Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Joe" wrote
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States That's a tough one - having to obey orders from the Constitution's worst enemy. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It seems to me that a soldier who served one tour of duty in
Afghanistan may be a deserter, but he's not a coward or a traitor. Joe wrote: That because you give no creedence to a oath. Not true at all. You were in the military...or so you say If I were going to lie, I'd make it more impressive. Guess you forgot everything you swore. Nope. Wrong again. I'm just not as quick to condemn as you are. Maybe I don't have some kind of psychological need to hate others. DSK |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Quick to condemn?
He admits he is a deserter. I did not condemn him he did it to himself, what about that do you not understand. It's not like we are missing evidence, or proof. Do you support liars? And BTW he is a traitor. Definitions of traitor on the Web: someone who betrays his country by committing treason double-crosser: a person who says one thing and does another www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn Definitions of treason on the Web: a crime that undermines the offender's government disloyalty by virtue of subversive behavior treachery: an act of deliberate betrayal www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn Do you need me to define betrayal? Joe |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe wrote:
Quick to condemn? Yes, as in calling people ugly names. I bet you probably would not to his face. He admits he is a deserter. That does not make him a traitor nor a coward. It's possible that he is one, or both, but why rush to condemn him based on your political prejudices? If you are so enthusiastic about war in Iraq, why not go yourself? Are you a coward? DSK |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Be Careful Joe;
Jon and Doug are both in the process of sloping and slanting YOUR post about the TRAITOR and making you the DEFENDENT! OT |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do you know what he did in Afghanistan? A cook in a kitchen thats what.
Big bad paratrooper..wonder why they stuck him with galley duty? And BTW since this is a time of war he can be put to death for deserting. IMO that may be a bit harsh, but 20 yrs in levenworth seem to fit the crime. And it's seems Canada judicial systems thinks it's 'not excessive or disproportionately severe.' Well done Canada. Guess they found out traitors aren't really worth having as citizens. Joe Joe |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug,
Do you consider D. Arnold a traitor? He severed with distinction before going against his Army Oath. Ole Thom http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsPage |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thom Stewart wrote:
Doug, Do you consider D. Arnold a traitor? He severed with distinction before going against his Army Oath. Do you mean Benedict Arnold? Heck yes he is a traitor. Among other things, he was commissioned as a general officer by the British after attempting to hand over West Point (an important strategic fort at the time). You're right, before that he served with great distinction... some would say he was the best American general of the Revolutionary War. There is a big difference between treason and desertion. Benedict Arnold did not merely desert his post. He actively warred against the United Stated. Yet another point: Military personnel fleeing to Canada from Stateside posts aren't even deserters. They're AWOL. To be a deserter, you have to flee your post in a war zone. DSK |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() DSK wrote: Yet another point: Military personnel fleeing to Canada from Stateside posts aren't even deserters. They're AWOL. To be a deserter, you have to flee your post in a war zone. DSK Desertion is defining as leaving with "intent to remain away permenantly" (Article 85 UCMJ.) Since the intent is often difficult to prove, most cases are simply charged as Unauthorized Absence (Article 86 UCMJ). Virtually all Article 86 cases serious enough for court martial will go to a Special Court Martial where the maximum penalty is Confinement for 6 months, reduction to pay grade E-1, forfeiture of pay, and a Bad Conduct Discharge. If Charged with Desertion, the case is usually heard at a General Court Martial, where the Maximum punishment for Article 85 (IIRC) is 5 years confinement and a Dishonorable Discharge. Joe |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe wrote:
Desertion is defining as leaving with "intent to remain away permenantly" True, it's also defined as leaving in order to avoid hazardous duty. So, you're right... those who flee to Canada are guilty of desertion. That does *not* make them guilty of treason. (Article 85 UCMJ.) Since the intent is often difficult to prove, most cases are simply charged as Unauthorized Absence (Article 86 UCMJ). Virtually all Article 86 cases serious enough for court martial will go to a Special Court Martial where the maximum penalty is Confinement for 6 months, reduction to pay grade E-1, forfeiture of pay, and a Bad Conduct Discharge. If Charged with Desertion, the case is usually heard at a General Court Martial, where the Maximum punishment for Article 85 (IIRC) is 5 years confinement and a Dishonorable Discharge. ** *** ** quote ** *** ** UCMJ article 85 (c) Any person found guilty of desertion or attempt to desert shall be punished, if the offense is committed in time of war, by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct, but if the desertion or attempt to desert occurs at any other time, by such punishment, other than death, as a court-martial may direct. ** *** ** quote ** *** ** It is proclaimed daily that we're at war. You've made that claim yourself, including stating that IYHO torture is justified because of the despicable nature of the enemy... as though the U.S. habitually (or even occasionally) made war on perfectly reasonable & morally elevated enemies... so do you think that deserters should be tortured, too? It would certainly discourage further desertion! You also have avoided answering the question, when are you going to combat duty in Iraq? Or if you feel you're too old, how about sending one or more of your kids? Doug King |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oh Canada! | ASA |