Dave wrote:

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:20:29 -0400, Martin Baxter said:

a page, Foley's conduct was wrong, because I viewed homosexual conduct even
between consenting adults as morally wrong.

Certainly doesn't make any sense from an evolutionary viewpoint does it?

I suppose that's the politically correct justification for the
position--that is, measure the morality of conduct based solely on its
effect on others. But I'm of an older school of thought that says some
conduct is right, and some conduct is wrong, without regard to whether that
conduct injures anyone else.

I think you misunderstood me, I was not attempting to justify such
activity.

Cheers
Marty