http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...cy/q0265.shtml

Proof poitive the airliner engines were found at the pentagon.

Pictures, engineering diagrams and information that even a 5 year old
can understand.

(this may be over Mys terry aka Roberts head)

Joe

Well, I'd rather be a skeptic than a bonehead. I would not call it proof
positive. It good though.

Thanks for the link.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Joe" wrote in message
ups.com...
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...cy/q0265.shtml

Proof poitive the airliner engines were found at the pentagon.

Pictures, engineering diagrams and information that even a 5 year old
can understand.

(this may be over Mys terry aka Roberts head)

Joe

Good Lord Jon, even the screw holes match(exactly) the boeing repair
book, no other engine has that screw pattern on the fuel injector port
covers NONE!. 3 big chunks of engine all positively ID as the engine
type on the airliner.

Lets see your evidence it's a drone or missile. I'll hold my breath.

Capt. Suzy
35s5
NY

Joe's link makes you look pretty FN stupid Robert.
Specialy the Boeing CEO bull**** you pulled out your ass.

When will you ever learn that idiots like M. Moore and the chump change
director are just out to take money from brain dead retards like you?

If you and Jon keep standing up as the face of the Democrat or liberal
partys the Republicans have nothing to worry about!

Capt. Suzzanne Brody & Lil Thomas
Heart Of Gold
35s5
NY

Sorry, Rolls Royce CEO stated that the ROTOR disc is not even from one
of their engines at all. Even the site is aware of this saying that
that "the closest match" is a Rolls rotor. Even taking the damage
factor into account it's STILL NOT A MATCH for the Rolls rotor. Simply
look at the relative sizes of the inner hub for proof.
I'm inclined to believe Rolls Royce in that they know their engines
pretty well. This is not a game where "close match" wins. It's either a
757 engine or it's not.

RB
35s5
NY

the screw holes match(exactly) the the screw pattern on the fuel
injector port
covers on the RR engine. No other jet engine has that port pattern or
screw pattern NONE!.

3 big chunks of engine all positively ID as the Rolls Royce engine
type on the airliner.

First you said Boeing, Now you say Rolls Royce CEO, your ass must be
cavernious...you keep pulling so much BS out of it.

Capt. Suzy
35s5
NY

"SUZY" wrote in message
ps.com...
the screw holes match(exactly) the the screw pattern on the fuel
injector port
covers on the RR engine. No other jet engine has that port pattern or
screw pattern NONE!.

3 big chunks of engine all positively ID as the Rolls Royce engine
type on the airliner.

First you said Boeing, Now you say Rolls Royce CEO, your ass must be
cavernious...you keep pulling so much BS out of it.

Bubbles: -9

First you said Boeing, Now you say Rolls Royce CEO, your ass must be
cavernious...you keep pulling so much BS out of it.



I guess you never watched the link I sent that has quotes from both
Boeing and Rolls saying they questioned the engine origin after seeing
photos. But they don't know as much about planes as you, Joe, right??

RB
35s5
NY

Notice how poor Joe can't even respond to the basic error of his
website....a CLOSE MATCH doesn't make it a 757 engine. The rotor isn't
even a close match fer cripes sake.


RB
35s5
NY

Thats OK Robert, Joe said it would be WAY to far over your head for you
to understand....and he was right again.

The guys physic!

Capt. Suzy
35s5
NY