Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote
Age is finally getting to you? For sure - and it sucks. Tolerating? What are you going to do about it, whine the dude to death? Stand up and say it isn't right. Not back down from my belief that it isn't right. Ok, you'd whine them to death. Phobia: An irrational fear or anxiety .... like a phobia about certain sounds or words. So, where do you see fear or anxiety in any of my response. I see a pavlovian response involving irrational anxiety in all of them. No, there is nothing wrong with a *little* sensitivity but pavlovian oversensitivity, not callousness, is the demon. Nor is there anything wrong So far, I haven't seen your ability to do this. That's because you are phobic. Oh, well, if you day so! NOT Look at you knee jerk response to what you are conditioned to think are 'bad words'. It's the same response as someone with a snake phobia who steps on a snake. There's a difference between giving language color and being offensive for no reason. The latter is what we're talking about. No, expressions like this cause harm, sometimes physical harm to people if the people who use them are not called on their behavior. I didn't say that words could not hurt some people, just that words cannot hurt *rational* people. Someone who hates jews, for example, but is in denial, might be offended by 'Jew down' or 'Jew book' but the pain comes from his own prejudices not the words which bother nobody who lacks these prejudices. There is no word you could speak that would cause me anxiety, let alone irrational anxiety. Sure, whatever. I'm glad you finally agree and hope you will work on your phobias. |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Too bad for you. In any case, you're not much of a human being if you
condone this sort of behavior. It's got nothing to do with whether or not it hurts "rational" people. The issue is the cumlative effect of allowing this behavior to go unchallenged. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Vito" wrote in message ... "Jonathan Ganz" wrote Age is finally getting to you? For sure - and it sucks. Tolerating? What are you going to do about it, whine the dude to death? Stand up and say it isn't right. Not back down from my belief that it isn't right. Ok, you'd whine them to death. Phobia: An irrational fear or anxiety .... like a phobia about certain sounds or words. So, where do you see fear or anxiety in any of my response. I see a pavlovian response involving irrational anxiety in all of them. No, there is nothing wrong with a *little* sensitivity but pavlovian oversensitivity, not callousness, is the demon. Nor is there anything wrong So far, I haven't seen your ability to do this. That's because you are phobic. Oh, well, if you day so! NOT Look at you knee jerk response to what you are conditioned to think are 'bad words'. It's the same response as someone with a snake phobia who steps on a snake. There's a difference between giving language color and being offensive for no reason. The latter is what we're talking about. No, expressions like this cause harm, sometimes physical harm to people if the people who use them are not called on their behavior. I didn't say that words could not hurt some people, just that words cannot hurt *rational* people. Someone who hates jews, for example, but is in denial, might be offended by 'Jew down' or 'Jew book' but the pain comes from his own prejudices not the words which bother nobody who lacks these prejudices. There is no word you could speak that would cause me anxiety, let alone irrational anxiety. Sure, whatever. I'm glad you finally agree and hope you will work on your phobias. |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Capt. JG" wrote in message
... Too bad for you. In any case, you're not much of a human being if you condone this sort of behavior. It's got nothing to do with whether or not it hurts "rational" people. The issue is the cumlative effect of allowing this behavior to go unchallenged. Same response I'd expect from anybody with a phobia about (fill in blank) when they are told that their phobia is irrational. "It has nothing to do with whether or not garter snakes are poisonous. The issue is the cumulative effect of allowing one in your back yard where it might frighten me" |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Vito" wrote in message
... "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... Too bad for you. In any case, you're not much of a human being if you condone this sort of behavior. It's got nothing to do with whether or not it hurts "rational" people. The issue is the cumlative effect of allowing this behavior to go unchallenged. Same response I'd expect from anybody with a phobia about (fill in blank) when they are told that their phobia is irrational. Same response I'd expect from someone who is trying to defend the indefensible. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Republicans Distancing Themselves From Bush | General | |||
Bush to swim in Lava? | ASA | |||
So where is...................... | General | |||
A beer with Bush | General | |||
OT LIbby rats on Cheney! | General |