"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
ps.com...
also means Maxi thinks Bush is a "good" president, something most
republicans now realize is not true.

As usual you're completely wrong.


Oh really? Can you show us ANY poll showing Bush approval rating that
could, in ANY way hint that republicans are happy with Bush?

About half the GOP still likes the guy, for whatever reason I can't fathom.
And about half aren't pleased with him. That isn't "most."

You're also wrong about my opinion of Bush.

In other words: wrong on all counts.

Max

"Binary Bill" wrote in message
ups.com...
The CIA reported finding many Whitworth fasteners strewn about the
wreckage. The FBI concluded that it was a BSA 440 that rocketed into
the Pentagon.

LOL.

Max

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
ups.com...
Yesterday we saw films of the plane hitting the Pentagon, and it
clearly looks like an airliner.


What???? It doesn't look like anything. It's very small. No one
anywhere (except you!) said it looks like anything but a small white
blur. Meanwhile the damage and wreckage are not consistant with a crash
of this type and that's according to a LOT of experts and pilots. Maxi,
if you do some real research you'll see that quite a few people (with
far greater understanding of jet crashes) have some very serious doubts
about the Pentagon hit. This has nothing to do with laying blame since
we can't even be sure of exactly what happened. But it seems rather
doubtful to anyone with eyes that a 757 hit the pentagon. Where is the
757? Where are the passengers? All good questions. But that doesn't
make the doubts into nonsense. Most witnesses saw NO 757 hit the
Pentagon, describing a missile or small plane instead. The damage to
the Pentagon makes no sense at all, since it's impact point is much
smaller than a 757. The lack of wreckage is also a factor, some of
which did not match the 757 according to Rolls and Boeing.

So what happened to the fourth airliner--the one that was tracked by ATC all
the way to Washington whereupon it disappeared from radar?

Max

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
ups.com...

What???? It doesn't look like anything. It's very small. No one
anywhere (except you!) said it looks like anything but a small white
blur.
snip
Most witnesses saw NO 757 hit the
Pentagon, describing a missile or small plane instead.

Easily explained. While watching a spot on the track at the last Indy 500 I
attended--about 20 years ago--I was impressed with the fact that when cars
entered and exited my field of view, I could not discern any features of the
vehicle other than a very brief, colorful blur. Those cars were doing
around 225mph at that point.

Now take an airliner, seen from a distance which might make it appear about
the same size relative to the observer as the cars I watched, but increase
the speed to double that number: 550mph. It's not possible to see the
airliner beyond a similar, if faster, blur if one is gazing straight ahead.
Eyewitnesses, unless they watched the airliner descend from the sky and
proceed into the building, would not be able to discern what they'd just
seen.

Max

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
I'm not so anti Bush as you think. I think he's a stupid person with no
real sense of right and wrong. That said, I like his position on
immigration.

I don't.

It's not totally clear what hit the Pentagon. I would still like to see
some questions answered, questions that are being ignored.

The overriding question I'd like the skeptics to answer is: what happened
to the fourth airliner that descended into Washington and disappeared from
the radar screens and ceased to exist? There is only one possible answer:
it collided with the Pentagon.

Max

The overriding question I'd like the skeptics to answer is: what
happened
to the fourth airliner that descended into Washington and disappeared
from
the radar screens and ceased to exist? There is only one possible
answer:
it collided with the Pentagon.


Is that the only possible answer? I can think of many, some improbable,
but no less so than what was reported.

RB
35s5
NY

"Mys Terry" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 18 May 2006 22:22:18 GMT, "Maxprop" wrote:


"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
oups.com...
also means Maxi thinks Bush is a "good" president, something most
republicans now realize is not true.

As usual you're completely wrong.


Oh really? Can you show us ANY poll showing Bush approval rating that
could, in ANY way hint that republicans are happy with Bush?

About half the GOP still likes the guy, for whatever reason I can't
fathom.

Cites, please.

Bush's approval rating fell from 38 to 35% in the last poll, following his
immigration speech. Statistically conservatives comprise about 42% of the
general voting-age population of this country. If 35% of the people polled
still approve of the guy, and that poll is representative of the general
population, it could logically be reasoned that more than half the
republicans (or at least conservatives) still like him. It's a sure bet
that democrats or liberals don't like him, and it's my suspicion that very
few middle-of-the-road types like him either.

Max

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
oups.com...
The overriding question I'd like the skeptics to answer is: what
happened
to the fourth airliner that descended into Washington and disappeared
from
the radar screens and ceased to exist? There is only one possible
answer:
it collided with the Pentagon.


Is that the only possible answer? I can think of many, some improbable,
but no less so than what was reported.

*Most* improbable, I think. But for the record, let's hear a few.

Max

, it could logically be reasoned that more than half the
republicans (or at least conservatives) still like him.


100% since 20% of such polls are commonly comprised of votes that are
party based. That means that Bush gets quite a few positive votes from
people who don't like him as president. They just vote the party.
Bush may end up as one of the worst presidents in history and I'm not a
democrat by the way. Shame on anyone who was dumb enough to vote for
Bush twice...or even once.


RB
35s5
NY

I heard the poll numbers were in the low 30s... 32, 33. Worst in 25 years.
Bad news for the US, since it's even worse overseas.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Mys Terry" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 18 May 2006 22:22:18 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote:


"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
roups.com...
also means Maxi thinks Bush is a "good" president, something most
republicans now realize is not true.

As usual you're completely wrong.


Oh really? Can you show us ANY poll showing Bush approval rating that
could, in ANY way hint that republicans are happy with Bush?

About half the GOP still likes the guy, for whatever reason I can't
fathom.

Cites, please.

Bush's approval rating fell from 38 to 35% in the last poll, following his
immigration speech. Statistically conservatives comprise about 42% of the
general voting-age population of this country. If 35% of the people
polled still approve of the guy, and that poll is representative of the
general population, it could logically be reasoned that more than half the
republicans (or at least conservatives) still like him. It's a sure bet
that democrats or liberals don't like him, and it's my suspicion that very
few middle-of-the-road types like him either.

Max