![]() |
Beneteau - a sailor/reviewer's thoughts
"Maxprop" wrote in message link.net... "John Cairns" wrote in message om... Spent a week on this Moody 38 CC. Thought it was a pig to weather, would have to try one without the inmast furling to properly evaluate it. That being said, the aft cabin was pretty nice, a real aft cabin AND it had a pilot berth between the aft cabin and main salon. Sorry to hear about its windward capability. That boat is high on our list of replacements for our current vessel. They certainly look beautiful, and well-made. Guess I'd better sail one before spending much time wanting one. Max I would try to get a model without the in mast for a test sail then, with the layout it really is a nice cruiser. It is fairly wet upwind also, needs a dodger. John Cairns |
Beneteau - a sailor/reviewer's thoughts
On 14 Feb 2006 14:21:05 -0800, "Capt. Rob" wrote:
What boat do you sail, Frank? Do you even OWN a boat???? Puhlease! RB 35s5 NY Well, since the answers to those questions, my sailing history and past and current ownership, have been answered often and fairly recently what could it be: Boobsprit is an arrogant SOB who only reads those that post to his trolls? Boobsprit is suffering from ADD or possibly dumb as a post and can't focus or remember anything? Boobsprit has just tossed out another bait to see if I will get defensive and defend my sailing resume? Think I'll go with all of the above. |
Beneteau - a sailor/reviewer's thoughts
"John Cairns" wrote in message . com... "Maxprop" wrote in message link.net... "John Cairns" wrote in message om... Spent a week on this Moody 38 CC. Thought it was a pig to weather, would have to try one without the inmast furling to properly evaluate it. That being said, the aft cabin was pretty nice, a real aft cabin AND it had a pilot berth between the aft cabin and main salon. Sorry to hear about its windward capability. That boat is high on our list of replacements for our current vessel. They certainly look beautiful, and well-made. Guess I'd better sail one before spending much time wanting one. Max I would try to get a model without the in mast for a test sail then, with the layout it really is a nice cruiser. It is fairly wet upwind also, needs a dodger. A cordial youngish couple pulled into our marina on one in August of '04. Flag blue hull and everything shining like new. It had a rather tall dodger, and they claimed it kept them dry and comfortable. I don't recall if theirs had in-mast RF, but I'd never opt for that. But that boat got me wishing I could find a nice, recent example. We'll definitely do a sail trial before signing anything. I may not have to worry, however--there are very few of them stateside. Max |
Beneteau - a sailor/reviewer's thoughts
"Capt. Rob" wrote in message oups.com... You didn't attribute it to anyone else, ring-a-round. You did endorse it by posting it, though. Yup...and he also thought the Pearson 30 was 30 feet long. Sloco also things the Catalina 350 is HUGE!!!! For 35' LOA, it is fairly voluminous below, and the cockpit is big enough for some limited entertaining. Is your 35s5 as large below? Max |
Beneteau - a sailor/reviewer's thoughts
"DSK" wrote in message ... Maxprop wrote: My biggest complaint with CC boats is that they can be very wet unless one has a very protective dodger with side curtains. Sitting that far forward over the hull insures getting spray in the face when working to weather in larger waves.. Once they get up to LOA over about 45 feet, that's not a problem. If you're thinking of a boat like the Moody 38CC, consider an Oyster instead. I love Oysters, but I'm not aware that they have anything in the 38' range, at least nothing recent. Further, they generally cost more than Moodys. Guess I should qualify my statement: we've been looking at boats in the 40-45' range, and after spending some time on several examples in that size range (Moorings 445, Saga 43, Catalina 42, Hunter 410, others) we've decided that 38' doesn't give up much in interior volume, nor in average hull speed over a typical 150-200 mile day. It does make maneuvering in close quarters, and finding slips, easier. And they generally cost less than boats of comparable quality over 40'. The Moody is one of the few higher-quality boats in that size. Max |
Beneteau - a sailor/reviewer's thoughts
"Frank Boettcher" wrote in message ... Something about the short CC boats that look fat, top heavy and awkward. That's always been my take as well. One of the better-looking shorter CC boats was S2's 35' Graham & Schlageter designed hull with a cruising CC deck arrangement. And they were ultra fast downwind. Beyond that, I've never though boats below about 44' looked good with CCs. Max |
Beneteau - a sailor/reviewer's thoughts
"Capt. Rob" wrote in message oups.com... Something about the short CC boats that look fat, top heavy and awkward. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but I always liked the look of the Endeavour 42 CC. This guy is a frikin idiot. Let me get this straight--this guy's an idiot because he expressed an opinion, and it differs from your own????? Max |
Beneteau - a sailor/reviewer's thoughts
"Capt. Rob" wrote in message oups.com... Yet he seems to have no qualms about belittling my opinions What opinions? That CC boats under 45 feet look fat? Sure sounds like an opinion to moi. Do masts also look tall to you? What about razors...sharp? How do these analogies relate to his opinion about boats appearing fat? I doubt if it's universally accepted that CC boats under 45' look "fat." To the contrary, shorter CC boats have sold well over the years. S2 built a bunch of 'em, so did Beneteau, Irwin, Morgan, and others. And obviously some people thought they were attractive. You have nothing new or enlightening to offer here and everyone knows it. What boat do you sail, Frank? Do you even OWN a boat???? Some have been posing the same questions to you, IIRC. Max |
Beneteau - a sailor/reviewer's thoughts
See what I was talking about?
-- "Swab Rob" the girly sailor.... Doug, you're such a putz. We looked at the Moody 36 CC and the sleeping quarters were horrible. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com