The ANTARCTIC
 

"Mys Terry" wrote
Only because you want to be obtuse. When people talk about "saving the earth"
they are obviously talking about saving it as a habitat for life, rather than
turning it into a lifeless stone.

With all due respect we pitiful humans lack the ability to turn Earth into a
"lifeless stone". Life will persist altho we may not be here.

The ANTARCTIC
 

"Maxprop" wrote

Really? What's your reference for this: the movie The Day After Tomorrow?


Dumb as it sounds that's prolly as good as any )c:

The ANTARCTIC
 

Jon, if human beings are responsible for global warming how do you explain
the presence of oil deposits in Alaska and coal in Spitzbergen and (I
believe) also in Antartica?


"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
You have not presented much in the way of "evidence." Global warming is
happening. Human beings are responsible for much of it.

The ANTARCTIC
 

We haven't gotten to them yet?

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Edgar" wrote in message
...
Jon, if human beings are responsible for global warming how do you
explain
the presence of oil deposits in Alaska and coal in Spitzbergen and (I
believe) also in Antartica?


"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
You have not presented much in the way of "evidence." Global warming is
happening. Human beings are responsible for much of it.

The ANTARCTIC
 

Actually, most of the science is right according to many environmental
scientists. I believe their concern was that it was too "Hollywood" to be
taken seriously. And, obviously many things in the movie are just Hollywood
flash.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Vito" wrote in message
...
"Maxprop" wrote

Really? What's your reference for this: the movie The Day After
Tomorrow?


Dumb as it sounds that's prolly as good as any )c:

The ANTARCTIC
 

"Mys Terry" wrote


You are wrong. There are enough nuclear weapons in
existence to trash
the world several times over. The only survivors will be
cockroaches,
twinkies, and Keith Richards.


Twinkies who live under rocks, like you?

SV

The ANTARCTIC
 

He's act more like a cockroach, yet true..... he is about as sharp as a
twinkie.

Joe

The ANTARCTIC
 

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
Max, instead of trying unsuccessfully to insult me, try typing in
"evidence for global warming" and see what you get. Here's one of 18
million links. Good night and good luck...

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...NGE1BECPI1.DTL

What evidence are you referring to? I see only a report based on talks
given at a meeting of the AAAS. I'd love to see the actual papers upon
which those talks were based, not just some reporter's interpretation of
what he heard. You still haven't provided any references or evidence.

Max

The ANTARCTIC
 

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
Actually, most of the science is right according to many environmental
scientists.

The science is strictly theory, but it *may* be accurate. Or it may not be.
It really makes little difference, because we aren't likely to see anything
of the sort during our lifetimes, or those of our children or their
children.

Max

The ANTARCTIC
 

Nor is it my job to do so. You're a smart guy... look it up yourself. I even
gave you the google string.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
Max, instead of trying unsuccessfully to insult me, try typing in
"evidence for global warming" and see what you get. Here's one of 18
million links. Good night and good luck...

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...NGE1BECPI1.DTL

What evidence are you referring to? I see only a report based on talks
given at a meeting of the AAAS. I'd love to see the actual papers upon
which those talks were based, not just some reporter's interpretation of
what he heard. You still haven't provided any references or evidence.

Max