Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A lot of European manufactures used to use a 150% genny for calculating
SA for their brochures and spec sheets because they were undercanvased for the US market. Really, Sloco? Do you think that's the case with the 35s5? What about for the polars? How would it benefit a builder to use a 150% for polars vs. a 100% for optimum pointing? Anyone think Sloco can answer ANY of these? RB 35s5 NY |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Really, Sloco? Do you think that's the case with the 35s5? What
about for the polars? How would it benefit a builder to use a 150% for polars vs. a 100% for optimum pointing? Anyone think Sloco can answer ANY of these? Well, maybe you could educate me here. Most boats that I've been on point equally with a #1 or a #3. The sail that usually falls short in pointing ability is a #2. A sail that falls in the 135% range. I'll let you make a fool out of yourself now. |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, maybe you could educate me here. Most boats that I've been on
point equally with a #1 or a #3. The sail that usually falls short in pointing ability is a #2. Notice How Sloco couldn't answer the question, folks? I asked him how a builder would benefit from using a 150% in polars...with no mention of conditions BTW! Sloco knows boats! RB 35s5 NY |