bush didn't do anything until he had no choice after 9/11. Now,
even Afganistan is spiraling out of control.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/novak/7...ovak02.article

Haiti spiraled out of control for Clinton.

Well, in that case, he's one up on Bush. Afganistan and Iraq are out of
control and many lives have been lost as a result.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Gilligan" wrote in message
. ..

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
Give me a break. Try to actually cite facts. At least Clinton went after
Bin Laden. Bush didn't do anything until he had no choice after 9/11.
Now, even Afganistan is spiraling out of control.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/novak/7...ovak02.article

Haiti spiraled out of control for Clinton.

If Clinton did good by simply trying, shouldn't Bush get credit for trying
in Iraq?

No because he mislead us into thinking it was a war of necessity rather than
a war of choice. Clinton didn't lie about the reasons for the military
action.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Gilligan" wrote in message
. ..
If Clinton did good by simply trying, shouldn't Bush get credit for trying
in Iraq?