| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#18
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Testing Anchors
Thanks for the detail!
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Alan Gomes" wrote in message ... "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... In article , Alan Gomes wrote: I use an FX-23 with my Catalina 30, and it has held very well under real world conditions. (I anchor mostly at Catalina Island and the northern channel islands.) My anchoring is in mud and sand bottoms. I've not dragged with it yet, but I am careful to let out plenty of scope and then set it well with the engine in reverse. It's a fine anchor that provides more surface area for a given weight while maintaining the necessary strength. Like any Danforth-style anchor it may not be the anchor of choice while on a single hook in conditions prone to large shifts in current, but I'd have to say that even in those conditions my own personal experience has been good with it resetting itself. Of course, an FX-23 is larger than the "recommended" size for my boat, but it only weighs 15 pounds or so, which is plenty easy to handle. Just my 2-cents based on my use in real-world conditions. How do you like the Catalina? Any problems? We're considering adding one to our fleet. -- Capt. JG @@ www.sailnow.com Jon, I do like the Catalina 30. It's a decent boat. There are some definite plusses and minuses to the design, but at this point all of the common flaws are well documented and in many instances have been addressed by the factory in the more recent boats. www.catalina30.com has quite a bit of information on the boat, including what upgrades and fixes are recommended. I have a 1987 MK-II, which is the year they went to a "T" shaped cockpit and changed the exterior design of the cabin somewhat. The interior is mostly the same as the older boats, but they reoriented the nav station to face aft, using the forward end of the quarter berth as the seat. It's fairly useless, actually, so expect to use the main salon table for spreading out your charts if you get this model. I do like the later boats better. One problem with the older boats is that they have plywood underneath the bilge in the keel stub that's encased in glass. When that is compromised the plywood can/will rot and requires removal. The fix is to replace it will solid glass. The repair is messy but not technically that hard. At some point in the late 80's (I don't recall exactly when) Catalina got rid of the plywood and went to all glass. Another thing to check is the wooden block under the compression post. That, too, can be prone to rot and require replacement. Fortunately, it's quite accessible in the forward part of the bilge and so is easy to inspect. Most of the systems are pretty easy to access, particularly the engine. That makes maintenance much simpler than on many boats. Catalina put different engines in the boat at different times, but many of them have the fresh water cooled M25-series by Universal (Kubota). These are great engines. The raw water cooled Universal 5411 used in some of the earlier boats is significantly underpowered, and being raw water cooled is not a good candidate for rebuilding. Try to find one with an M25XP and you'll be happy. Build quality of the boat (hull, deck, rigging, etc.) is pretty good--not exceptional but "decent." As I said, later models will have certain structural upgrades already incorporated from the factory, such as improved chainplates for the lowers. On older boats it's common for previous owners to have made the mods themselves, and Catalina sells kits for some of these. The boat sails pretty well. It doesn't seem to have any really bad habits that I know of. I have a standard rig (the shorter one), but this works well for where I sail (San Pedro, aka "Hurricane Gulch"). Where you are I think either rig would be just fine. It's a big, fat, moderately heavy boat. It has a lot of initial stability because of the significant beam. It's reasonably well balanced if you sail it right. I'd definitely avoid the models with a wing keel as they won't go to weather worth a darn. From my experience with the boat I'd say that it has a pretty "active" helm; it's not the kind of boat on which you can just lock the wheel and go below for any period of time. It is not as sprightly as the Lapworth designs I've sailed and owned from the same era. I'd say it's a good sailing boat but not exceptional. The interior is positively cavernous, which is the upside to all that beam. It's a very sensible layout and quite comfortable at anchor. I'd give the interior high marks. Hope some of this helps. You might also want to check out the Catalina 30 list on Yahoo, which has many knowledgeable owners participating and is a wealth of info. Take care, Alan Gomes |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Testing 2006 Honda BF15? Necessary? | Cruising | |||
| Cooler testing question for Richard K. | Boat Building | |||
| Cooler testing question for Richard K. | Cruising | |||
| testing | General | |||
| testing | Electronics | |||
Threaded Mode
