I guess not!

If anyone listened to the rollover ratings (they were listed on 1010
wins yesterday) the Kia Sedona had the BEST safety rating for rollover,
beating the Sienna and Honda by a LARGE margin. The Sedona was also
judged the safest minivan ever tested period, and also beat the Honda
and Toyota in roadholding and braking.
I still prefer fit and finish in the Toyota and Honda by a small
margin, but that's all they got.
BTW, Toyota had the best and worst ratings for their pickups on
rollovers. I don't remember the models though.


RB
35s5
NY

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
ups.com...
I guess not!

If anyone listened to the rollover ratings (they were listed on 1010
wins yesterday) the Kia Sedona had the BEST safety rating for rollover,
beating the Sienna and Honda by a LARGE margin. The Sedona was also
judged the safest minivan ever tested period, and also beat the Honda
and Toyota in roadholding and braking.
I still prefer fit and finish in the Toyota and Honda by a small
margin, but that's all they got.
BTW, Toyota had the best and worst ratings for their pickups on
rollovers. I don't remember the models though.


RB
35s5
NY


One can simply judge for themselves what a "large" margin is at:

http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/ncap/RollRa...r=2006#VClassV

There's a 2% difference between the Sienna ans Sedona. Interestingly, the
Sienna is less likely to roll over than a Subaru Forester by the same
"large" margin and doubly less than a SUBARU TRIBECA!

A mini-van has a better roll over rating than a SUBARU TRIBECA! By an
ASTRONOMICAL MARGIN!!! An economy car (Corolla) beats it through the cones!
What, exactly, does the Tribeca do well?

Wasn't RB touting the TRIBECA as the safest car on earth?

Where are the pictures of his 35s5 underway? hmmm?

I examined the EFIX data on the photo of the 35s5 Robert posted.

The picture was taken with a Canon camera, not a Nikon like Robert
owns.



Hey, that's actually funny, Joe! But it's EXIF data and it reads as
follows.....

[Image]
Image Description =
Make = NIKON CORPORATION
Model = NIKON D70
Orientation = top/left
X Resolution = 72
Y Resolution = 72
Resolution Unit = inch
Software = OLYMPUS CAMEDIA Master
Date Time = 2005-10-15 21:51:17
YCbCr Positioning = co-sited
Exif IFD Pointer = Offset: 234

[Camera]
Exposure Time = 1/1000"
F Number = F8
Exposure Program = Aperture priority
Exif Version = 0220
Date Time Original = 2005-10-15 12:18:17
Date Time Digitized = 2005-10-15 12:18:17
Components Configuration = YCbCr
Compressed Bits Per Pixel = 1
Exposure Bias Value = +0.33EV
Max Aperture Value = F3.48
Metering Mode = CenterWeightedAverage
Light Source = Flash
Flash = Off
Focal Length = 28mm
Maker Note = 250 Byte
User Comment =
Flashpix Version = 0100
Color Space = sRGB
Exif Image Width = 950
Exif Image Height = 632
Interoperability IFD Pointer = Offset: 980
File Source = DSC
Scene Type = A directly photographed image

[Interoperability]
Interoperability Index = R98
Interoperability Version = 0100

[Thumbnail]
Compression = JPEG Compressed (Thumbnail)
X Resolution = 72
Y Resolution = 72
Resolution Unit = inch
JPEG Interchange Format = Offset: 2012
JPEG Interchange Format Length = Length: 7165


Sorry, Joe...yet another blunder for you!


RB
35s5
NY

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
I still prefer fit and finish in the Toyota and Honda by a small
margin, but that's all they got.

H-m-m-m-m-m I wonder, was it the imitation wood grain inteior that
caught your attention to begin with?

Woof

Capt. Rob wrote:
I examined the EFIX data on the photo of the 35s5 Robert posted.

The picture was taken with a Canon camera, not a Nikon like Robert
owns.



Hey, that's actually funny, Joe! But it's EXIF data and it reads as
follows.....

[Image]
Image Description =
Make = NIKON CORPORATION
Model = NIKON D70
Orientation = top/left
X Resolution = 72
Y Resolution = 72
Resolution Unit = inch
Software = OLYMPUS CAMEDIA Master
Date Time = 2005-10-15 21:51:17
YCbCr Positioning = co-sited
Exif IFD Pointer = Offset: 234

[Camera]
Exposure Time = 1/1000"
F Number = F8
Exposure Program = Aperture priority
Exif Version = 0220
Date Time Original = 2005-10-15 12:18:17
Date Time Digitized = 2005-10-15 12:18:17
Components Configuration = YCbCr
Compressed Bits Per Pixel = 1
Exposure Bias Value = +0.33EV
Max Aperture Value = F3.48
Metering Mode = CenterWeightedAverage
Light Source = Flash
Flash = Off
Focal Length = 28mm
Maker Note = 250 Byte
User Comment =
Flashpix Version = 0100
Color Space = sRGB
Exif Image Width = 950
Exif Image Height = 632
Interoperability IFD Pointer = Offset: 980
File Source = DSC
Scene Type = A directly photographed image

[Interoperability]
Interoperability Index = R98
Interoperability Version = 0100

[Thumbnail]
Compression = JPEG Compressed (Thumbnail)
X Resolution = 72
Y Resolution = 72
Resolution Unit = inch
JPEG Interchange Format = Offset: 2012
JPEG Interchange Format Length = Length: 7165


Sorry, Joe...yet another blunder for you!


RB
35s5
NY

Post all the lies you want, anyone can run the efix data, your a know
liar, it was a Cannon.
I have rock solid proof.

No pictures sailing... lies all lies!

Capt.Suzy
35s5
Chitty Island
NY

"Mys Terry" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 31 May 2006 16:05:51 -0600, "Bob Crantz"
wrote:


"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
roups.com...
I guess not!

If anyone listened to the rollover ratings (they were listed on 1010
wins yesterday) the Kia Sedona had the BEST safety rating for rollover,
beating the Sienna and Honda by a LARGE margin. The Sedona was also
judged the safest minivan ever tested period, and also beat the Honda
and Toyota in roadholding and braking.
I still prefer fit and finish in the Toyota and Honda by a small
margin, but that's all they got.
BTW, Toyota had the best and worst ratings for their pickups on
rollovers. I don't remember the models though.


RB
35s5
NY


One can simply judge for themselves what a "large" margin is at:

http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/ncap/RollRa...r=2006#VClassV

There's a 2% difference between the Sienna ans Sedona. Interestingly, the
Sienna is less likely to roll over than a Subaru Forester by the same
"large" margin and doubly less than a SUBARU TRIBECA!

A mini-van has a better roll over rating than a SUBARU TRIBECA! By an
ASTRONOMICAL MARGIN!!! An economy car (Corolla) beats it through the
cones!
What, exactly, does the Tribeca do well?

Wasn't RB touting the TRIBECA as the safest car on earth?

Where are the pictures of his 35s5 underway? hmmm?



Did you get the recall notice on your Corrolla yet, Bob? If not, better
duct
tape that steering wheel on! It's a bitch trying to steer by dragging your
feet.

Whoooo Hoooo!


Terry & Skipper, Clearlake Texas

I thought that recall was for only the Prius. My Tundra is recalled due to a
scratch in the ball joint mount.

With both cars recalled I'll have to resort to my Flinstone mobile. You stop
it by dragging your feet.

"Mys Terry" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 31 May 2006 16:05:51 -0600, "Bob Crantz"
wrote:


"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
roups.com...
I guess not!

If anyone listened to the rollover ratings (they were listed on 1010
wins yesterday) the Kia Sedona had the BEST safety rating for rollover,
beating the Sienna and Honda by a LARGE margin. The Sedona was also
judged the safest minivan ever tested period, and also beat the Honda
and Toyota in roadholding and braking.
I still prefer fit and finish in the Toyota and Honda by a small
margin, but that's all they got.
BTW, Toyota had the best and worst ratings for their pickups on
rollovers. I don't remember the models though.


RB
35s5
NY


One can simply judge for themselves what a "large" margin is at:

http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/ncap/RollRa...r=2006#VClassV

There's a 2% difference between the Sienna ans Sedona. Interestingly, the
Sienna is less likely to roll over than a Subaru Forester by the same
"large" margin and doubly less than a SUBARU TRIBECA!

A mini-van has a better roll over rating than a SUBARU TRIBECA! By an
ASTRONOMICAL MARGIN!!! An economy car (Corolla) beats it through the
cones!
What, exactly, does the Tribeca do well?

Wasn't RB touting the TRIBECA as the safest car on earth?

Where are the pictures of his 35s5 underway? hmmm?



Did you get the recall notice on your Corrolla yet, Bob? If not, better
duct
tape that steering wheel on! It's a bitch trying to steer by dragging your
feet.

Whoooo Hoooo!


Terry & Skipper, Clearlake Texas

Do you have a link/source for that recall?

"silverback" wrote in message
news:aaqfg.5171$S61.4036@edtnps90...

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
I still prefer fit and finish in the Toyota and Honda by
a small
margin, but that's all they got.

H-m-m-m-m-m I wonder, was it the imitation wood grain
inteior that
caught your attention to begin with?


That was his boat.

"silverback" wrote:

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
I still prefer fit and finish in the Toyota and Honda by a small
margin, but that's all they got.

H-m-m-m-m-m I wonder, was it the imitation wood grain inteior that
caught your attention to begin with?

Woof

What catches a Halifax baby seal?

Such a Capt. Mooron reply... MEOW

LP snicker