Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No I really wasn't, but I don't know Capt Neal so I'm not sure if he
does what he says he will do or not. I haven't lurked here long enough I guess. I have seen boats as small as 22 footers cross but I wouldn't want to do it. JR JG wrote: JR, you're joking right? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have seen boats as small as 22 footers cross but I wouldn't
want to do it How come? Joe |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It just doesn't appeal to me. I like more comfort than a 22 foot boat
can provide. JR Joe wrote: I have seen boats as small as 22 footers cross but I wouldn't want to do it How come? Joe |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
oh
|
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe" wrote in message I have seen boats as small as 22 footers cross but I wouldn't want to do it How come? Wish I could recall the name of their book, but a man and his wife sailed their 20' Pacific Seacraft Flicka from the US left coast to the South Pacific. The overriding theme of the book was the constant, incessant beatings they both took from their passages in such a tiny boat. They quit counting bruises and contusions after a while, there were far too many of each. A few serious injuries as well. His wife flew home, forcing him to single-hand on the homeward legs. Then only HE got beat up. Small boats, while capable of making open water passages, simply don't offer the level of comfort most humans have come to expect while sailing. Length generally equals comfort. Max |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maxprop wrote:
Wish I could recall the name of their book, but a man and his wife sailed their 20' Pacific Seacraft Flicka from the US left coast to the South Pacific. The overriding theme of the book was the constant, incessant beatings they both took from their passages in such a tiny boat. They quit counting bruises and contusions after a while, there were far too many of each. A few serious injuries as well. His wife flew home, forcing him to single-hand on the homeward legs. Then only HE got beat up. There's a similar book by a couple from Germany (live near Wilmington NC as of last report) who circumnavigated in a sistership of Sopranino... a 19 foot offshore racer. Interesting story, including quite a lot of rough sailing. The worst injury they had to contend with IIRC was a severe scalding from the galley... a very serious hazard in any boat (or any kitchen FWIW). Small boats, while capable of making open water passages, simply don't offer the level of comfort most humans have come to expect while sailing. Length generally equals comfort. JG wrote: I agree with you about small boats and level of comfort. I'd say that either displacement or cubic capacity equals comfort. ... Mine is fine for day sails, but I've never quite gotten used to the cofin-size sleeping arrangement. It's that traditional low sweeping profile. If you don't mind higher freeboard, you get decent head (and elbow) room. The Hunter 19 was quite comfortable for weekending, or any length of cruise where you could tie up or anchor in good shelter at night. Wouldn't be much fun trying to sleep offshore in it though. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote in message I'd say that either displacement or cubic capacity equals comfort. As a rule, yes, but a hull of a given volume can reach a point beyond which increasing displacement has a negative effect on comfort, not to mention safety. An example of this was a Norsea 27 in which a middle age man set out to circumnavigate some years ago. The boat has an unladen disp/length ratio of nearly 450, and with stores, extra fuel, water, equipment, etc. the boat was simply too heavy and performed horribly in beam seas, which rolled her over several times before he turned tail and headed home. Displacement seems to offset cubic capacity somewhat, making really voluminous but light boats uncomfortable and making voluminous and heavy boats more comfortable. Max |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd say that either displacement or cubic capacity equals comfort.
Maxprop wrote: As a rule, yes, but a hull of a given volume can reach a point beyond which increasing displacement has a negative effect on comfort, not to mention safety. Agreed. ... An example of this was a Norsea 27 in which a middle age man set out to circumnavigate some years ago. The boat has an unladen disp/length ratio of nearly 450, and with stores, extra fuel, water, equipment, etc. the boat was simply too heavy and performed horribly in beam seas, which rolled her over several times before he turned tail and headed home. THe problem is that he was at the margin... if you graphed motion & stability against increasing displacement on a given hull volume, you'd go from extremely bouncy (too bouyant) at the light extreme, to increasingly comfortable, then back downhill again as the boat lost responsiveness & stability (which is at least half due to bouyancy, let's not forget), then back up again as the boat becomes a submarine... the smoothest ride is 40+ fathoms down! ... Displacement seems to offset cubic capacity somewhat, making really voluminous but light boats uncomfortable and making voluminous and heavy boats more comfortable. Yep. Everything is a trade-off. That's why life is such a good metaphor for sailing.... Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote in message I'd say that either displacement or cubic capacity equals comfort. Maxprop wrote: As a rule, yes, but a hull of a given volume can reach a point beyond which increasing displacement has a negative effect on comfort, not to mention safety. Agreed. ... An example of this was a Norsea 27 in which a middle age man set out to circumnavigate some years ago. The boat has an unladen disp/length ratio of nearly 450, and with stores, extra fuel, water, equipment, etc. the boat was simply too heavy and performed horribly in beam seas, which rolled her over several times before he turned tail and headed home. THe problem is that he was at the margin... if you graphed motion & stability against increasing displacement on a given hull volume, you'd go from extremely bouncy (too bouyant) at the light extreme, to increasingly comfortable, then back downhill again as the boat lost responsiveness & stability (which is at least half due to bouyancy, let's not forget), then back up again as the boat becomes a submarine... the smoothest ride is 40+ fathoms down! LOL. Beneteau has, but does not distribute, graphic studies of net displacement vs. stability for all of its boats built after the mid-90s. Not sure if the French gov't. requires them or what, but I think they are all just computer models depicting the safety margins of their boats. I've seen the ones that apply to boats in the size range that interests me, and frankly it's a bit scary. Bottom line: don't overload a 39' Beneteau. And I'd suspect the same admonition might apply to similar boats, such as Jeanneaus, DuFours, Catalinas, Hunters, etc.= the plastic fantastics. What was interesting is that there seemed to be an over-center point, beyond which the stability of the boat fell off precipitously. It was not a smooth curve, rather it peaked, then plunged. I'm surprised that boat builders don't publish a *do not exceed* load figure for each boat, even if they don't want those graphs out and about. ... Displacement seems to offset cubic capacity somewhat, making really voluminous but light boats uncomfortable and making voluminous and heavy boats more comfortable. Yep. Everything is a trade-off. That's why life is such a good metaphor for sailing.... Aw, heck, I want it all, dammit. g Max |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The same could be said for motorhomes on the highway. In the ones greater
than 40 feet in length the potholes, small children, old ladies and bus stop benches just seem to disappear under the wheels with no sound at all. Lloyd "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Joe" wrote in message I have seen boats as small as 22 footers cross but I wouldn't want to do it How come? Wish I could recall the name of their book, but a man and his wife sailed their 20' Pacific Seacraft Flicka from the US left coast to the South Pacific. The overriding theme of the book was the constant, incessant beatings they both took from their passages in such a tiny boat. They quit counting bruises and contusions after a while, there were far too many of each. A few serious injuries as well. His wife flew home, forcing him to single-hand on the homeward legs. Then only HE got beat up. Small boats, while capable of making open water passages, simply don't offer the level of comfort most humans have come to expect while sailing. Length generally equals comfort. Max |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|