Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , OzOne wrote:
On Wed, 10 May 2006 04:05:02 +0100, Peter Wiley scribbled thusly: Dunno. My personal experience with Subarus has been excellent, tho. Never had any probs with any of the 4 I've owned, and they do hold resale value well here in Oz. I have nothing bad to say about Toyotas & Hondas either but can't speak from personal experience. Note that I have no interest in the rev-head toys Bob likes. I like the conservative, slightly overweight, very solid and well engineered sedans. It's nice to have a car whose image is the opposite of the driver's :-) PDW Subarus are known to have a small but expensive problem with cylinder head gaskets leaking coolant, rapid wear in the valvetrain, and gearboxes/clutches that may not be as hardy as they might be. The turbo ones, I can well believe it. I'd never buy a used turbo Subie. The clutch on my Liberty was replaced at 160K, the CV joints at 180K. That's it, and while I bought it used, it has the full logbook dealer service records. Still, they are a great car and worth the risk afa I'm concerned. As I said, my personal experience with them is good. In fact I was considering buying another one for my daughter. PDW |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Wiley" wrote in message . .. The clutch on my Liberty was replaced at 160K, the CV joints at 180K. That's it, and while I bought it used, it has the full logbook dealer service records. That's pretty good for a Jeep Liberty, which overall has had a rather dismal reliability rating. But each car is an individual, and some folks get lucky. I'd say you were fortunate. A neighbor finally sold his after only 15K miles and 2 years, during much of which the vehicle was in the shop awaiting parts. As I said, my personal experience with them is good. In fact I was considering buying another one for my daughter. Road & Track's long-term tests of Subarus has pointed to a number of service issues on most of the models. And Consumer Reports also noted some issues as well. But overall they are stout, relatively reliable vehicles. That the company has doggedly retained it boxer engines is a bit surprising, considering the problems that are inherent with boxers, but I suspect their loyal clientele might revolt if they began putting inline 4s and V6s in them. Max |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article et,
Maxprop wrote: "Peter Wiley" wrote in message . .. The clutch on my Liberty was replaced at 160K, the CV joints at 180K. That's it, and while I bought it used, it has the full logbook dealer service records. That's pretty good for a Jeep Liberty, which overall has had a rather dismal reliability rating. Subaru Liberty. Sold in the USA as a Legacy IIRC. Wouldn't have a Jeep except as a gift. Useless excuse for a 4WD compared to a Toyota, Nissan, Mitsubishi or almost anything except maybe a Lada. PDW |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Wiley" wrote in message . .. In article et, Maxprop wrote: "Peter Wiley" wrote in message . .. The clutch on my Liberty was replaced at 160K, the CV joints at 180K. That's it, and while I bought it used, it has the full logbook dealer service records. That's pretty good for a Jeep Liberty, which overall has had a rather dismal reliability rating. Subaru Liberty. Sold in the USA as a Legacy IIRC. Wouldn't have a Jeep except as a gift. Useless excuse for a 4WD compared to a Toyota, Nissan, Mitsubishi or almost anything except maybe a Lada. I stand corrected. Never heard the term "Liberty" applied to a Subaru, but you've explained that. I agree--the last Jeep I owned was a 1964 CJ-5 with no top. It was perfect for the fire roads in the Colorado Rockies where I lived in the mid-1970s. Max |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|