Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Dave
wrote: On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:46:16 -0600, "Bob Crantz" said: B attempts to trivialize A. C supports A. If B is true then A and C are false. Sorry, Bob it ain't worth effort to try and parse that. Wasn't that difficult but then I had to learn predicate logic, not chop-logic as is mandatory in law school. PDW |
#32
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave" wrote in message ... On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:02:35 -0400, DSK said: Bob Crantz wrote: hehehehe!!! The troop withdrawal was an error on the part of the WSJ. They retracted it today. Jumped a little too fast to defend Rummy for something he didn't do, eh? But you just *know* that WSJ op-ed article was totally 'fair & balanced' as well as 100% accurate, right? Sometimes I think Dave is working to be President Bush's next pick for the Supreme Court. Hmm. I'm puzzled. I have no idea what troop withdrawal he's talking about. Nor do I find a retraction of anything in today's Journal, which I have in front of me. The only correction they published today has to do with an error in a review of a book entitled "Why People Die by Suicide" which appeared on April 15. So what troop withdrawal is he talking about, and where does this supposed retraction appear in the paper? You supplied the numbers and date on the troop reduction for the Marine Corps. Where did you get the data from? Rumsfeld never talked about a troop withdrawal. But you defended him on it. It's obvious you have no idea what he is talking about. |
#33
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sometimes I think Dave is working to be President Bush's next pick for the
Supreme Court. Bob Crantz wrote: He's a Bushbot. He took it hook, line and sinker to defend Rummy even though Rummy did nothing wrong. That's the problem with the Bushbots. There's no critical thinking, criticism is not acceptable and they destroy the critics - even if they are loyal Republicans. Heck, they even went after AARP for not ballyhooing their plan to loot Social Security. ... Bush and his minions has done more to destroy the Republican party(and America) than anyone else. This explains it so perfectly, it's scary: http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=19635 DSK |
#34
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Republican Spin:
"Of three thousand retired generals only a half dozen have been critical of the handling of Iraq by Rumsfeld" Three thousand generals: Over one thousand in medical, supply and support who can offer no valid opinion. Fifteen hundred working for defense contractors, if they spoke up they'd lose government business. Their business is continuing the war. Five hundred on life support. That doesn't leave too many left. Funny, though, that the ones who did criticize operated in theater with very recent commands. Yet their word is negated by the absence of speech from hundreds of retired supply clerks and generals on respirators. With that kind of logic one could not prove the sky is blue because the occupants of a cemetery can't confirm it! The Republican spin is getting desperate. Medicare prescription program costs over twice what the administration said = Bush lied! Compassionate Conservative = Bush lied! Swears, on a Bible, to uphold the Constitution = Bush lied! Spending goes through the roof, Bush claims he is Republican = Bush lied! Operation gridlock full steam ahead! Amen! |
#35
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote in message ... Sometimes I think Dave is working to be President Bush's next pick for the Supreme Court. Bob Crantz wrote: He's a Bushbot. He took it hook, line and sinker to defend Rummy even though Rummy did nothing wrong. That's the problem with the Bushbots. There's no critical thinking, criticism is not acceptable and they destroy the critics - even if they are loyal Republicans. Heck, they even went after AARP for not ballyhooing their plan to loot Social Security. ... Bush and his minions has done more to destroy the Republican party(and America) than anyone else. This explains it so perfectly, it's scary: http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=19635 DSK It's Rumsfeld and the Pentagon that want to reduce the force numbers because of costs and Congress won't have it: http://www.navyleague.org/sea_power/apr06-08.php Remember, this is the free spending Republican Congress and George "what is a veto" Bush. Bush = no vetoes ever = wimp! |