![]() |
|
Southwest Connecticut Ernesto damage.
Scotty wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 15:14:15 -0400, "Scotty" said: I note that the most recent GOB recommended simply putting an extra line around the jib (near where the sheets attach, now spiral fashion) to protect from unfurling and flogging. At first I was wondering how they got a line to the top. I suppose I could spiral my extra jib halyard around and tie it off. Sounds like a good idea. Sorry Scotty, typo. Should have said "not spiral fashion." Oh, right, that's what I do now. Wouldn't wrapping the spare halyard around work, too. That's just what I do. I wind the reverse of the jib sheets. Off course, its almost as easy to simply drop it. |
Southwest Connecticut Ernesto damage.
"Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 19:09:27 -0400, "Scotty" said: Oh, right, that's what I do now. Wouldn't wrapping the spare halyard around work, too. I should think so. At this point, it's academic for me, as I carry hank-on jibs. Don't despair, Dave, maybe some day you will be able to afford a RF. ;) |
Southwest Connecticut Ernesto damage.
Bart Senior wrote:
I talked to abother friend in Greenwich. He reports the winds were Southeasterly and that a dozen boat went up on the rocks and half a dozen sank at Indian Harbor. All on moorings. Some say the winds were over 60 knots. They were definately over 50 knots with 11 feet of surf according to my friend. It would have to be a pretty strong mooring to take 11 foot waves, no matter the wind force. It's odd that Ernesto kept such strength so far north, usually hurricanes weaken quickly traveling over land. I am glad all your boats & property came out safely. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Southwest Connecticut Ernesto damage.
Considering I saw several boats 5 feet above the high
water mark it seems 11 feet of surf is possible. It would have been worth a trip to the beach just to see it. "DSK" wrote Bart Senior wrote: I talked to abother friend in Greenwich. He reports the winds were Southeasterly and that a dozen boat went up on the rocks and half a dozen sank at Indian Harbor. All on moorings. Some say the winds were over 60 knots. They were definately over 50 knots with 11 feet of surf according to my friend. It would have to be a pretty strong mooring to take 11 foot waves, no matter the wind force. It's odd that Ernesto kept such strength so far north, usually hurricanes weaken quickly traveling over land. I am glad all your boats & property came out safely. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Southwest Connecticut Ernesto damage.
Bart Senior wrote:
Considering I saw several boats 5 feet above the high water mark it seems 11 feet of surf is possible. It would have been worth a trip to the beach just to see it. "DSK" wrote Bart Senior wrote: I talked to abother friend in Greenwich. He reports the winds were Southeasterly and that a dozen boat went up on the rocks and half a dozen sank at Indian Harbor. All on moorings. Some say the winds were over 60 knots. They were definately over 50 knots with 11 feet of surf according to my friend. It would have to be a pretty strong mooring to take 11 foot waves, no matter the wind force. It's odd that Ernesto kept such strength so far north, usually hurricanes weaken quickly traveling over land. I am glad all your boats & property came out safely. Fresh Breezes- Doug King Bart, are you seeing high surf from Florence yet? We're getting 6-8 footers here..the surfers are ecstatic....... |
Southwest Connecticut Ernesto damage.
I was out yesterday and it was the typically flat water
we get here in the Sound. I'm going out tomorrow, but I doubt we'll see anything here as the weather report is cloudy and cooler tomorrow. "katy" wrote Bart, are you seeing high surf from Florence yet? We're getting 6-8 footers here..the surfers are ecstatic....... |
Southwest Connecticut Ernesto damage.
"Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 21:08:31 -0400, "Scotty" said: Don't despair, Dave, maybe some day you will be able to afford a RF. It's on my list. This year it was a new main. Who made it? |
Southwest Connecticut Ernesto damage.
I have a 130 RF, it's not too bad rolled up to 100% or so. I
think a 150% would be worse when partially rolled up. I'll eventually get an Assy for when winds are light. BTW, I just finished making a new 130% RF last night. SBV "Dave" wrote in message ... On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:38:15 -0400, Charlie Morgan said: Smart choice. Clarke Bassett is not only a great sailmaker, but he's a very nice guy. I believe he has patents on his "boxcut" sails. I have a shelf-foot main from him, and I love it. When my 100% jib gets older, I'll be going to him for a reefable 130%. They are made with two different weights. Lighter near the luff, so when you roll it up to use a 100%, you have a much smaller diameter leading edge spoiling things. When the winds are lighter, you roll out the rest, and the lighter weight cloth is plenty strong enough for those conditions. The sail has a good shape in both positions. That's my sense as well. What he said just seemed to make sense. When I get to installing RF I'll probably ask him to do the new Genoa. One thing I'm curious about--why just a 130? When I talked to him his suggestion was that if I was going to do roller reefing (as opposed to just roller furling) I should go with something like 150, which is often needed on the Sound. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:55 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com