Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rob,
A Gaff rigged anything is an interesting thing. I think that is why my father was so pleased to have one always. I agree they make a pretty sailplan. As opposed to the "Bermuda" or "Marconi" that evolved in the late 19th century, you could get more sail area for the same mast. Close hauled and beating, you pay for it. The weight aloft is some part of the issue, but the whole top of the sail is in the wind shadow of the gaff and the two halyard's tackle. A Proposal - with modern materials: I bet one could - make a gaff that had an aerodynamic section, and hoist it and the throat with winches and single runs of "spider" line - boof goes that issue. Now, with the software top design sails that runs on a PC, you could cut a sail that really worked. There is one problem that I see right away, - teh peak halyard is going to be really tough on the truck - when you want to tighten the leach to minimize the twist you are going to have a really tight headstay (assuming it is a masthead rig). I also see something I like a lot. When you need to de-power fast, you can drop the peak and let a bunch of sail fall behind the working portion - it will just go hide there and not flog (and you can get your father's catboat back to the morning and only get soaked to the skin). Somebody want to pay me to build them one? Matt Colie Lifelong Waterman, Licensed Mariner and Perpetual Sailor Capt. Rob wrote: I was looking through some old sailing books last night and started reading about the Gaff rigged schooners and sloops. Looking at the drawings I thought.... Doesn't the gaff allow for more roach with better control aloft? Is the penalty just the spar, which could be made ultralight these days? Wouldn't still add more sail area and superior shape on a modern ketch? Well, it's a pretty rig in any case. RB 35s5 NY |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Colie wrote:
Rob, A Gaff rigged anything is an interesting thing. I think that is why my father was so pleased to have one always. I agree they make a pretty sailplan. As opposed to the "Bermuda" or "Marconi" that evolved in the late 19th century, you could get more sail area for the same mast. Close hauled and beating, you pay for it. The weight aloft is some part of the issue, but the whole top of the sail is in the wind shadow of the gaff and the two halyard's tackle. A Proposal - with modern materials: I bet one could - make a gaff that had an aerodynamic section, and hoist it and the throat with winches and single runs of "spider" line - boof goes that issue. Now, with the software top design sails that runs on a PC, you could cut a sail that really worked. In fact the Bermuda evolved by the gaff becoming more and more verticle and aero dynamic. There is one problem that I see right away, - teh peak halyard is going to be really tough on the truck - when you want to tighten the leach to minimize the twist you are going to have a really tight headstay (assuming it is a masthead rig). I also see something I like a lot. When you need to de-power fast, you can drop the peak and let a bunch of sail fall behind the working portion - it will just go hide there and not flog (and you can get your father's catboat back to the morning and only get soaked to the skin). This called scandalizing the sail. When gybing, it is common to scandalize the main to prevent the sail from tear by having the gaff come screaming across ahead of the boom being eased out. Somebody want to pay me to build them one? Matt Colie Lifelong Waterman, Licensed Mariner and Perpetual Sailor Capt. Rob wrote: I was looking through some old sailing books last night and started reading about the Gaff rigged schooners and sloops. Looking at the drawings I thought.... Doesn't the gaff allow for more roach with better control aloft? Is the penalty just the spar, which could be made ultralight these days? Wouldn't still add more sail area and superior shape on a modern ketch? Well, it's a pretty rig in any case. RB 35s5 NY |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 18:15:51 -0500, Matt Colie wrote:
As opposed to the "Bermuda" or "Marconi" that evolved in the late 19th century, you could get more sail area for the same mast. Close hauled and beating, you pay for it. The weight aloft is some part of the issue, but the whole top of the sail is in the wind shadow of the gaff and the two halyard's tackle. A Proposal - with modern materials: I bet one could - make a gaff that had an aerodynamic section, and hoist it and the throat with winches and single runs of "spider" line - boof goes that issue. Now, with the software top design sails that runs on a PC, you could cut a sail that really worked. You make a point. Modern technology has been focused on the Bermuda, and the other sailplans keep falling farther behind. One has to wonder, if that same development had been given to other plans, junk, lateen, sprit, where they would stand today. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Except for Jeff....who thinks full length battens are the same as a
gaff rig (!!! See his post!!!) this was a good sailing thread. Thom, you are a living museum of sailing memories...I mean that in a good way. I had also looking at the new version of the Alerion 38, which ads big roach to the main...thought of adding sail area for the main on a ketch...and the gaff pics made me wonder. Too complicated, even if it could be engineered in a light weight version, especially since you'd need shape control for the topsail. RB 35s5 NY |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Capt. Rob wrote:
Except for Jeff....who thinks full length battens are the same as a gaff rig (!!! See his post!!!) Ah, Bob - you're the one referring to the peak of a gaff as "roach." Full length battens are the true way to get roach - the gaff usually adds too much twist. this was a good sailing thread. Thom, you are a living museum of sailing memories...I mean that in a good way. I had also looking at the new version of the Alerion 38, which ads big roach to the main...thought of adding sail area for the main on a ketch...and the gaff pics made me wonder. Too complicated, even if it could be engineered in a light weight version, especially since you'd need shape control for the topsail. You should check this out (third review, between the F33 and Mac 26!): http://www.sailnet.com/sailing/03/bobnov03.htm |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ah, Bob - you're the one referring to the peak of a gaff as "roach."
Full length battens are the true way to get roach - the gaff usually adds too much twist. Jeff, you lack imagination just as you lack brains. The whole point of the thread was to discuss a modern approach to the gaff. Everyone got that...but you. You're so busy trying to make up for all the beating you took, you're willing to throw your monkey poop in the air...even if most of it lands back on you! RB 35s5 NY |